ScalingStacks

A.3 Higher coherence[00II]

Here we briefly illustrate the primary operational difference between working in ordinary categories and working in \(\infty\)-categories, namely that in the latter case one must keep track of higher coherence data.

Let \(M\) be a monoid (i.e. a set equipped with an associative and unital binary operation). Then, the data of \(M\) is entirely recorded by its bar construction, a simplicial set \({\textup{Bar}}(M)\) with \({\textup{Bar}}(M)_n \coloneqq M^{\times n}\) whose face and degeneracy maps respectively record the product and unit of \(M\). Indeed, \(M\) is already completely specified by the restriction \(\Delta^\mathrm{op}_{\leq 3} \hookrightarrow\Delta^\mathrm{op}\xrightarrow{{\textup{Bar}}(M)} \mathrm{Set}\); note that the associativity of its multiplication is guaranteed by the commutativity of a certain square Original paper diagram of face maps in \(\Delta^\mathrm{op}\) (whose morphisms all correspond to endpoint-preserving injections in \(\Delta\)). Altogether, we can identify monoids as a full subcategory either of \(\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^\mathrm{op},\mathrm{Set})\) or of \(\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^\mathrm{op}_{\leq 3},\mathrm{Set})\).

By contrast, such a restriction – or more generally, the restriction to \(\Delta^\mathrm{op}_{\leq n} \subset \Delta^\mathrm{op}\) for any \(n\) – is not possible in the context of \(\infty\)-category theory. As a fundamental example, an \(\infty\)-monoid \(M\) (i.e. an \(\infty\)-categorical monoid object in \(\mathcal S\)) is completely specified by its bar construction \(\Delta^\mathrm{op}\xrightarrow{{\textup{Bar}}(M)} \mathcal S\) (whose face and degeneracy maps likewise record its product and unit). Heuristically, we may think of relations among various morphisms and their composites in \(\Delta^\mathrm{op}\) as recording coherence data for the muliplication of \(M\), inasmuch as the functor \({\textup{Bar}}(M)\) carries these equalities in the hom-sets of \(\Delta^\mathrm{op}\) only to “homotopy-coherent equalities” (i.e. higher equivalences) in \(\mathcal S\).48 Because \(\mathcal S\) is an \(\infty\)-category (and not an \((n,1)\)-category for any \(n < \infty\), i.e. its hom-spaces can have homotopy groups in arbitrarily high dimensions), these coherence data never become unique or vacuous after some finite stage.

We note for future reference that \(\infty\)-monoids can be identified (via their bar constructions) as the full subcategory of \(\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^\mathrm{op}, \mathcal S)\) on those simplicial spaces \(X\) satisfying a Segal condition, namely that for every \(n \geq 0\) a certain natural morphism \(X_n \rightarrow(X_1)^{\times n}\) is an equivalence.

We generally suppress the modifier “homotopy coherently” (e.g. of the adjectives “associative” and “unital”), unless we specifically mean to draw attention to it.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Yu Leon Liu, Aaron Mazel-Gee, David Reutter, Catharina Stroppel, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:2401.02956v2

Original source · 2401.02956v2