There is a close connection between stable -categories and
spectral categories. On the one hand, for every pair of objects in a
stable -category we can extract a mapping spectrum, as we
discussed in definition 2.15. On the other
hand, given a category enriched in spectra, the category of
(right) -modules has a standard projective model structure and
the associated -category is stable.
The purpose of this section is to provide a precise account of the
relationship between small spectral categories and small stable
-categories. The moral of the story is that the homotopy theory
of small spectral categories, localized at the Morita equivalences, is
the same as the homotopy theory of small stable idempotent-complete
-categories. Specifically, we prove theorem 1.10 from
the introduction, which can be thought of as a generalization of the Morita theory of [69]; that is, small stable idempotent-complete -categories are -categories of
modules, and the -category of exact functors between two such is a
stable subcategory of the -category of bimodules.
Establishing this correspondence serves several purposes for us. For
one thing, having models of and as
accessible localizations of an -category which arises as the nerve
of a model category provides technical control on and
; we use this to show that and
are compactly generated in corollary 4.25. For another, it
permits us to rectify diagrams of small stable -categories to
strict diagrams in . We exploit this to pass to rigid models
for the purposes of using Waldhausen’s -theory machinery in
Section 7.
As described in Section 2.2, we have several
equivalent options for producing a model of the -category of
spectral categories (with respect to the DK-equivalences): we can use
the combinatorial simplicial model structure of
Corollary 2.4 and take , we can
use the Dwyer-Kan simplicial localization followed by fibrant
replacement to obtain , or we can invert the weak
equivalences and form . We will
refer interchangably to the underlying -category as “the”
-category of small spectral categories.
4.1. Stable envelopes of spectral categories
Given any spectral category , we can produce an -category by
passing to the associated simplicial category, fibrantly replacing, and applying the simplicial nerve to obtain .
This process yields a functor
from the category of small spectral categories to the
category of simplicial sets. Precomposing with the functors
and , we obtain functors
and a natural transformation . First,
we observe that these functors are compatible with the weak
equivalences of Theorem 2.2.
Lemma 4.1.Let and be small spectral categories, and let be a DK-equivalence. Then the induced maps
and are categorical equivalences of
simplicial sets.
Proof.If is a DK-equivalence, then one can check that
gives a Quillen equivalence between the spectral model
categories of -modules and the spectral model
category of -modules. Passing to underlying
simplicial categories of cofibrant and fibrant objects, we see that
and
are DK-equivalent
simplicial categories. Finally, applying the simplicial nerve yields
categorically equivalent simplicial sets. Restricting to various full
subcategories yields the result for and
.
∎
Therefore, we have induced functors and
connecting and
, equipped with a natural
transformation connecting them:
In fact, by construction these functors preserve triangulated and
Morita equivalences respectively. Furthermore, lands in
small stable -categories and lands in
idempotent-complete stable -categories.
Proof.As noted in remark 2.13, since is the
underlying simplicial category associated to a pretriangulated
spectral category, is characterized as the idempotent-completion of given by proposition 3.2 coupled with
corollary 3.3. Finally, note that maps of spectral categories induce, by left Kan extension, finite colimit-preserving on the level of stable -categories.
∎
Consequently, we may regard as a functor and as a functor .
Remark 4.3. Using the machinery of combinatorial simplicial model categories, we
can also localize the combinatorial model structure of
corollary 2.4 on at the triangulated or
Morita equivalences directly to obtain “triangulated” or “Morita”
simplicial model categories on small spectral categories and then pass
to simplicial nerves; this is equivalent to localizing the
-category .
The content of theorem 1.10 is that these functors are
equivalences. We prove this theorem by producing an “inverse” to
and such that the composite is a
localization functor on . We begin
with the following definition:
Definition 4.4. A simplicial category is stable if the simplicial nerve of
a fibrant replacement of is a stable -category. A spectral
category is stable if its underlying simplicial category
is stable.
We have the following characterization of equivalences between stable
spectral categories (see also [11, 5.7]).
Proof.Certainly essential surjectivity is determined on the level of the
homotopy category, so it suffices to show that, for all pairs of
objects and of , for
all integers whenever this is the case for .
Since and are stable,
so this is immediate.
∎
We write for the simplicial category of small
stable simplicial categories. We can model this as the subcategory of
the simplicial category of small simplicial categories
where the objects are the stable simplicial categories and the mapping
spaces are computed by restriction of vertices to those simplicial functors which represent exact functors upon passage to the simplicial nerve.
Proposition 4.6.The -category obtained by applying the simplicial nerve to (a
fibrant replacement of) is equivalent to the
-category . That is, the equivalence (induced by the
simplicial nerve [52, 2.2.0.1])
Proof.It suffices to show that the mapping spaces in
have the correct homotopy type, and this follows from the comparison
between the mapping spaces of and
[52, 2.2.0.1] and the fact that on both sides we define
the mapping spaces by the same restriction of vertices.
∎
4.2. Spectral enrichment of stable -categories
The mapping spaces of a stable -category are naturally the underlying spaces of mapping spectra, as discussed in section 2.3.
