ScalingStacks

9.5. Non-connective KK-theory of connective ring spectra

In this section, we show that for a connective ring spectrum RR, the non-connective KK-theory spectrum we associate to the category of perfect RR-modules has negative homotopy groups determined by the classical non-connective KK-theory spectrum of the ring π0​R\pi_{0}R.

We give a proof using a model of non-connective KK-theory for connective ring spectra based on the construction of a “suspension ring spectrum” coupled with Quillen’s plus construction. We begin by recalling Wagoner’s construction [83] of the non-connective KK-theory of an ordinary ring RR. Given a ring RR, we let ℓ​R\ell R denote the ring of locally finite (countably) infinite matrices in RR — i.e., ℕ×ℕ{\mathbb{N}}\times{\mathbb{N}} matrices such that each row and column only has finitely many nonzero elements. We let m​RmR denote the finite matrices, regarded as a 2-sided ideal of ℓ​R\ell R — these are the matrices with only finitely many nonzero elements. Then we can form the quotient ring μ​R=ℓ​R/m​R\mu R=\ell R/mR, and Wagoner defines the non-connective KK-theory spectrum to have nnth space

K​(R)n=K0​(μn​R)×B​G​L+​(μn​R).K(R)_{n}=K_{0}(\mu^{n}R)\times BGL^{+}(\mu^{n}R).

It is known that this construction agrees with other possible constructions of the non-connective algebraic KK-theory spectrum of RR (e.g., see [63, §6]).

Next, we recall the generalization of this construction to connective ring spectra. Prior to the invention of modern notions of structured ring spectra, May initiated the study of the algebraic KK-theory of a multiplicative object called an “A∞A_{\infty} ring space”, which is an E∞E_{\infty} space with a suitably compatible A∞A_{\infty} multiplication (for a particular pair of operads) [55, 72]. The prototype example of an A∞A_{\infty} ring space is Ω∞​R\Omega^{\infty}R for a connective ring spectrum RR [55, 3.1]. Fiedorowicz, Schwänzl, Steiner, and Vogt [33] extended Wagoner’s constructions by defining m​RmR and ℓ​R\ell R for A∞A_{\infty} ring spaces (using the work of [72] to define matrices with entries in A∞A_{\infty} ring spaces), and then defining μ​R\mu R to be the homotopy cofiber of the inclusion m​R→ℓ​RmR\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\ell R. Furthermore, they prove that there is an equivalence of spaces

(9.37) K0​(π0​(R))×B​G​L+​(R)≃Ω⁡(K0​(π0​(μ​R))×B​G​L+​(μ​R)).\displaystyle K_{0}(\pi_{0}(R))\times BGL^{+}(R)\simeq\Omega(K_{0}(\pi_{0}(\mu R))\times BGL^{+}(\mu R)).

These constructions then allow a definition of the non-connective algebraic KK-theory of an A∞A_{\infty} ring space RR with spaces

(9.38) I​K​(R)n=K0​(μn​π0​R)×B​G​L+​(μn​R).\displaystyle I\mspace{-6.mu}K(R)_{n}=K_{0}(\mu^{n}\pi_{0}R)\times BGL^{+}(\mu^{n}R).

This definition implies that for an A∞A_{\infty} ring space RR, the natural map R→π0​RR\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\pi_{0}R induces an isomorphism on the algebraic KK-groups I​K−n​(R):=K0​(μn​π0​R)I\mspace{-6.mu}K_{-n}(R):=K_{0}(\mu^{n}\pi_{0}R) for n≥0n\geq 0 [33, 1.1].

Our approach involves constructing a variant of the “suspension ring” construction that allows a construction of a non-connective KK-theory spectrum which agrees with the non-connective KK-theory of the ring space Ω∞​R\Omega^{\infty}R as defined in equation 9.38 on πi\pi_{i} for i<0i<0 and is equivalent to our version of the the non-connective KK-theory I​K​(R):=I​K​(R^perf)I\mspace{-6.mu}K(R):=I\mspace{-6.mu}K(\widehat{R}_{\perf}) spectrum constructed in definition 9.6. Since π0​Ω∞​R≅π0​R\pi_{0}\Omega^{\infty}R\cong\pi_{0}R, this equivalence implies the desired comparison.

