ScalingStacks

3. Symmetric monoidal structure and dualizable objects

In this section we study the theory of dualizable objects in Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}. To this end, we need to give a very brief review of the construction of the symmetric monoidal structure on Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}. We do not give a full review of the theory of monoidal ∞\infty-categories in this section, since we need only a small piece of the theory.

3.1. Tensor products of stable ∞\infty-categories

The ∞\infty-category 𝒫​rStL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}} of presentable stable ∞\infty-categories is a closed symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category with product ⊗\otimes and internal mapping object given by the presentable stable ∞\infty-category FunL​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) of colimit-preserving functors [53, 6.3.1.14, 6.3.1.17]. Following [8, §4.1.2], we can then define the tensor product on small idempotent-complete stable ∞\infty-categories as

𝒞​⊗^​𝒟=(Ind⁡(𝒞)⊗Ind⁡(𝒟))ω.{\mathcal{C}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{D}}=(\Ind({\mathcal{C}})\otimes\Ind({\mathcal{D}}))^{\omega}.

The tensor product of idempotent-complete small stable ∞\infty-categories is characterized by the universal property that maps out of 𝒜⊗ℬ{\mathcal{A}}\otimes{\mathcal{B}} correspond to maps out of the product 𝒜×ℬ{\mathcal{A}}\times{\mathcal{B}} which preserve finite colimits in each variable [8, 4.4]. If 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} and ℬ{\mathcal{B}} are arbitrary small stable ∞\infty-categories, then we set 𝒜​⊗^​ℬ:=Idem⁡(𝒜)​⊗^​Idem⁡(ℬ){\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}:=\Idem({\mathcal{A}})\widehat{\otimes}\Idem({\mathcal{B}}).

More precisely, we can define Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} as a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category as follows. Let 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}} denote the full subcategory of 𝒫​rStL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}} on the compactly-generated stable ∞\infty-categories. The criterion of [53, 2.2.1.2] implies that 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}} is a symmetric monoidal subcategory of 𝒫​rStL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}}; the tensor product of compactly-generated stable ∞\infty-categories is itself compactly-generated, as is the unit 𝒮∞≃Ind⁡(𝒮∞ω){\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}\simeq\Ind({\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega}).

For a small stable idempotent-complete ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} and a presentable ∞\infty-category ℬ{\mathcal{B}}, Funex\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex} and FunL\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}} are related by the formula

Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)≃FunL​(Ind⁡(𝒜),ℬ),\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\Ind({\mathcal{A}}),{\mathcal{B}}),

which follows from [52, 5.3.5.10] and the fact that functors which preserve filtered colimits and finite colimits preserve all colimits. Note that

Ind:Cat∞perf⟶𝒫​rStL\Ind\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}}

factors through the full subcategory 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}} by definition. This gives an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories between Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} and the subcategory 𝒫​rStLω{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}}_{\omega} of 𝒫​rStL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}} whose objects are the compactly-generated stable ∞\infty-categories and whose maps

Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)≃FunωL​(Ind⁡(𝒜),Ind⁡(ℬ))⊂FunL​(Ind⁡(𝒜),Ind⁡(ℬ)),\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\omega}(\Ind({\mathcal{A}}),\Ind({\mathcal{B}}))\subset\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\Ind({\mathcal{A}}),\Ind({\mathcal{B}})),

are the full subcategory of the colimit-preserving functors Ind⁡(𝒜)→Ind⁡(ℬ)\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind({\mathcal{B}}) which preserve compact objects [52, 5.5.7.10]. We regard Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} as a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category via this equivalence. The observation of [53, 6.3.1.17] implies that Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} is closed. Hence we have the following result.

0NJW

Theorem 3.1. The ∞\infty-category of small idempotent-complete stable ∞\infty-categories is a closed symmetric monoidal category with respect to ⊗^\widehat{\otimes}. The unit is the ∞\infty-category 𝒮∞ω{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega} of compact spectra and the internal mapping object is given for small idempotent-complete stable ∞\infty-categories 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} and ℬ{\mathcal{B}} by Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}).

