ScalingStacks

8. Localization

The definition of additivity we study in this paper is given in terms of the condition that algebraic KK-theory takes models of split-exact sequences of triangulated categories to (homotopy) cofiber sequences of spectra. This perspective is motivated in part by Neeman’s reformulation of the Thomason-Trobaugh localization theorem [62]. Neeman observed that following Thomason-Trobaugh and using the construction of Bousfield localization, one could regard algebraic KK-theory as in fact taking exact sequences of triangulated categories to cofiber sequences of spectra, provided one worked with non-connective KK-theory (see Theorem 9.34 for a version of this result). We will refer to such a theory as satisfying localization. In this section we construct the universal localizing invariant of small stable ∞\infty-categories; see theorem 8.7. Our work follows the general pattern of the analogous result for dg-categories in [21].

0NNT

Definition 8.1. Let 𝒟{\mathcal{D}} be a stable presentable ∞\infty-category. A functor

E:Cat∞ex⟶𝒟E:\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{D}}

is called a localizing invariant of small stable ∞\infty-categories if it inverts Morita equivalences (see definition 2.14), preserves filtered colimits, and satisfies localization, i.e., sends exact sequences

𝒜⟶ℬ⟶𝒞{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{C}}

of small stable ∞\infty-categories (see definition 5.12) to cofiber sequences

E⁡(𝒜)⟶E⁡(ℬ)⟶E⁡(𝒞)E({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow E({\mathcal{B}})\longrightarrow E({\mathcal{C}})

in 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}. We denote by Funloc​(Cat∞ex,𝒟)\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex},{\mathcal{D}}) the ∞\infty-category of localizing invariants with values in 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}.

Every localizing invariant is an additive invariant (see definition 6.1), since a split-exact sequence is exact. The converse does not hold, however: the impetus for the definition of non-connective KK-theory was precisely the fact that the connective algebraic KK-theory functor does not satisfy localization. As we discuss in sections 9 and 10, non-connective algebraic KK-theory (I​KI\mspace{-6.mu}K) and topological Hochschild homology (T​H​HTHH) are localizing invariants.

Although the universal localizing invariant can be constructed by direct localization, as in additive analogue of section 6, we use a more involved procedure:

  1. (i)

    First, we construct a variant of the universal additive invariant; see proposition 8.3. We work with a general infinite regular cardinal κ\kappa, and we do not factor through Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}; that is, Morita equivalences are not inverted. This produces the functor

    𝒰addκ¯:Cat∞ex⟶ℳaddκ¯.\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}.
  2. (ii)

    We localize ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} so that the exact sequences

    𝒜⟶ℬ⟶ℬ/𝒜,{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}\,,

    with Ho⁡(𝒜)\Ho({\mathcal{A}}) a thick triangulated subcategory of Ho⁡(ℬ)\Ho({\mathcal{B}}), are sent to cofiber sequences; see proposition 8.5. We then obtain the functor

    𝒰wlocκ¯:Cat∞ex⟶ℳwlocκ¯.\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}.
  3. (iii)

    We perform a localization of ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} to force Morita equivalences to be sent to isomorphisms; see proposition 8.6. We obtain then the functor

    𝒰locκ:Cat∞ex⟶ℳlocκ.{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}.
  4. (iv)

    Finally, we localize ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} so that the functor 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} preserves filtered colimits; see theorem 8.7. We end up with the universal localizing invariant

    𝒰loc:Cat∞ex⟶ℳloc.{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}.

The point of this seemingly circuitous process is that it enables a clear, conceptual proof of the co-representability of non-connective KK-theory in ℳloc{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}; see section 9.

0NNU

Notation 8.2. From now on and until the end of section 9 we will work with a fixed infinite regular cardinal κ\kappa larger than ω\omega. We will denote by (Cat∞ex)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa} the category of κ\kappa-compact small stable ∞\infty-categories (see §2.4).