We begin by recalling the definition of the plus construction introduced in [86], extended to A∞A_{\infty} ring spectra. For convenience, we model A∞A_{\infty} ring spectra as EKMM SS-algebras. We write Mn​R=mapR⁡(R∨n,R∨n)M_{n}R=\map_{R}(R^{\lor n},R^{\lor n}) for the space of RR-module endomorphisms of (a cofibrant replacement of) R∨nR^{\lor n}, and write G​Ln​(R)→Mn​(R)GL_{n}(R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}M_{n}(R) for the full subspace of RR-module automorphisms of R∨nR^{\lor n}; that is, we have a (homotopy) pullback of spaces

G​Ln​(R)\textstyle{GL_{n}(R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Mn​(R)\textstyle{M_{n}(R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}G​Ln​(π0​R)\textstyle{GL_{n}(\pi_{0}R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Mn​(π0​R)≅π0​Mn​(R).\textstyle{M_{n}(\pi_{0}R)\cong\pi_{0}M_{n}(R).}

Since G​Ln​(R)GL_{n}(R) is a topological monoid, after replacing to ensure the inclusion of the unit is a cofibration, we can form its classifying space B​G​Ln​(R)BGL_{n}(R). Moreover, there are natural inclusions G​Ln​(R)→G​Ln+1​(R)GL_{n}(R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}GL_{n+1}(R) which induce maps B​G​Ln​(R)→B​G​Ln+1​(R)BGL_{n}(R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}BGL_{n+1}(R). We can form

B​G​L​(R)≅hocolimn⁡B​G​Ln​(R).BGL(R)\cong\hocolim_{n}BGL_{n}(R).

Since π1​B​G​L​(R)≅G​L​(π0​R)\pi_{1}BGL(R)\cong GL(\pi_{0}R), we can form the plus construction B​G​L​(R)+BGL(R)^{+}, and one could define the KK-theory space to be the infinite loop space K0​(π0​R)×B​G​L​(R)+K_{0}(\pi_{0}R)\times BGL(R)^{+}. The consistency of this definition is proved in [32, 7.1], which we restate below:

0NQ9

Lemma 9.39. Let RR be a connective A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum. There is an equivalence of infinite loop spaces

Ω∞​K​(R)≃K0​(π0​R)×B​G​L​(R)+.\Omega^{\infty}K(R)\simeq K_{0}(\pi_{0}R)\times BGL(R)^{+}.

This is consistent in the sense that a check of the definition of the plus construction for an A∞A_{\infty} space [55, §7] now yields the following proposition:

0NQA

Proposition 9.40. For a connective ring spectrum RR, the connective algebraic KK-theory space B​G​L​(R)+BGL(R)^{+} is equivalent to the algebraic KK-theory space B​G​L+​(Ω∞​R)BGL^{+}(\Omega^{\infty}R).

We now set up analogues of the constructions of [33]. In order to ensure that our mapping spaces and spectra have the correct homotopy type, we continue to work with the category of EKMM algebra and module spectra. Since all objects are fibrant, it then suffices to work with cofibrant modules. For a connective ring spectrum RR, in the following we let MapR​(x,y)\mathrm{Map}_{R}(x,y) denote the mapping spectrum between objects xx and yy and mapR⁡(x,y)\map_{R}(x,y) the mapping space (which can be computed as Ω∞​Map​(x,y)\Omega^{\infty}\mathrm{Map}(x,y)) in the category of RR-modules. Moreover, when we write R∨nR^{\lor n} inside a mapping object, we will tacitly mean the wedge of a cofibrant replacement of RR as an RR-module.