Given a small stable idempotent-complete ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}, we have the ∞\infty-category of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}-modules, given by the compactly-generated stable ∞\infty-category Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}). The stable Yoneda embedding provides an exact functor [52, 5.3.5.2]

𝒜⟶Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞).{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).
0NJX

Proposition 3.2. For any small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}, the stable Yoneda embedding

𝒜⟶Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞){\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})

induces an equivalence Ind⁡(𝒜)≃Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).

0NJY

Proof. Clearly Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) admits filtered colimits, as the filtered colimit of finite colimit preserving functors itself preserves finite colimits. This gives a map Ind⁡(𝒜)→Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) which is evidently fully faithful since, using the fact that the usual Yoneda embedding is fully faithful and that mapping spaces between representables in Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) are computed as the limit

limnΩn​map⁡(a,Σn​b)≃limnmap⁡(a,Ωn​Σn​b)≃map⁡(a,b).\lim_{n}\Omega^{n}\map(a,\Sigma^{n}b)\simeq\lim_{n}\map(a,\Omega^{n}\Sigma^{n}b)\simeq\map(a,b).

To show that this map is also essentially surjective, we must show that any exact functor f:𝒜op→𝒮∞f\colon{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} is ind-representable. Consider the pullback

𝒜/f\textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}_{/f}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)/f\textstyle{\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})_{/f}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞),\textstyle{\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}),}

where the right vertical map is the stable Yoneda embedding. We claim that the ∞\infty-category 𝒜/f{\mathcal{A}}_{/f} is filtered: to see this, let KK be a finite simplicial set and K→𝒜/fK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}_{/f} a functor. Since both 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} and Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)/f\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})_{/f} admit finite colimits and both functors to Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) preserve finite colimits, we may extend K→𝒜/fK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}_{/f} to a colimit diagram K⊳→𝒜/fK^{\triangleright}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}_{/f}. In particular, this gives a cone on K→𝒜/fK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}_{/f}, which shows that 𝒜/f{\mathcal{A}}_{/f} is a filtered ∞\infty-category. Finally, since filtered colimits in Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) are computed pointwise, it follows that ff is a colimit of the diagram 𝒜/f⟶Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞){\mathcal{A}}_{/f}\longrightarrow\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}), which is to say that it is ind-representable. ∎

Provided 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is idempotent-complete,  [52, 5.4.2.4] tells us that the essential image of the Yoneda embedding is precisely the ∞\infty-category of compact 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}-modules

𝒜≃Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)ω.{\mathcal{A}}\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})^{\omega}.

Moreover, we know that if 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is an arbitrary small stable ∞\infty-category, then the Yoneda map 𝒜→Funex​(𝒜op,𝒮∞)ω{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})^{\omega} models the idempotent-completion of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}.

We use the preceding results to characterize Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) in terms of a certain subcategory of FunL​(𝒜​⊗^​ℬop,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}), the ∞\infty-category of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}-ℬ{\mathcal{B}}-bimodules. Specifically, the Yoneda embedding ℬ→Funex​(ℬop,𝒮∞){\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) provides the following composite

Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\displaystyle\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) ⟶Funex​(𝒜,Funex​(ℬop,𝒮∞))\displaystyle\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}))
⟶FunL​(Ind⁡(𝒜),FunL​(Ind⁡(ℬop),𝒮∞))\displaystyle\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\Ind({\mathcal{A}}),\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\Ind({\mathcal{B}}^{\op}),{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}))
⟶FunL​(Ind⁡(𝒜)⊗Ind⁡(ℬop),𝒮∞)\displaystyle\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\otimes\Ind({\mathcal{B}}^{\op}),{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})
⟶Funex​(𝒜​⊗^​ℬop,𝒮∞),\displaystyle\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}),

which exhibits Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) as a full subcategory of 𝒜op​⊗^​ℬ{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}-modules.

