ScalingStacks

4.2. Spectral enrichment of stable โˆž\infty-categories

The mapping spaces of a stable โˆž\infty-category ๐’ž{\mathcal{C}} are naturally the underlying spaces of mapping spectra, as discussed in sectionย 2.3. We now use this to construct a cofibrant and fibrant spectral category ฮฅโก(๐’ž)\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) whose underlying โˆž\infty-category Nโก(ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฅโ€‹(๐’ž))\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})) is equivalent to ๐’ž\mathcal{C}. Indeed, the simplicial category of presheaves of spectra

Funฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})

on the associated (cofibrant) simplicial category โ„ญโก[๐’ž]\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}] is simultaneously a simplicial model category as well as a spectral category, where the spectral enrichment is inherited from the spectral structure on ๐’ฎ{\mathcal{S}} itself. Moreover, we have an equivalence

Nโก(Funฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)cf)โ€‹[Wโˆ’1]โ‰ƒFunโก(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž),\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf})[W^{-1}]\simeq\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}),

so it makes sense to ask whether or not a given presheaf of spectra is stably representable (in the underlying โˆž\infty-category Funโก(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})).

0NKG

Definition 4.7. Let

ฮฅโก(๐’ž)โŠ‚Funฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})\subset\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})

denote the full spectral subcategory spanned by those (projectively) cofibrant and fibrant functors which are stably representable.

0NKH

Proposition 4.8. For a small stable โˆž\infty-category ๐’ž\mathcal{C}, there is a natural equivalence of โˆž\infty-categories ๐’žโ†’Nโก(ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฅโ€‹(๐’ž))\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})).

0NKI

Proof. The spectral Yoneda embedding

๐’žโŸถFunโก(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)โ‰ƒNโก(Funฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)cf)\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\simeq\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf})

is adjoint to a simplicial functor

OPENโ„ญโก[๐’ž]โŸถFunฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)cf)\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf})

which evidently factors through the full simplicial subcategory ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฅโ€‹(๐’ž)\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) spanned by the stably representable functors. The map ๐’žโ†’Nโก(ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฅโ€‹(๐’ž))\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})) is the adjoint of the resulting map โ„ญโก[๐’ž]โ†’ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฅโ€‹(๐’ž)\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}).

To see that this map is an equivalence, we observe first that it is essentially surjective: indeed, a stably representable cofibrant and fibrant functor X:โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]opโ†’๐’ฎX\colon\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}} is necessarily of the form Xโ‰ƒMapโก(โˆ’,A)X\simeq\mathrm{Map}(-,A) for some spectrum object A={ai}A=\{a_{i}\} of ๐’žโ‰ƒNโก(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]fib)\mathcal{C}\simeq\mathrm{N}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\mathrm{fib}}). Since ๐’ž\mathcal{C} is stable, aiโ‰ƒฮฃiโ€‹aa_{i}\simeq\Sigma^{i}a for some object aa of ๐’ž\mathcal{C}, so XX is in the image of ๐’ž\mathcal{C} (which sends aa to the presheaf represented by ฮฃโˆžโ€‹a\Sigma^{\infty}a). This map is also fully faithful, because if aa and bb are any pair of objects of ๐’ž\mathcal{C}, then

mapโก(ฮฃโˆžโ€‹b,ฮฃโˆžโ€‹a)โ‰ƒmapโก(b,ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฃโˆžโ€‹a)โ‰ƒmapโก(b,a)\map(\Sigma^{\infty}b,\Sigma^{\infty}a)\simeq\map(b,\Omega^{\infty}\Sigma^{\infty}a)\simeq\map(b,a)

since aโ‰ƒฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฃโˆžโ€‹aa\simeq\Omega^{\infty}\Sigma^{\infty}a. โˆŽ

We have the following description of ฮฅ\Upsilon in terms of the stable Yoneda embedding.

0NKJ

Proposition 4.9. Let ๐’ž\mathcal{C} be a small stable โˆž\infty-category. The fully-faithful inclusion

ฮฅโก(๐’ž)โŸถFunฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})

factors, on the level of underlying โˆž\infty-categories, as the composite

Nโก(ฮฉโˆžโ€‹ฮฅโ€‹(๐’ž))โ‰ƒ๐’žโ†’Funexโ€‹(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)\displaystyle\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}))\simeq\mathcal{C}\rightarrow\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) ฯ‰
โІFunโก(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)\displaystyle\subseteq\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) โ‰ƒNFunฮ”โ€‹(โ„ญโ€‹[๐’ž]op,๐’ฎ)cfโ€‹[Wโˆ’1].\displaystyle\simeq\mathrm{N}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf}[W^{-1}].
0NKK

Proof. Any stably representable functor ๐’žopโ†’๐’ฎโˆž\mathcal{C}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} is exact, giving the factorization

๐’žโŸถFunexโ€‹(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)โІFunโก(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž).\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\subseteq\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).

By proposition 3.2, we may rewrite this as ๐’žโ†’Indโก(๐’ž)โ‰ƒFunexโ€‹(๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind(\mathcal{C})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) to see that, as an exact functor ๐’žopโ†’๐’ฎโˆž\mathcal{C}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}, any stably representable functor is also compact. โˆŽ

Our model of Cat๐’ฏex\Cat^{\ex}_{\mathcal{T}} allows us to check that the construction of ฮฅ\Upsilon induces a simplicial functor:

0NKL

Proposition 4.10. The assignment which associates to the stable simplicial category ๐’ž\mathcal{C} the spectral category ฮฅโก(๐’ž)\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) defines a simplicial functor

ฮฅ:Cat๐’ฏexโŸถLHโ€‹(Cat๐’ฎ)\Upsilon\colon\Cat^{\ex}_{\mathcal{T}}\longrightarrow L^{H}(\Cat_{\mathcal{S}})

and hence a functor of โˆž\infty-categories

Nโก(ฮฅ):CatโˆžexโŸถNโก((LHโ€‹(Cat๐’ฎ))fib).\mathrm{N}(\Upsilon)\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\longrightarrow\mathrm{N}((L^{H}(\Cat_{\mathcal{S}}))^{\mathrm{fib}}).
0NKM

Proof. We first check that the construction of ฮฅ\Upsilon induces a functor Cat๐’ฏexโ†’Cat๐’ฎ\Cat^{\ex}_{\mathcal{T}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Cat_{\mathcal{S}}. Let f:๐’žโ†’๐’Ÿf\colon{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{D}} be a map of stable simplicial categories and write

f!cf:Funฮ”(๐’žop,๐’ฎ)cfโŸถFunฮ”(๐’Ÿop,๐’ฎ)cff_{!}^{\mathrm{cf}}\colon\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{cf}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}({\mathcal{D}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{cf}}

for the induced spectral functor. Suppose that X:๐’žopโ†’๐’ฎX\colon\mathcal{C}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}} is projectively cofibrant and fibrant and that Nโก(X):Nโ€‹(๐’ž)opโ†’๐’ฎโˆž\mathrm{N}(X)\colon\mathrm{N}(\mathcal{C})^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} is stably representable via the spectrum object A={ai}A=\{a_{i}\} in Nโ€‹๐’ž\mathrm{N}\mathcal{C}. Since the diagram

Nโ€‹๐’ž\textstyle{\mathrm{N}\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Nโ€‹๐’Ÿ\textstyle{\mathrm{N}{\mathcal{D}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Funโก(Nโ€‹๐’žop,๐’ฎโˆž)\textstyle{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathrm{N}\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Funโก(Nโ€‹๐’Ÿop,๐’ฎโˆž)\textstyle{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathrm{N}{\mathcal{D}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})}

commutes (where the vertical maps are the stable Yoneda embeddings), we see that f!f_{!} restricts to a spectral functor ฮฅโก(๐’ž)โ†’ฮฅโก(๐’Ÿ)\Upsilon({\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Upsilon({\mathcal{D}}).

To verify that ฮฅ\Upsilon induces a simplicial functor, we must check that it preserves equivalences of stable simplicial categories. So suppose that f:๐’žโ†’๐’Ÿf\colon\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{D}} is an equivalence of stable simplicial categories. Then it follows that f!cff_{!}^{\mathrm{cf}} is a DK-equivalence of spectral categories, as is its restriction to the stably representable objects. โˆŽ

0NKN

Proposition 4.11. Let ๐’œ{\mathcal{A}} be a spectral category. Then there are natural equivalences of compactly-generated stable โˆž\infty-categories

Nโก(Fun๐’ฎโ€‹(๐’œop,๐’ฎ)c)โ€‹[Wโˆ’1]โ‰ƒIndโก(ฮจtriโ€‹๐’œ)โ‰ƒFunexโ€‹(ฮจtriโ€‹๐’œop,๐’ฎโˆž).\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}]\simeq\Ind(\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).
0NKP

Proof. The first equivalence follows from the definition of ฮจtriโ€‹๐’œ\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}} as the smallest stable subcategory of the stable โˆž\infty-category Nโก(Fun๐’ฎโ€‹(๐’œop,๐’ฎ)c)โ€‹[Wโˆ’1]\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}] containing the representables, together with the observations that Nโก(Fun๐’ฎโ€‹(๐’œop,๐’ฎ)c)โ€‹[Wโˆ’1]\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}] is compactly generated with compact objects

ฮจperfโ€‹๐’œโ‰ƒNโก(Fun๐’ฎโ€‹(๐’œop,๐’ฎ)c)โ€‹[Wโˆ’1]ฯ‰\Psi_{\perf}{\mathcal{A}}\simeq\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}]^{\omega}

and Indโก(ฮจtriโ€‹๐’œ)โ‰ƒIndโก(ฮจperfโ€‹๐’œ)\Ind(\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}})\simeq\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}{\mathcal{A}}) (as Ind\Ind-categories are automatically idempotent-complete). The second equivalence follows immediately from proposition 3.2. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4