0NQB

Definition 9.41. Let RR be a connective A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum. We set

M​R=colimn⁡MapR​(R∨n,R∨n),MR=\colim_{n}\mathrm{Map}_{R}(R^{\lor n},R^{\lor n}),

the nonunital A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum of finite RR-valued matrices. We write L​RLR for the A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum of locally finite matrices, i.e. the connective A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum obtained as the homotopy pullback

L​R\textstyle{LR\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}EndR⁡(R∨∞)\textstyle{\End_{R}(R^{\lor\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}H​ℓ​π0​R\textstyle{H\ell\pi_{0}R\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}H​Endπ0​R⁡(π0​R∨∞),\textstyle{H\End_{\pi_{0}R}(\pi_{0}R^{\lor\infty}),}

where here HH denotes the Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum functor.

0NQC

Remark 9.42. These definitions are consistent with the those of mm and ℓ\ell of [33] in the case of a ringlike A∞A_{\infty} space of [33] — one can construct equivalences Ω∞​M​R≃m⁡(Ω∞​R)\Omega^{\infty}MR\simeq m(\Omega^{\infty}R) and Ω∞​L​R≃ℓ⁡(Ω∞​R)\Omega^{\infty}LR\simeq\ell(\Omega^{\infty}R), although we leave the details to the interested reader, in order avoid a detailed discussion of the technology for A∞A_{\infty} ring spaces.

We now begin to prove the comparison theorem, theorem 9.53 below. As explained in [10, §15], without loss of generality we can work with categories enriched in EKMM SS-modules as a model for spectral categories, and we tacitly move between categories enriched in EKMM SS-modules and categories enriched in symmetric spectra in the following discussion.

Let FRF_{R} denote the spectral category of finitely generated free RR-modules. The theorem follows from proposition 9.51, which depends on the existence of a spectral category F~R∞\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}, equipped with a homotopically fully faithful spectral functor FR→F~R∞F_{R}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}, whose ∞\infty-category of modules has a generator GG such that π0\pi_{0} of the endomorphism ring spectrum of the image of G in the quotient category Ψ⁡(F~R∞)/Ψ⁡(FR)\Psi(\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R})/\Psi(F_{R}) is μ⁡(π0​Ω∞​R)\mu(\pi_{0}\Omega^{\infty}R). This approach to constructing analogues of μ⁡(Ω∞​R)\mu(\Omega^{\infty}R) is motivated by the explicit description of mapping spectra in the stable quotient (see [23, 1.3] for the dg-case and [10, §6] for the spectral analogue) and an idea from [63, 6.1].

We begin by giving a particular construction of such a spectral category. Roughly speaking, the idea is to adjoin the object R∨∞R^{\lor\infty} to FRF_{R} in such as way that the inclusion FR→F~R∞F_{R}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R} is fully faithful and Ψ⁡(F~R∞)\Psi(\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}) is generated by an object G=R∨∞G=R^{\lor\infty} such that π0​EndF~∞⁡(G)≅ℓ⁡(π0​Ω∞​R)\pi_{0}\End_{\tilde{F}^{\infty}}(G)\cong\ell(\pi_{0}\Omega^{\infty}R).

Recall that we denote by R^\widehat{R} the category of RR-modules, which we can regard as a spectral category. Let FRF_{R} denote the full spectral subcategory of R^\widehat{R} spanned by the finite free RR-modules R∨nR^{\lor n}, n∈ℕn\in\mathbb{N}, and let FR∞F^{\infty}_{R} denote the full spectral subcategory of R^\widehat{R} spanned by the finite free RR-modules as well as the countable wedge R∨∞≃colimn⁡R∨nR^{\lor\infty}\simeq\colim_{n}R^{\lor n}. The inclusion gives a fully faithful spectral functor i:FR→FR∞i\colon F_{R}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}F^{\infty}_{R}. The spectral category FR∞F^{\infty}_{R} is an intermediate construction that we will use to construct F~R∞\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}.

Write Ψ⁡(FR)\Psi(F_{R}) and Ψ⁡(FR∞)\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}) for the presentable stable ∞\infty-categories of FRF_{R}-modules and FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-modules, and let i!:Ψ(FR)→Ψ(FR∞)i_{!}\colon\Psi(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}) denote the left adjoint of the restriction i∗:Ψ⁡(FR∞)→Ψ⁡(FR)i^{*}\colon\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi(F_{R}). Given an RR-algebra AA, we will also write Ψ⁡(A)\Psi(A) for the stable ∞\infty-category of AA-modules.

