ScalingStacks

0P5W

Proof. The lemma follows from the commutativity of the following diagram:

E22​(m)⊕E2​E1​(m)\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}(m)\oplus E_{2}E_{1}(m)}E1​E2​(m)⊕E12​(m)\textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}(m)\oplus E_{1}^{2}(m)}E22​(m~)⊕E2​E1​(m~)\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}(\tilde{m})\oplus E_{2}E_{1}(\tilde{m})}E1​E2​(m~)⊕E12​(m~)\textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}(\tilde{m})\oplus E_{1}^{2}(\tilde{m})}σ∘E2​π∘τ2\scriptstyle{\sigma\circ E_{2}\pi\circ\tau_{2}}τ1∘E1​π∘σ\scriptstyle{\tau_{1}\circ E_{1}\pi\circ\sigma}σ\scriptstyle{\sigma}E22​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}^{2}f}E2​E1​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}E_{1}f}E1​E2​f\scriptstyle{E_{1}E_{2}f}E12​f\scriptstyle{E_{1}^{2}f}σ∘E2​π~∘τ2\scriptstyle{\sigma\circ E_{2}\tilde{\pi}\circ\tau_{2}}τ1∘E1​π~∘σ\scriptstyle{\tau_{1}\circ E_{1}\tilde{\pi}\circ\sigma}σ\scriptstyle{\sigma}

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2