ScalingStacks

0NKS

Proposition 4.14. For any spectral category π’œ{\mathcal{A}}, Ξ·π’œ:π’œβ†’Mβ€‹π’œ\eta_{{\mathcal{A}}}\colon{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}M{\mathcal{A}} is fully faithful.

0NKT

Proof. By Yoneda’s lemma, mapping spectra in Mβ€‹π’œM{\mathcal{A}} between stably representable objects are given by mapping spectra between the representing spectrum objects, giving an equivalence

MapMβ€‹π’œβ€‹(Ξ·π’œβ€‹(a),Ξ·π’œβ€‹(b))n≃mapΞ¨triβ€‹π’œβ‘(a^,Ξ£n​b^).\mathrm{Map}_{M{\mathcal{A}}}(\eta_{{\mathcal{A}}}(a),\eta_{{\mathcal{A}}}(b))_{n}\simeq\map_{\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}}}(\widehat{a},{\Sigma^{n}}{\widehat{b}}).

Since Ξ¨triβ€‹π’œ\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}} is a stable ∞\infty-category of spectral functors, Yoneda’s lemma also gives an equivalence

Mapπ’œβ€‹(a,b)n≃mapΞ¨triβ€‹π’œβ‘(a^,Ξ£n​b^).\mathrm{Map}_{{\mathcal{A}}}(a,b)_{n}\simeq\map_{\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}}}(\widehat{a},{\Sigma^{n}}{\widehat{b}}).

Hence Mapπ’œβ€‹(a,b)≃MapMβ€‹π’œβ€‹(Ξ·π’œβ€‹(a),Ξ·π’œβ€‹(b))\mathrm{Map}_{{\mathcal{A}}}(a,b)\simeq\mathrm{Map}_{M{\mathcal{A}}}(\eta_{{\mathcal{A}}}(a),\eta_{{\mathcal{A}}}(b)). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4