0NQD

Proposition 9.43. The unit natural transformation Id→i∗i!\Id\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}i^{*}i_{!} is an equivalence.

0NQE

Proof. This is follows from the fact that i!:Ψ(FR)→Ψ(FR∞)i_{!}\colon\Psi(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}) is fully faithful, which in turn follows from the fact that ii is a fully faithful functor of spectral categories. ∎

Since i!i_{!} is fully faithful, we have an exact sequence of presentable stable ∞\infty-categories

Ψ⁡(FR)⟶Ψ⁡(FR∞)⟶𝒞,\Psi(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}},

where 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} denotes the cofiber of i!i_{!}. We can regard 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} as the full subcategory of Ψ⁡(FR∞)\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}) spanned by the local objects. In mild abuse of notation, for each 0≤n≤∞0\leq n\leq\infty, we will write R∨nR^{\lor n} for the FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-module represented by R∨nR^{\lor n}.

0NQF

Proposition 9.44. The FRF_{R}-module represented by any finite wedge R∨nR^{\lor n} is a compact generator of Ψ⁡(FR)\Psi(F_{R}) and the FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-module represented by the countably infinite wedge R∨∞R^{\lor\infty} is a compact generator of Ψ⁡(F∞​R)\Psi(F^{\infty}R). In particular, we have equivalences Ψ⁡(R)≃Ψ⁡(EndR⁡(R∨n))≃Ψ⁡(FR)\Psi(R)\simeq\Psi(\End_{R}(R^{\lor n}))\simeq\Psi(F_{R}) and Ψ⁡(EndR⁡(R∨∞))≃Ψ⁡(FR∞)\Psi(\End_{R}(R^{\lor\infty}))\simeq\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}).

0NQG

Proof. The statement about compact generators essentially follows by construction. Then the ∞\infty-categorical version of Schwede-Shipley’s Morita theorem [69], [53, §7.1.2], allows us to characterize these categories in terms of endomorphisms of the compact generator. ∎

Since i∗i!i^{*}i_{!} is equivalent to the identity, the counit map i!i∗R∨∞→R∨∞i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}R^{\lor\infty} restricts to an equivalence of FRF_{R}-modules. However, it is not an equivalence of FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-modules, since not all endomorphisms of R∨∞R^{\lor\infty} (e.g., the identity) factor through i!i∗R∨∞i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}.

The following proposition is standard; we restate it for convenience.

0NQH

Proposition 9.45. An FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-module MM is in the full subcategory 𝒞⊆Ψ⁡(FR∞){\mathcal{C}}\subseteq\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}) spanned by the local objects if and only if i∗​M≃0i^{*}M\simeq 0 in Ψ⁡(FR)\Psi(F_{R}). Similarly, a map of FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-modules f:M→M′f\colon M\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}M^{\prime} is a local equivalence if and only if the cofiber of ff lies in the essential image of i!i_{!}.

0NQI

Proof. The first claim follows from the fact that i∗​M≃0i^{*}M\simeq 0 if and only if for all FRF_{R}-modules NN, MapFR∞(i!N,M)≃0\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(i_{!}N,M)\simeq 0. In turn, this holds if and only if for any map of FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}-modules Q→PQ\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}P with cofiber of the form i!Ni_{!}N,

MapFR∞​(P,M)≃MapFR∞​(Q,M).\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(P,M)\simeq\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(Q,M).

The second claim follows from the fact that, if the cofiber of ff lies in the essential image of i!i_{!}, then for any local object LL, MapFR∞​(M′,L)≃MapFR∞​(M,L)\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(M^{\prime},L)\simeq\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(M,L). ∎

As a consequence, we can identify a compact generator of 𝒞{\mathcal{C}}.

0NQJ

Corollary 9.46. Let GG denote the cofiber of the counit i!i∗R∨∞→R∨∞i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}R^{\lor\infty} in Ψ⁡(FR∞)\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}). Then GG lies in the full subcategory 𝒞⊆Ψ⁡(FR∞){\mathcal{C}}\subseteq\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R}), i.e. GG is a local object, and the map R∨∞→GR^{\lor\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}G is a local equivalence. Furthermore, GG is a compact generator of 𝒞{\mathcal{C}}.

0NQK

Proof. By the previous proposition, GG is a local object, and the cofiber

Σi!i∗R∨∞≃i!Σi∗R∨∞\Sigma i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}\simeq i_{!}\Sigma i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}

of R∨∞→GR^{\lor\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}G is in the image of i!i_{!}. GG is compact because R∨∞R^{\lor\infty} is a compact generator of FR∞F^{\infty}_{R} and the functor Ψ⁡(FR∞)→𝒞\Psi(F^{\infty}_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}} preserves compact objects [70, 2.9]. ∎

This suggests that we might consider End𝒞⁡(G)\End_{{\mathcal{C}}}(G), regarded as an A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum under composition, as an analogue of μ^​R\hat{\mu}R. Note that by corollary 9.46, End𝒞⁡(G)≃MapF∞​R​(R∨∞,G)\End_{{\mathcal{C}}}(G)\simeq\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}R}(R^{\lor\infty},G) is equivalent to the cofiber (in spectra) of the map

MapFR∞(R∨∞,i!i∗R∨∞)⟶MapFR∞(R∨∞,R∨∞).\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor\infty},i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor\infty},R^{\lor\infty}).

However, since π0​(MapFR∞​(R∨∞,R∨∞))\pi_{0}(\mathrm{Map}_{F^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor\infty},R^{\lor\infty})) can be identified as the collection of infinite matrices with values in π0​(R)\pi_{0}(R) that have finitely many elements per row, we need to perform a construction analogous to definition 9.41.

Let

π0​F~R∞⟶π0​FR∞\pi_{0}\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\pi_{0}F_{R}^{\infty}

denote the subcategory of π0​FR∞\pi_{0}F_{R}^{\infty} consisting of those maps

f∈π0​Map​(R∨m,R∨n)≅Homπ0​R⁡(π0​R∨m,π0​R∨n),f\in\pi_{0}\mathrm{Map}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})\cong\Hom_{\pi_{0}R}(\pi_{0}R^{\lor m},\pi_{0}R^{\lor n}),

for 0≤m,n≤∞0\leq m,n\leq\infty, which are locally finite when regarded as elements of the group of π0​R\pi_{0}R-valued m×nm\times n-matrices. Since the composition induces on π0\pi_{0} the product of matrices and products of locally finite matrices are locally finite, this specification does indeed define a subcategory of π0​FR∞\pi_{0}F_{R}^{\infty}. Furthermore, π0​F~R∞\pi_{0}\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty} inherits an enrichment over abelian groups from that of π0​FR∞\pi_{0}F_{R}^{\infty}. We now perform a categorical analogue of definition 9.41, using the Eilenberg-Mac Lane functor HH from categories enriched in abelian groups to spectral categories [69, 5.1.5].

0NQL

Lemma 9.47. The symmetric monoidal functor π0:Sp≥0→Ab\pi_{0}\colon\mathrm{Sp}_{\geq 0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Ab} is right adjoint to the Eilenberg-MacLane spectrum functor HH, which is lax symmetric monoidal. It induces a functor

π0:CatSp≥0⟶CatAb,\pi_{0}\colon\Cat_{\mathrm{Sp}_{\geq 0}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Cat_{\mathrm{Ab}},

from categories enriched in connective symmetric spectra to categories enriched in abelian groups with right adjoint HH.

Using this we obtain a morphism of spectral categories

H​π0​F~R∞⟶H​π0​FR∞.H\pi_{0}\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}H\pi_{0}F_{R}^{\infty}.

