4.2. Spectral enrichment of stable โ \infty -categories
The mapping spaces of a stable โ \infty -category ๐ {\mathcal{C}} are naturally the underlying spaces of mapping spectra , as discussed in sectionย 2.3 .
We now use this to construct a cofibrant and fibrant
spectral category ฮฅ โก ( ๐ ) \Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) whose underlying โ \infty -category
N โก ( ฮฉ โ โ ฮฅ โ ( ