Proof. Let us denote by the small stable -category
constructed as in section 6 but where we use
instead of . Similarly
to we have a well-defined functor
and so by performing a
localization analogous to the one of subsection 8.3
(with instead of ) we obtain a small stable
-category which we denote by and a composed
functor
|
|
|
Let us start by showing that agrees with
and that agrees with . For this (and because of
the universal property of and ) it suffices to
show that preserves filtered colimits. Consider the
composite
|
|
|
It inverts Morita equivalences and sends
split-exact sequences to split cofiber sequences. By the construction
of we obtain then an additive invariant
and hence by the universal property of
a colimit preserving functor
and a natural transformation
. We
now observe that the two functors
|
|
|
|
|
agree. Since they preserve -filtered colimits and every object
in can be expressed as a -filtered colimit of
-small objects, it suffices to show that they agree for every
-compact small stable -category
. The stable -category can be expressed as a filtered colimit
, with
, and the evaluation of the
natural transformation at identifies with
|
|
|
Since these map belongs to , they become invertible in
, and so we conclude that the above two functors
agree. Since the one on the right-hand side preserves filtered
colimits we conclude that also preserves filtered
colimits. This shows that agrees with (and
hence that agrees with ). Now, let
be the category defined as but
with replaced by . Clearly, the associated functor
is the universal localizing invariant and so in order
to conclude the proof of Theorem 8.7 it suffices to
show that agrees with and that
agrees with . Starting with we can
perform the following two localizations
|
|
|
|
|
Since these localizations are independent of the order in which they
are performed, our claim follows and so the proof is finished.
∎