We have the following useful corollary, which is the analogue of a characterization originally written down by Toën [80]. For each object a∈𝒜a\in{\mathcal{A}}, we have a map of small idempotent-complete stable ∞\infty-categories 𝒮∞ω→𝒜{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}} given by sending 𝕊∈𝒮∞ω\mathbb{S}\in{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega} to a∈𝒜a\in{\mathcal{A}}. Since 𝒮∞ω{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega} is the unit of the tensor ⊗^\widehat{\otimes}, we obtain a restriction map

νa:Funex​(𝒜​⊗^​ℬop,𝒮∞)⟶Funex​(ℬop,𝒮∞).\nu_{a}\colon\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).

If the image of an element of Funex​(𝒜​⊗^​ℬop,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) under νa\nu_{a} is compact for every a∈𝒜a\in{\mathcal{A}}, we will say that the element is right-compact.

0NJZ

Corollary 3.3. Let 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} and ℬ{\mathcal{B}} be small stable idempotent-complete ∞\infty-categories. There is an equivalence of small stable idempotent-complete ∞\infty-categories between Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) and ∞\infty-category of right-compact 𝒜op​⊗^​ℬ{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}-modules.

0NK0

Proof. Since the Yoneda embedding is fully faithful, it suffices to look at the essential image of the composite. The image of Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) in Funex​(𝒜​⊗^​ℬop,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) under νa\nu_{a} is identified with the image of Funex​(𝒜,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) in Funex​(𝒜,Funex​(ℬop,𝒮∞))\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})) under the corresponding map 𝒮∞ω→𝒜{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}. Since this lies inside the image of BB inside Funex​(ℬop,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) under the Yoneda embedding, the result follows. ∎

3.2. Smooth and proper stable ∞\infty-categories

Our final goal in this section is to characterize the dualizable objects of Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}. To do so, we need to introduce certain smallness conditions on small stable ∞\infty-categories.

0NK1

Definition 3.4. A small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is proper if, for all pairs of objects aa and bb of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}, the mapping spectrum 𝒜⁡(a,b){\mathcal{A}}(a,b) (recall definition 2.15) is compact.

Note that a small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is proper if and only if its idempotent-completion Idem⁡(𝒜)\Idem({\mathcal{A}}) is proper, as retracts of compact objects are compact.

0NK2

Definition 3.5. A small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is smooth if it is perfect as an 𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}-module (i.e., in the smallest subcategory of Funex​(𝒜​⊗^​𝒜op,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) generated by the representables under finite colimits and retracts). If 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is idempotent-complete, we may equivalently require that 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is a representable 𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}-module: since 𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}} is an idempotent-complete stable ∞\infty-category, it is closed under finite colimits and retracts, and so any perfect 𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}-module is representable.

We will typically only be interested in smoothness and properness of small stable ∞\infty-categories which are also idempotent-complete. This is because these are the situations which arise in algebra and geometry, e.g. when 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is the stable ∞\infty-category of perfect modules for a ring spectrum or perfect complexes for a scheme, and such categories are always idempotent complete. Conversely (as we will show in section 4) any idempotent-complete small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is equivalent to the stable ∞\infty-category of perfect modules for some spectral category.

3.3. Dualizability

We now recall the definitions of dualizability in symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-categories from [53, §4.2.5]. The salient fact here is that dualizability can be detected in the (symmetric monoidal) homotopy category:

0NK3

Definition 3.6. Let 𝒞⊗{\mathcal{C}}^{\otimes} be a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category. An object of the underlying ∞\infty-category 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} of 𝒞⊗{\mathcal{C}}^{\otimes} is said to be dualizable if it is dualizable as an object of the symmetric monoidal homotopy category of 𝒞⊗{\mathcal{C}}^{\otimes}.