Note that for 0≤m,n<∞0\leq m,n<\infty, the induced map of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectra

MapH​π0​F~R∞​(R∨m,R∨n)⟶MapH​π0​FR∞​(R∨m,R∨n)\mathrm{Map}_{H\pi_{0}\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Map}_{H\pi_{0}F_{R}^{\infty}}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})

is an equivalence, as finite matrices are locally finite.

We now define spectral categories F~R∞\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R} and F~R\tilde{F}_{R} as the homotopy pullbacks

    F~R                 F~R∞                 H​π0​F~R∞          FR          FR∞          H​π0​FR∞    .\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 10.18977pt\hbox{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\vtop{\halign{\entry@#!@&&\entry@@#!@\cr&&\cr&&\crcr}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-9.05783pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\tilde{F}_{R}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 35.32172pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-24.19446pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 35.32172pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 81.6134pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 45.33562pt\raise-24.19446pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 81.6134pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{H\pi_{0}\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 101.28299pt\raise-24.19446pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern-10.18977pt\raise-31.52777pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{F_{R}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 34.18977pt\raise-31.52777pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 34.18977pt\raise-31.52777pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{F^{\infty}_{R}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 80.48146pt\raise-31.52777pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 80.48146pt\raise-31.52777pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{H\pi_{0}F^{\infty}_{R}}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces}}}}\ignorespaces.

Observe that F~R\tilde{F}_{R} and F~R∞\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R} have the same objects as FRF_{R} and FR∞F^{\infty}_{R}, respectively, but EndF~R∞⁡(R∨∞)≃L​R\End_{\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor\infty})\simeq LR.

0NQM

Proposition 9.48. The spectral functor F~R→FR\tilde{F}_{R}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}F_{R} is a weak equivalence of spectral categories, and there is an equivalence of A∞A_{\infty} ring spectra EndF~R∞⁡(R∨∞)≃L​R\End_{\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor\infty})\simeq LR.

0NQN

Proof. As the functor is actually surjective on objects, it is enough to show that it is fully faithful. This follows from the fact that mapping spectra in the homotopy pullback spectral category are computed as the homotopy pullbacks of the mapping spectra. Applying the long exact sequence to the homotopy pullback

MapF~R∞​(R∨m,R∨n)\textstyle{\mathrm{Map}_{\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}MapFR∞​(R∨m,R∨n)\textstyle{\mathrm{Map}_{{F}^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}MapH​π0​F~R∞​(R∨m,R∨n)\textstyle{\mathrm{Map}_{H\pi_{0}\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}MapH​π0​FR∞​(R∨m,R∨n)\textstyle{\mathrm{Map}_{H\pi_{0}{F}^{\infty}_{R}}(R^{\lor m},R^{\lor n})}

implies the desired equivalence. A similar computation with m=n=∞m=n=\infty implies the second statement. ∎

The spectral functor F~R∞→FR∞\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}F^{\infty}_{R} induces a functor (which is not fully faithful)

Ψ⁡(F~R∞)⟶Ψ⁡(FR∞),\Psi(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi(F_{R}^{\infty}),

on ∞\infty-categories of modules.

Carrying out the same analysis as above, we see that the quotient

𝒞′=Ψ⁡(F~R∞)/Ψ⁡(FR){\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}=\Psi(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})/\Psi(F_{R})

can be described as modules over End𝒞′⁡(G′)\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime}), where G′G^{\prime} is the cofiber of the map

i!i∗R∨∞⟶R∨∞i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}R^{\lor\infty}

(here R∨∞R^{\lor\infty} is regarded as an object of F~R∞\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}) and hence as a spectrum End𝒞′⁡(G′)\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime}) is equivalent to the cofiber in spectra of the map

(9.49) MapΨ⁡(F~R∞)(R∨∞,i!i∗R∨∞)⟶EndΨ⁡(F~R∞)(R∨∞).\mathrm{Map}_{\Psi(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})}(R^{\lor\infty},i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\End_{\Psi(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})}(R^{\lor\infty}).
0NQP

Lemma 9.50. There is an equivalence of rings π0​(End𝒞′⁡(G′))≃π0​(μ​Ω∞​R)\pi_{0}(\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime}))\simeq\pi_{0}(\mu\Omega^{\infty}R).

