ScalingStacks

[0031]

Proposition 3.1.8.

Given \(\mathcal C, \mathcal D\in \mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\), together with \(A, B \in \mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal C)\).

  1. The relative tensor product \(-\otimes_A - \colon \mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C) \times \mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C) \rightarrow\mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C)\) defines a presentably symmetric monoidal structure on \(\mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C)\). Moreover, there is an equivalence \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C)) \simeq \mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal C)_{A/}\).

  2. Any algebra homomorphism \(f\colon A\rightarrow B\) in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal C)\) induces a symmetric monoidal induction functor \(-\otimes_A B\colon \mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C) \rightarrow\mathrm{Mod}_B(\mathcal C)\) that is left adjoint to the restriction functor along \(f\), and hence a morphism in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\).

  3. For any algebra homomorphism \(A\rightarrow B\), it follows from (2) that we can view \(B\) as an object in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C))\). Forgetting the \(A\)-action induces a symmetric monoidal equivalence: \[\mathrm{Mod}_B(\mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C)) \xrightarrow{\simeq} \mathrm{Mod}_B(\mathcal C)\]

  4. Any functor \(F \colon \mathcal C\rightarrow\mathcal D\) in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\) induces a functor \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal C) \rightarrow\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal D)\) on commutative algebra objects, which we will also simply denote by \(F\). Moreover, it induces a functor \[\mathrm{Mod}_A(F) \colon \mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C) \rightarrow\mathrm{Mod}_{F(A)}(\mathcal D)\] in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\).

  5. Any functor \(F \colon \mathcal C\rightarrow\mathcal D\) in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\) induces an equivalence in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\) \[\mathcal D\otimes_{\mathcal C}(\mathrm{Mod}_A(\mathcal C)) \simeq \mathrm{Mod}_{F(A)}(\mathcal D),\] where \(-\otimes_{\mathcal C}-\) denotes the pushout in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\), whose underlying presentable \(\infty\)-category is given by the relative tensor product in \(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L}\) [Lur17, Prop. 3.2.4.10], hence the notation.

[0037]

Proof.

The first two statements follow from [Lur17, Prop. 3.4.1.3, Cor. 4.2.3.7, Thm. 4.5.3.1], the third statement follows from [Lur17, Cor. 3.4.1.9]. The existence of the symmetric monoidal functor \(\mathrm{Mod}_A(F)\) in part ([0035]) follows from the functoriality of the \(\mathrm{Mod}\) construction in  [Lur17, § 3.3.3]. Furthermore, \(\mathrm{Mod}_A(F)\) preserves colimits by [Lur17, Cor. 4.2.3.5]. Functoriality of the construction of modules induces a commuting square in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\) Original paper diagram and hence a morphism in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\) from the pushout \(\mathcal D\otimes_{\mathcal C} \mathrm{Mod}_{A}(\mathcal C) \rightarrow\mathrm{Mod}_{F(A)}(\mathcal D)\). This is an equivalence in \(\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathrm{Pr}^\mathrm{L})\) because its underlying functor is one by [Lur17, Thm. 4.8.4.6]. ◻

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Yu Leon Liu, Aaron Mazel-Gee, David Reutter, Catharina Stroppel, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:2401.02956v2

Original source · 2401.02956v2