ScalingStacks

0P4S

Proof. The first statement follows from Proposition 3.1.3. The second statement is a property of the multiplication of TwT_{w}’s.

For the third statement, let us assume r<r′r<r^{\prime}. We have sir+1⋯sir′=sir⋯sir′−1s_{i_{r+1}}\cdots s_{i_{r^{\prime}}}=s_{i_{r}}\cdots s_{i_{r^{\prime}-1}} reduced, hence sirsir+1⋯sir′s_{i_{r}}s_{i_{r+1}}\cdots s_{i_{r^{\prime}}} is not reduced, a contradiction. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2