0NQQ

Proof. Regarding F~R∞\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty} as a simplicial category, EndF~R∞⁡(R∞)\End_{\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}}(R^{\infty}) is (by construction) the A∞A_{\infty} ring space ℓ​R\ell R. Furthermore, we have that

π0(MapΨ⁡(F~R∞)(R∨∞,i!i∗R∨∞))≅π0(i!i∗R∨∞)≅mπ0R\pi_{0}(\mathrm{Map}_{\Psi(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})}(R^{\lor\infty},i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty}))\cong\pi_{0}(i_{!}i^{*}R^{\lor\infty})\cong m\pi_{0}R

and by construction

π0​(EndΨ⁡(F~R∞)⁡(R∨∞))≅ℓ​π0​R.\pi_{0}(\End_{\Psi(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})}(R^{\lor\infty}))\cong\ell\pi_{0}R.

Therefore, equation 9.49 implies that as groups there is an isomorphism

π0​(End𝒞′⁡(G′))≅ℓ⁡(π0​(R))/m⁡(π0​(R))≅ℓ⁡(π0​(Ω∞​R))/m⁡(π0​(Ω∞​R))\displaystyle\pi_{0}(\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime}))\cong\ell(\pi_{0}(R))/m(\pi_{0}(R))\cong\ell(\pi_{0}(\Omega^{\infty}R))/m(\pi_{0}(\Omega^{\infty}R))
≅μ​π0​(Ω∞​R)≅π0​(μ​Ω∞​R),\displaystyle\cong\mu\pi_{0}(\Omega^{\infty}R)\cong\pi_{0}(\mu\Omega^{\infty}R),

where the last isomorphism follows from [33, 5.1]. Finally, the universal property of the cofiber in spectra implies that there is a ring structure induced on π0​(End𝒞′⁡(G′))\pi_{0}(\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime})) induced by the ring structure on m​π0​(R)m\pi_{0}(R) quotiented by the two-sided ideal ℓ​π0​(R)\ell\pi_{0}(R). Inspection of π0\pi_{0} shows that this multiplication coincides with the ring structure on π0​(End𝒞′⁡(G′))\pi_{0}(\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime})) induced by composition. ∎

Based on this, we define

μ^​R≅End𝒞′⁡(G′),\hat{\mu}R\cong\End_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}(G^{\prime}),

using the setup described above, and we proceed to relate this suspension ring spectrum construction to an ∞\infty-categorical delooping. The basic idea is that our constructions of the suspension rings give (smaller) models of the ∞\infty-categorical cone ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} from definition 9.1 which are more closely related to the suspension ring spectrum μ^​R\hat{\mu}R.

0NQR

Proposition 9.51. Let RR be a connective A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum. We have a natural equivalence of spectra

K​(Ψtri​(μ^​R))\textstyle{K(\Psi_{\tri}(\hat{\mu}R))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}≃\scriptstyle{\simeq}K⁡((Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ/Ψperf​R)\textstyle{K((\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}/\Psi_{\perf}{R})}

for any infinite cardinal κ>ω\kappa>\omega.

0NQS

Proof. For any infinite cardinal κ>ω\kappa>\omega, there is a natural inclusion map

Ψperf​(FR∞)⟶(Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}

induced by the fact that any countable wedge of copies of RR is in (Ind⁡(Ψ​(R)perf))κ(\Ind(\Psi(R)_{\perf}))^{\kappa}, and the latter is closed under retracts and stable under finite colimits. Since the inclusion Ψperf​(FR)→Ψperf​(FR∞)\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty}) is compatible with the (Yoneda) inclusion Ψperf​(R)→(Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ\Psi_{\perf}(R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}, we have a commutative diagram

Ψperf​(FR)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}≃\scriptstyle{\simeq}Ψperf​(FR∞)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ψperf​(R)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ.\textstyle{(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}.}