8.1. Additive κ\kappa-variant

Let

ψ:Cat∞perf⟶Pre⁡((Cat∞perf)κ,𝒮∞)\psi\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\longrightarrow\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa};{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})

be the functor obtained by first taking the Yoneda embedding and then restricting the presheaves to the ∞\infty-category (Cat∞ex)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa}. Corollary 5.24 allow us to choose a fixed set ℰAκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{\kappa}} of representatives of split-exact sequences in (Cat∞perf)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa}. We denote by ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} the localization of Pre⁡((Cat∞perf)κ,𝒮∞)\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa};{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) with respect to the set of maps

Cone⁡(ψ⁡(𝒜)⟶ψ⁡(𝒞))⟶ψ⁡(ℬ),\Cone(\psi({\mathcal{A}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\psi({\mathcal{C}}))\longrightarrow\psi({\mathcal{B}})\,,

where 𝒜→𝒞→ℬ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}} is a split-exact sequence in ℰAκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{\kappa}}. Let 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} be the following composite

Cat∞perf⟶ψPre⁡((Cat∞perf)κ,𝒮∞)⟶γℳaddκ¯,\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\psi}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa};{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}\,,

where γ\gamma is the localization functor.

0NNV

Proposition 8.3. The functor 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits and sends split-exact sequences

𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}i\scriptstyle{i}𝒞\textstyle{{\mathcal{C}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}j\scriptstyle{j}ℬ,\textstyle{{\mathcal{B}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\,,}g\scriptstyle{g}

in Cat∞perf\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} to (split) cofiber sequences in ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}. Moreover, 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} is universal with respect to these two properties, i.e., given any stable presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

(𝒰addκ¯)∗:FunL​(ℳaddκ¯,𝒟)⟶∼Funadd¯κ​(Cat∞perf,𝒟),(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}})^{\ast}:\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}},{\mathcal{D}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Fun}_{\underline{\mathrm{add}}}^{\kappa}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the right-hand side denotes the full subcategory of Fun⁡(Cat∞ex,𝒟)\mathrm{Fun}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex},{\mathcal{D}}) of morphisms of ∞\infty-categories which satisfy the above two conditions.

0NNW

Proof. The result follows from the analogue of the argument for lemma 6.4 in the context of κ\kappa-compact objects and Indκ\Ind_{\kappa}, and from the universal property of Bousfield localization (see section 2.5 the functor ψ\psi preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits and proposition 5.27 shows that any split-exact sequence can be approximated by a κ\kappa-filtered colimit of split-exact sequences in ℰAκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{\kappa}}). ∎

Next, we localize ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} with respect to the set of maps

(8.4) Cone⁡(𝒰addκ¯​(𝒜)⟶𝒰addκ¯​(ℬ))⟶𝒰addκ¯​(ℬ/𝒜),\Cone\left(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}})\right)\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}})\,,

where 𝒜→ℬ→ℬ/𝒜{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} is a strict-exact sequence in ℰwLκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{wL}}^{\kappa}} (see section 5.5). Let 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} be the following composite

Cat∞perf⟶𝒰addκ¯ℳaddκ¯⟶γℳwlocκ¯,\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}\,,

where γ\gamma is the localization functor.

0NNX

Proposition 8.5. The functor 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits and sends strict-exact sequences to cofiber sequences in ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}

𝒜⟶ℬ⟶ℬ/𝒜\displaystyle{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} ↦\displaystyle\mapsto 𝒰wlocκ¯​(𝒜)⟶𝒰wlocκ¯​(ℬ)⟶𝒰wlocκ¯​(ℬ/𝒜).\displaystyle\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}})\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}})\,.

Moreover, 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} is universal with respect to these two properties, i.e., given any stable presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

(𝒰wlocκ¯)∗:FunL​(ℳwlocκ¯,𝒟)⟶∼Funwloc¯κ​(Cat∞perf,𝒟),(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}})^{\ast}\colon\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}},{\mathcal{D}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Fun}_{\underline{\mathrm{wloc}}}^{\kappa}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the right-hand side denotes the full subcategory of Fun⁡(Cat∞perf,𝒟)\mathrm{Fun}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}}) of morphisms of ∞\infty-categories which satisfy the above two conditions.