In other words, an object AA of 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} is dualizable if there exists an object D​ADA together with an evaluation map ϵ:A⊗D​A→1\epsilon:A\otimes DA\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}1 and a coevaluation map δ:1→D​A⊗A\delta:1\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}DA\otimes A such that the composites

A≃A⊗1​⟶A⊗δ​A⊗D​A⊗A​⟶ϵ⊗A​1⊗A≃AA\simeq A\otimes 1\overset{A\otimes\delta}{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}A\otimes DA\otimes A\overset{\epsilon\otimes A}{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}1\otimes A\simeq A

and

D​A≃1⊗D​A​⟶δ⊗D​A​D​A⊗A⊗D​A​⟶D​A⊗ϵ​D​A⊗1≃D​ADA\simeq 1\otimes DA\overset{\delta\otimes DA}{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}DA\otimes A\otimes DA\overset{DA\otimes\epsilon}{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}DA\otimes 1\simeq DA

are the respective identities in Ho⁡(𝒞)\Ho({\mathcal{C}}). The object D​ADA is called the dual of AA, and is unique up to equivalence in 𝒞{\mathcal{C}}.

Recall that the discussion preceding theorem 3.1 above identifies Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} as a symmetric monoidal subcategory of 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}}; in particular, the functor Ind\Ind preserves dualizable objects. Next, observe that 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}} is a rigid symmetric monoidal category; that is, all objects in 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}} are dualizable. This is because, for 𝒜∈Cat∞perf{\mathcal{A}}\in\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},

Ind⁡(𝒜op)≃Funex​(𝒜,𝒮∞)≃FunL​(Ind⁡(𝒜),𝒮∞)\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\Ind({\mathcal{A}}),{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})

is the dual of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} and the coevaluation map

𝒮∞⟶Ind⁡(𝒜op)⊗Ind⁡(𝒜)≃Ind⁡(𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜)≃Funex​(𝒜​⊗^​𝒜op,𝒮∞){\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op})\otimes\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\simeq\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})

is given by formation of mapping spectra in 𝒜op{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}.

In analogy with the situation for dg-categories [21, §4], this allow us to obtain the following characterization of the dualizable objects.

0NK4

Theorem 3.7. An idempotent-complete small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is dualizable (as an object of the symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} of idempotent-complete small stable ∞\infty-categories) if and only if 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is smooth and proper. Moreover, the dual of a dualizable object 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is its opposite ∞\infty-category 𝒜op{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}.

0NK5

Proof. By the proceeding discussion, Ind⁡(𝒜)\Ind({\mathcal{A}}) is a dualizable object of 𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}} with dual Ind⁡(𝒜op)\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op}). Thus the dual of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} in Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} is 𝒜op{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}, and 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is dualizable in Cat∞perf≃𝒫​rStLω\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\simeq{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}}_{\omega} if and only if the evaluation and coevaluation maps lie in the subcategory 𝒫​rStLω⊂𝒫​rSt,cgL{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}}_{\omega}\subset{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St,cg}}}. But the evaluation map

Ind⁡(𝒜​⊗^​𝒜op)≃Ind⁡(𝒜)⊗Ind⁡(𝒜)∗⟶Ind⁡(𝒮∞ω)≃𝒮∞\Ind({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}^{\op})\simeq\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\otimes\Ind({\mathcal{A}})^{*}\longrightarrow\Ind({\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega})\simeq{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}

is induced by the mapping spectrum functor Map𝒜:𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜⟶𝒮∞\mathrm{Map}_{\mathcal{A}}\colon{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} in 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}; dually, the coevaluation map

𝒮∞≃Ind⁡(𝒮∞ω)⟶Ind⁡(𝒜op)⊗Ind⁡(𝒜)≃Ind⁡(𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜){\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}\simeq\Ind({\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega})\longrightarrow\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op})\otimes\Ind({\mathcal{A}})\simeq\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}})

given by the map 𝒮∞⟶Ind⁡(𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜){\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}\longrightarrow\Ind({\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}) which classifies 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} as an 𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}-module. Hence the evaluation map lies in this subcategory if and only if the mapping spectra 𝒜⁡(a,b){\mathcal{A}}(a,b) in 𝒜\mathcal{A} are compact, and the coevaulation map lies in this subcategory if and only if 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is a compact 𝒜op​⊗^​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}^{\op}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{A}}-module. Therefore, by definition, 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is a dualizable object of Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} if and only if 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} is smooth and proper. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4