Theorem 1.11. (see theorem 3.7) An idempotent-complete small stable -category is dualizable (as an object of the symmetric monoidal -category ) if and only if is smooth and proper. Moreover, the dual of a dualizable idempotent-complete small stable -category is the opposite -category .
1.3. Symmetric monoidal structure and dualizable objects
The category is a symmetric monoidal -category (in the sense of [53, §2]), in which the tensor product is characterized by the property that maps out of correspond to maps out of the product which preserve colimits in each variable; see section 3 for a discussion of this structure, following the work of Lurie [53] and Ben-Zvi, Francis, and Nadler [8]. We will reserve a careful study of the structure of and as symmetric monoidal -categories for the forthcoming paper [9]. However, in order to carry out the extension of the non-connective co-representability theorem described in remark 1.8, we study the theory of dualizable objects in , using the theory of [53, §4.2.5].
In analogy with the situation for dg-categories [21, §4], we obtain a characterization of the dualizable objects in as the smooth and proper objects. We define these notions as follows. Implicit in the comparison between small stable -categories and spectral categories of theorem 1.10 is the fact that for objects and in a small stable -category there exists a natural mapping spectrum (see definition 2.15). Using this fact, we say that a small stable -category is proper if, for all pairs of objects and of , the mapping spectrum is compact. We say that a small stable -category is smooth if it is perfect as an -module. (Here we use the fact that any small stable -category can be regarded as a bimodule over itself.) We then have the following theorem characterizing the dualizable objects in these terms:
Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4