ScalingStacks

8.1. Additive κ\kappa-variant

Let

ψ:Cat∞perf⟶Pre⁡((Cat∞perf)κ,𝒮∞)\psi\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\longrightarrow\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa};{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})

be the functor obtained by first taking the Yoneda embedding and then restricting the presheaves to the ∞\infty-category (Cat∞ex)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa}. Corollary 5.24 allow us to choose a fixed set ℰAκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{\kappa}} of representatives of split-exact sequences in (Cat∞perf)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa}. We denote by ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} the localization of Pre⁡((Cat∞perf)κ,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa};{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) with respect to the set of maps

Cone⁡(ψ⁡(𝒜)⟶ψ⁡(𝒞))⟶ψ⁡(ℬ),\Cone(\psi({\mathcal{A}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\psi({\mathcal{C}}))\longrightarrow\psi({\mathcal{B}})\,,

where 𝒜→𝒞→ℬ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}} is a split-exact sequence in ℰAκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{\kappa}}. Let 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} be the following composite

Cat∞perf⟶ψPre⁡((Cat∞perf)κ,𝒮∞)⟶γℳaddκ¯,\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\psi}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa};{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}\,,

where γ\gamma is the localization functor.

0NNV

Proposition 8.3. The functor 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits and sends split-exact sequences

𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}i\scriptstyle{i}𝒞\textstyle{{\mathcal{C}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}j\scriptstyle{j}ℬ,\textstyle{{\mathcal{B}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\,,}g\scriptstyle{g}

in Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} to (split) cofiber sequences in ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}. Moreover, 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} is universal with respect to these two properties, i.e., given any stable presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

(𝒰addκ¯)∗:FunL​(ℳaddκ¯,𝒟)⟶∼Funadd¯κ​(Cat∞perf,𝒟),(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}})^{\ast}:\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}},{\mathcal{D}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Fun}_{\underline{\mathrm{add}}}^{\kappa}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the right-hand side denotes the full subcategory of Fun⁡(Cat∞ex,𝒟)\mathrm{Fun}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex},{\mathcal{D}}) of morphisms of ∞\infty-categories which satisfy the above two conditions.

0NNW

Proof. The result follows from the analogue of the argument for lemma 6.4 in the context of κ\kappa-compact objects and Indκ\Ind_{\kappa}, and from the universal property of Bousfield localization (see section 2.5 the functor ψ\psi preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits and proposition 5.27 shows that any split-exact sequence can be approximated by a κ\kappa-filtered colimit of split-exact sequences in ℰAκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{\kappa}}). ∎

Next, we localize ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} with respect to the set of maps

(8.4) Cone⁡(𝒰addκ¯​(𝒜)⟶𝒰addκ¯​(ℬ))⟶𝒰addκ¯​(ℬ/𝒜),\Cone\left(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}})\right)\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}})\,,

where 𝒜→ℬ→ℬ/𝒜{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} is a strict-exact sequence in ℰwLκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{wL}}^{\kappa}} (see section 5.5). Let 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} be the following composite

Cat∞perf⟶𝒰addκ¯ℳaddκ¯⟶γℳwlocκ¯,\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}\,,

where γ\gamma is the localization functor.

0NNX

Proposition 8.5. The functor 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits and sends strict-exact sequences to cofiber sequences in ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}

𝒜⟶ℬ⟶ℬ/𝒜\displaystyle{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} ↦\displaystyle\mapsto 𝒰wlocκ¯​(𝒜)⟶𝒰wlocκ¯​(ℬ)⟶𝒰wlocκ¯​(ℬ/𝒜).\displaystyle\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}})\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}})\,.

Moreover, 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} is universal with respect to these two properties, i.e., given any stable presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

(𝒰wlocκ¯)∗:FunL​(ℳwlocκ¯,𝒟)⟶∼Funwloc¯κ​(Cat∞perf,𝒟),(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}})^{\ast}\colon\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}},{\mathcal{D}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Fun}_{\underline{\mathrm{wloc}}}^{\kappa}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the right-hand side denotes the full subcategory of Fun⁡(Cat∞perf,𝒟)\mathrm{Fun}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}}) of morphisms of ∞\infty-categories which satisfy the above two conditions.

0NNY

Proof. The result follows from propositions 8.3 and 5.30, and from the universal property of localization (see section 2.5). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4