We now use this to construct a cofibrant and fibrant
spectral category whose underlying -category
is equivalent to . Indeed, the
simplicial category of presheaves of spectra
on the associated (cofibrant) simplicial category
is simultaneously a simplicial model category as well as a spectral
category, where the spectral enrichment is inherited from the
spectral structure on itself.
Moreover, we have an equivalence
so it makes sense to ask whether or not a given presheaf of spectra is
stably representable (in the underlying -category
).
which evidently factors through the full simplicial subcategory
spanned by the stably representable functors.
The map is the adjoint of the resulting
map .
To see that this map is an equivalence, we observe first that it is
essentially surjective: indeed, a stably representable cofibrant and
fibrant functor is necessarily of the form
for some spectrum object of
. Since is stable,
for some object of , so is in the
image of (which sends to the presheaf represented by
). This map is also fully faithful, because if
and are any pair of objects of , then
since .
∎
We have the following description of in terms of the stable
Yoneda embedding.
Proof.We first check that the construction of induces a
functor . Let be a map of
stable simplicial categories and write
for
the induced spectral functor. Suppose that is
projectively cofibrant and fibrant and that is
stably representable via the spectrum object in .
Since the diagram
commutes (where the vertical maps are the stable Yoneda
embeddings), we see that restricts to a spectral functor
.
To verify that induces a simplicial functor, we must check
that it preserves equivalences of stable simplicial categories. So
suppose that is an equivalence of stable simplicial
categories. Then it follows that is a
DK-equivalence of spectral categories, as is its restriction to the
stably representable objects.
∎
Proof.The first equivalence follows from the definition of as the smallest stable subcategory of the stable -category containing the representables, together with the observations that is compactly generated with compact objects
and (as -categories are automatically idempotent-complete).
The second equivalence follows immediately from proposition 3.2.
∎
4.3. The triangulated and Morita localizations
Let
denote the composite functor
(4.12)
As the previous proposition suggests, is essentially the same as the pretriangulated spectral closure of .
Proof.By Yoneda’s lemma, mapping spectra in between stably representable objects are given by mapping spectra between the representing spectrum objects, giving an equivalence
Since is a stable -category of spectral functors, Yoneda’s lemma also gives an equivalence
Proof.First note that sends
to
the functor induced by
homotopy left Kan extension along
.
If is represented by the object of , then the
universal properties of representable functors and homotopy left Kan
extensions force an equivalence , so that is
represented by . It follows that the restrictions of
and to are equivalent.
∎
Proof.Since generates under finite homotopy colimits and
desuspensions, it suffices to show that preserves finite
homotopy colimits and desuspensions. The fact that
preserves finite homotopy colimits follows from the fact that
is a homotopy left Kan extension along .
But suspension is an example of a finite homotopy colimit, so we have
that . Hence
, and as is
stable we see that . The final statement is a consequence of corollary
4.16 and the fact that is a stable spectral category.
∎
is a DK-equivalence of spectral categories.
Since and the are all stable spectral categories and
and commute with filtered colimits, this follows
from propositions 4.5 and 4.8.
∎
Following Definition 2.7, we make the following definitions.
admits a fully faithful and accessible right adjoint
That is, the -category of stable -categories is an accessible
localization of the -category of spectral categories obtained by
inverting the triangulated equivalences.
Proof.The follows from the factorization of given in
equation 4.12 and proposition 4.20.
∎
Recall that we have a stable idempotent completion functor
. Since is left
adjoint to the (fully faithful) inclusion
, is the
localization of obtain by inverting idempotent
completion maps. Further, recall that there is an equivalence .
admits a fully faithful and accessible right adjoint
That is, the -category of idempotent-complete stable
-categories is an accessible localization of the -category of
spectral categories obtained by inverting the Morita equivalences.
Proof.The -category of idempotent-complete stable -categories is a
localizing subcategory of the -category of stable -categories,
and idempotent-completion is an accessible functor as the
inclusion preserves filtered colimits.
∎
Remark 4.24. Theorems 4.22 and 4.23 imply that computing
the localizations of the model category structure on spectral
categories from Corollary 2.4 at the triangulated
and Morita equivalences (as discussed in Remark 4.3)
and passing to the simplicial nerve also yields the -categories
and respectively.
We conclude the section with the promised applications of the theory.
First, the fact that we have accessible localizations provides the
following corollary about the structure of and
.
Definition 4.26. Let and be small idempotent-complete stable
-categories. We write
for the small pretriangulated spectral category associated to the
small stable -category of exact functors from to .
Corollary 4.27.Let and be idempotent-complete small stable
-categories and let and
be spectral categories lifting and .
Then is equivalent to the
-category of right-compact
-modules.
Proposition 4.28.Let be a small category. Given a diagram of small stable
-categories indexed by , there exists an -diagram of
pretriangulated spectral categories lifting .
Proof.This is a consequence of [52, 4.2.4.4]. Given a diagram of
small stable -categories, the equivalence in
theorem 4.22 gives rise to a diagram in the localization
of . Including the localization
into , we now obtain a diagram in
and we can
use [52, 4.2.4.4] to lift this to a rigid diagram in .
∎