0NNY

Proof. The result follows from propositions 8.3 and 5.30, and from the universal property of localization (see section 2.5). ∎

8.2. Morita equivalences

We now localize ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} with respect to the set of maps

𝒰wlocκ¯​(𝒜⟶Idem⁡(𝒜)),\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}\left({\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow\Idem({\mathcal{A}})\right)\,,

where 𝒜→Idem⁡(𝒜){\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Idem({\mathcal{A}}) belongs to ℰLκ{\mathcal{E}}^{\kappa}_{\mathrm{L}}. Let 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} be the following composition

Cat∞ex⟶𝒰wlocκ¯ℳwlocκ¯⟶γℳlocκ,\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}}}{{\longrightarrow}}\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}\,,

where γ\gamma is the localization functor.

0NNZ

Proposition 8.6. The functor 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} inverts Morita equivalences, preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits, and sends exact sequences to cofiber sequences in ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}

𝒜⟶ℬ⟶𝒞\displaystyle{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{C}} ↦\displaystyle\mapsto 𝒰locκ​(𝒜)⟶𝒰locκ​(ℬ)⟶𝒰locκ​(𝒞).\displaystyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{B}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{C}})\,.

Moreover, 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} is universal with respect to these two properties, i.e., given any stable presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

(𝒰locκ)∗:FunL​(ℳlocκ,𝒟)⟶∼Funlocκ​(Cat∞ex,𝒟),({\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa})^{\ast}\colon\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}({\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa},{\mathcal{D}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the right-hand side denotes the full subcategory of Fun⁡(Cat∞ex,𝒟)\mathrm{Fun}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex},{\mathcal{D}}) of morphisms of ∞\infty-categories which satisfy the above three conditions.

0NP0

Proof. The fact that 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits is clear. Since a functor 𝒜→ℬ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}} is a Morita equivalence if and only if Idem⁡(𝒜)→Idem⁡(ℬ)\Idem({\mathcal{A}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Idem({\mathcal{B}}) is an equivalence, proposition 5.31 allow us to conclude that 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} inverts Morita equivalences. We now show that 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} sends exact sequences to cofiber sequences. Let

𝒜⟶ℬ⟶𝒞{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{C}}

be an exact sequence. Since we have an induced Morita equivalence ℬ/𝒜→𝒞{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}}, it suffices to show that 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} sends exact sequences of shape

𝒜⟶ℬ⟶ℬ/𝒜{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}

to cofiber sequences in ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}. Since Idem:Cat∞ex→Cat∞perf\Idem:\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf} is a localization, it commutes with colimits and therefore the right-hand vertical map in the diagram

𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℬ\textstyle{{\mathcal{B}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℬ/𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Idem⁡(𝒜)\textstyle{\Idem({\mathcal{A}})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Idem⁡(ℬ)\textstyle{\Idem({\mathcal{B}})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Idem⁡(ℬ)/Idem⁡(𝒜),\textstyle{\Idem({\mathcal{B}})/\Idem({\mathcal{A}})\,,}

is a Morita equivalence. The bottom line is a strict-exact sequence, and so we conclude that 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} sends exact sequences to cofiber sequences. Finally, the universality of 𝒰locκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} follows from propositions 8.3 and 8.5, and from the universal property of localization (see section 2.5). ∎

8.3. Universal localizing invariant

We denote by ℰL{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{L}} the set of maps in ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} of shape

colim𝛼​𝒰locκ​(𝒜α)⟶𝒰locκ​(𝒜),\underset{\alpha}{\mathrm{colim}}\,{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha})\longrightarrow\ {\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}})\,,

where {𝒜α}\{{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}\} is a filtered diagram of objects in (Cat∞ex)ω(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\omega} whose colimit is a κ\kappa-compact small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. Localize ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} with respect to the set ℰL{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{L}}. Let 𝒰loc{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}} be the following composition

Cat∞ex⟶𝒰locκℳlocκ⟶γℳloc,\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}\,,

where γ\gamma is the localization functor.