Combining this with Ψperf​(F~R)→Ψperf​(F~R∞)\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}) we obtain the commutative diagram

(9.52) Ψperf​(F~R)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}≃\scriptstyle{\simeq}Ψperf​(F~R∞)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ψperf​(FR)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}≃\scriptstyle{\simeq}Ψperf​(FR∞)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ψperf​(R)\textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ.\textstyle{(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}.}

and hence an induced composite map of quotients

α:Ψperf​(F~R∞)/Ψperf​(FR)⟶Ψperf​(FR∞)/Ψperf​(FR)\displaystyle\alpha\colon\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})/\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})/\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})
⟶(Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ/Ψperf​(R).\displaystyle\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}/\Psi_{\perf}(R).

By the work above, α\alpha can be described as a map

Ψtri​(μ^​R)⟶(Ind⁡(Ψperf​(R)))κ/Ψperf​(R).\Psi_{\tri}(\hat{\mu}R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}/\Psi_{\perf}(R).

Finally, since FR∞F_{R}^{\infty} has countable coproducts, the usual Eilenberg swindle implies that K⁡(FR∞)K(F_{R}^{\infty}) is contractible. We also know that K⁡(Ψperf​(F~R∞)CLOSEK(\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty}) is contractible [33, 6.1,6.3]. Therefore, applying Map⁡(𝒰wlocκ¯​(𝒮∞ω),𝒰wlocκ¯​(−))\mathrm{Map}(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega}),\,\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}(-)) to the commutative diagram, the fact that all of the horizontal sequences are strict-exact allows us to apply theorem 9.10 to conclude that α\alpha induces an equivalence on KK-theory spectra. ∎

Proposition 9.51 allows us finally to establish the desired result.

0NQT

Theorem 9.53. Let RR be a connective A∞A_{\infty} ring spectrum. Then for i≤0i\leq 0, the natural map R→H​π0​RR\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}H\pi_{0}R induces isomorphisms πi​I​K​(R)→πi​I​K​(H​π0​R)≅πi​I​K​(π0​R)\pi_{i}I\mspace{-6.mu}K(R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\pi_{i}I\mspace{-6.mu}K(H\pi_{0}R)\cong\pi_{i}I\mspace{-6.mu}K(\pi_{0}R).

0NQU

Proof. Using the proof of proposition 9.51 and mimicking definition 9.6, we can define a spectrum

IK′(R):=colimnΩnK((Ψtri(μ^nR)).{I\mspace{-6.mu}K}^{{}^{\prime}}(R):=\colim_{n}\Omega^{n}K((\Psi_{\tri}(\hat{\mu}^{n}R)).

The conclusion of proposition 9.51 along with diagram 9.52 (which implies compatibility of the structure maps) yields an equivalence IK′(R)≃IK(R){I\mspace{-6.mu}K}^{{}^{\prime}}(R)\simeq I\mspace{-6.mu}K(R). By the argument for [70, 11.7], we see that we can compute the homotopy groups of IK′(R){I\mspace{-6.mu}K}^{{}^{\prime}}(R) using a fibrant model that is a spectrum with nnth space given by the space

Ω∞​K​(Ψperf​(μ^n​R)).\Omega^{\infty}K(\Psi_{\perf}(\hat{\mu}^{n}R)).

Lastly, lemma 9.39 and lemma 9.50 implies that there is an equivalence

Ω∞​K​(Ψperf​(μ^n​R))≃K0​(μn​π0​R)×B​G​L+​(μ^n​R).\Omega^{\infty}K(\Psi_{\perf}(\hat{\mu}^{n}R))\simeq K_{0}(\mu^{n}\pi_{0}R)\times BGL^{+}(\hat{\mu}^{n}R).

Therefore, for n>1n>1, π0​Ω∞​K​(Ψperf​(μ^n​R))\pi_{0}\Omega^{\infty}K(\Psi_{\perf}(\hat{\mu}^{n}R)) is K0​(μn​π0​R)=K−n​(π0​R)K_{0}(\mu^{n}\pi_{0}R)=K_{-n}(\pi_{0}R). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4