In order to construct the non-connective -theory spectrum associated
to a small stable -category, we use a generalization of the
axiomatic framework due to Schlichting [70]. For an
uncountable regular cardinal , we will produce functors
and from to such that for any
small stable category :
(i)
is contractible,
(ii)
there are natural transformations
such that is exact,
(iii)
the functors and preserve exact sequences,
(iv)
and and preserve -filtered colimits in
.
The idea is that is a “-theoretic cone” and so
is a “suspension” of . Fix an uncountable regular
cardinal , and for a stable -category recall from
Section 2.4 that denotes the
-compact objects in .
Remark 9.2. One might wish to simply use as the cone
construction; however, this will rarely turn out to be a small
-category, whereas passing to the -compact objects yields
an (essentially) small -category by construction.
Observe that is a composite functor
(9.3)
By construction and Propositions 5.6
and 5.9, we have an exact sequence
which is natural in small stable -categories . Next, we
check that satisfies property (i) above.
Proof.Since is uncountable, has countable coproducts,
and so the usual Eilenberg swindle argument implies that the identity
map is null-homotopic on -theory and so its -theory vanishes.
Specifically, the functor defined
by is exact. Moreover, there is a natural
equivalence of exact functors induced by the
equivalence . Applying
-theory, we can split off the component of the resulting equivalence of spectra and deduce that the identity of
is null-homotopic.
∎
We must check that and
preserve exact sequences of small stable -categories.
Proof.It suffices to show the result for , as the statement
for follows because colimits commute.
Thus, we need to verify that
is exact. The sequence
is exact by Definition 5.12 and
Proposition 5.15. Now the result follows from
Proposition 5.17.
∎
Passing to the triangulated homotopy category by composing with the
functor , we get a series of functors which satisfies
Schlichting’s setup of [70, §2.2] and so produces negative
-groups. Furthermore, we can define the non-connective -theory spectrum as
follows, following [70, §12].
Definition 9.6. Let be a small stable -category. Its non-connective
-theory spectrum is given by
Here, stands for the -theory spectrum of §7.1, and
the structure maps are induced from the exact sequences
Schlichting’s axiomatic framework implies that this construction
agrees with his when both are defined, and therefore we deduce from
his comparison results [70, §8] that the non-connective
-theory spectrum of Definition 9.6 agrees with
the various classical constructions of non-connective -theory
spectra.
Finally, we establish the final technical condition; this will be
needed in the following sections.
Proof.Recall that is the composite (9.3). Hence, the claim follows from the
fact that the passage to and to -compact objects
preserves -filtered colimits [52, 5.5.7.8, 5.5.7.10,
5.5.7.11]. Since is the cofiber of the inclusion
and colimits commute, we deduce that
preserves -filtered colimits if does.
∎