0NP1

Theorem 8.7. The functor 𝒰loc{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}} is the universal localizing invariant, i.e., given any stable presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒟{\mathcal{D}}, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

(𝒰loc)∗:FunL​(ℳloc,𝒟)⟶∼Funloc​(Cat∞ex,𝒟).({\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}})^{\ast}\colon\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}({\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}},{\mathcal{D}})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex},{\mathcal{D}})\,.
0NP2

Proof. Let us denote by ℳaddκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} the small stable ∞\infty-category constructed as in section 6 but where we use (Cat∞perf)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa} instead of (Cat∞perf)ω(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega}. Similarly to 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} we have a well-defined functor 𝒰addκ:Cat∞ex→ℳaddκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} and so by performing a localization analogous to the one of subsection 8.3 (with ℰA{\mathcal{E}}_{A} instead of ℰL{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{L}}) we obtain a small stable ∞\infty-category which we denote by ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} and a composed functor

𝒰addω:Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addκℳaddκ⟶γℳaddω.{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}\,.

Let us start by showing that ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with ℳadd{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}} and that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}. For this (and because of the universal property of 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} and 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}) it suffices to show that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} preserves filtered colimits. Consider the composite

(Cat∞perf)ω↪(Cat∞perf)κ⊂Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addκℳaddκ.(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega}\hookrightarrow(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa}\subset\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\,.

It inverts Morita equivalences and sends split-exact sequences to split cofiber sequences. By the construction of ℳadd{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}} we obtain then an additive invariant Cat∞ex→ℳaddκ\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} and hence by the universal property of 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} a colimit preserving functor Φ:ℳadd→ℳaddκ\Phi\colon{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} and a natural transformation η:Φ∘𝒰add⇒𝒰addκ\eta\colon\Phi\circ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}\Rightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}. We now observe that the two functors

Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addκℳaddκ⟶γℳaddω\displaystyle\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addℳadd⟶Φℳaddκ⟶γℳaddω\displaystyle\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\Phi}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}

agree. Since they preserve κ\kappa-filtered colimits and every object in Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex} can be expressed as a κ\kappa-filtered colimit of κ\kappa-small objects, it suffices to show that they agree for every κ\kappa-compact small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. The stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} can be expressed as a filtered colimit colim𝛼​(𝒜α)→𝒜\underset{\alpha}{\mathrm{colim}}({\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}, with 𝒜α∈(Cat∞ex)ω{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}\in(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\omega}, and the evaluation of the natural transformation η\eta at 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} identifies with

colim𝛼​𝒰addκ​(𝒜α)⟶𝒰addκ​(𝒜).\underset{\alpha}{\mathrm{colim}}\,\,{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}})\,.

Since these map belongs to ℰA{\mathcal{E}}_{A}, they become invertible in ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}, and so we conclude that the above two functors agree. Since the one on the right-hand side preserves filtered colimits we conclude that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} also preserves filtered colimits. This shows that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} (and hence that ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with ℳadd{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}). Now, let ℳlocω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} be the category defined as ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} but with κ\kappa replaced by ω\omega. Clearly, the associated functor 𝒰locω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} is the universal localizing invariant and so in order to conclude the proof of Theorem 8.7 it suffices to show that ℳloc{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}} agrees with ℳlocω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} and that 𝒰loc{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}} agrees with 𝒰locω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega}. Starting with ℳaddκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} we can perform the following two localizations

ℳaddκ⟶ℳlocκ⟶ℳlocω\displaystyle{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} ℳaddκ⟶ℳaddω≃ℳadd⟶ℳloc.\displaystyle{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}\simeq{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}\,.

Since these localizations are independent of the order in which they are performed, our claim follows and so the proof is finished. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4