ScalingStacks

9.1. Non-connective KK-theory of ∞\infty-categories

In order to construct the non-connective KK-theory spectrum associated to a small stable ∞\infty-category, we use a generalization of the axiomatic framework due to Schlichting [70]. For an uncountable regular cardinal κ\kappa, we will produce functors ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} and Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} from Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex} to Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex} such that for any small stable ∞\infty category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}:

  1. (i)

    K⁡(ℱκ​𝒜)K({\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}) is contractible,

  2. (ii)

    there are natural transformations

    Id⟶ℱκ⟶Σκ\Id\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Sigma_{\kappa}

    such that 𝒜→ℱκ​𝒜→Σκ​𝒜{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} is exact,

  3. (iii)

    the functors ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} and Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} preserve exact sequences,

  4. (iv)

    and ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} and Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} preserve κ\kappa-filtered colimits in Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}.

The idea is that ℱκ​𝒜{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} is a “KK-theoretic cone” and so Σκ​𝒜\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} is a “suspension” of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. Fix an uncountable regular cardinal κ\kappa, and for a stable ∞\infty-category 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} recall from Section 2.4 that 𝒞κ{\mathcal{C}}^{\kappa} denotes the κ\kappa-compact objects in 𝒞{\mathcal{C}}.

0NP3

Definition 9.1. Using proposition 2.18, we define ℱκ​𝒜=(Indω⁡(𝒜))κ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}=(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{A}}))^{\kappa} and Σκ​𝒜\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} to be the cofiber (Indω⁡(𝒜))κ/𝒜(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{A}}))^{\kappa}/{\mathcal{A}}.

0NP4

Remark 9.2. One might wish to simply use Indω⁡𝒜\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{A}} as the cone construction; however, this will rarely turn out to be a small ∞\infty-category, whereas passing to the κ\kappa-compact objects yields an (essentially) small ∞\infty-category by construction.

Observe that ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} is a composite functor

(9.3) Cat∞ex⟶𝒫​rStLω⟶Cat∞ex⁡(κ)⟶Cat∞ex.\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{{\mathcal{P}\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{St}}}_{\omega}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex(\!\kappa)}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}.

By construction and Propositions 5.6 and 5.9, we have an exact sequence

𝒜⟶ℱκ​𝒜⟶Σκ​𝒜,{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}},

which is natural in small stable ∞\infty-categories 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. Next, we check that ℱκ​𝒜{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} satisfies property (i) above.

0NP5

Lemma 9.4. Let 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} be a small stable ∞\infty-category. Then K⁡(ℱκ​𝒜)K({\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}) is trivial.

0NP6

Proof. Since κ\kappa is uncountable, ℱκ​𝒜{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} has countable coproducts, and so the usual Eilenberg swindle argument implies that the identity map is null-homotopic on KK-theory and so its KK-theory vanishes. Specifically, the functor F:ℱκ​𝒜→ℱκ​𝒜F\colon{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} defined by X↦∐ℕXX\mapsto\coprod_{{\mathbb{N}}}X is exact. Moreover, there is a natural equivalence of exact functors id∐F≃F\id\coprod F\simeq F induced by the equivalence X​∐(∐ℕX)≃∐ℕXX\coprod(\coprod_{{\mathbb{N}}}X)\simeq\coprod_{{\mathbb{N}}}X. Applying KK-theory, we can split off the FF component of the resulting equivalence of spectra and deduce that the identity of ℱκ​𝒜{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} is null-homotopic. ∎

We must check that ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} and Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} preserve exact sequences of small stable ∞\infty-categories.

0NP7

Proposition 9.5. Let 𝒜→ℬ→𝒞{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}} be an exact sequence of small stable ∞\infty-categories. Then the induced sequences

ℱκ​𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℱκ​ℬ\textstyle{{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{B}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℱκ​𝒞\textstyle{{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{C}}}Σκ​𝒜\textstyle{\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Σκ​ℬ\textstyle{\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{B}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Σκ​𝒞\textstyle{\Sigma_{\kappa}{\mathcal{C}}}

are exact.

0NP8

Proof. It suffices to show the result for ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}, as the statement for Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} follows because colimits commute. Thus, we need to verify that

(Indω⁡(𝒜))κ⟶(Indω⁡(ℬ))κ⟶(Indω⁡(𝒞))κ(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{A}}))^{\kappa}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{B}}))^{\kappa}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{C}}))^{\kappa}

is exact. The sequence

Indω⁡𝒜⟶Indω⁡ℬ⟶Indω⁡𝒞\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{C}}

is exact by Definition 5.12 and Proposition 5.15. Now the result follows from Proposition 5.17. ∎

Passing to the triangulated homotopy category by composing with the functor Ho\Ho, we get a series of functors which satisfies Schlichting’s setup of [70, §2.2] and so produces negative KK-groups. Furthermore, we can define the non-connective KK-theory spectrum as follows, following [70, §12].

0NP9

Definition 9.6. Let 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} be a small stable ∞\infty-category. Its non-connective KK-theory spectrum I​K​(𝒜)I\mspace{-6.mu}K({\mathcal{A}}) is given by

I​K​(𝒜):=colimn⁡Ωn​K​(Σκ(n)​(𝒜)).I\mspace{-6.mu}K({\mathcal{A}}):=\colim_{n}\Omega^{n}K(\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}))\,.

Here, KK stands for the KK-theory spectrum of §7.1, and the structure maps are induced from the exact sequences

Σκ(n)​(𝒜)⟶ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜)⟶Σκ(n+1)​(𝒜)n≥0.\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n+1)}({\mathcal{A}})\qquad n\geq 0\,.

Schlichting’s axiomatic framework implies that this construction agrees with his when both are defined, and therefore we deduce from his comparison results [70, §8] that the non-connective KK-theory spectrum of Definition 9.6 agrees with the various classical constructions of non-connective KK-theory spectra.

Finally, we establish the final technical condition; this will be needed in the following sections.

0NPA

Lemma 9.7. The functors ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} and Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} preserve κ\kappa-filtered colimits.

0NPB

Proof. Recall that ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} is the composite (9.3). Hence, the claim follows from the fact that the passage to Indκ\Ind_{\kappa} and to κ\kappa-compact objects preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits [52, 5.5.7.8, 5.5.7.10, 5.5.7.11]. Since Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} is the cofiber of the inclusion 𝒜→ℱκ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} and colimits commute, we deduce that Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits if ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa} does. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4