ScalingStacks

0P4X

Proof. Denote by ff the map of the lemma. By [Lus, §3.6] (cf also [BjBr, Proposition 8.3.3]), the restriction of ff to WnW_{n} induces an isomorphism with the subgroup of 𝔖^n\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n} of elements σ\sigma such that ∑i=1n(σ⁡(i)−i)=0\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\sigma(i)-i)=0. It is immediate to check that ff extends to a morphism of groups Wn⋊⟨c⟩→𝔖^nW_{n}\rtimes\langle c\rangle\to\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n}.

Consider σ∈𝔖^n\sigma\in\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n} and let N=∑i=1n(σ⁡(i)−i)N=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\sigma(i)-i). Note that n|Nn|N. Put σ′=σf(c)−N/n\sigma^{\prime}=\sigma f(c)^{-N/n}. We have σ′∈f⁡(Wn)\sigma^{\prime}\in f(W_{n}), so ff is surjective. Let σ=f⁡(w​cd)\sigma=f(wc^{d}). We have ∑i=1n(σ⁡(i)−i)=n​d\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\sigma(i)-i)=nd. So, if σ=1\sigma=1, then d=0d=0, hence w∈ker⁡(f)∩Wn=1w\in\ker(f)\cap W_{n}=1. This shows that ff is injective. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2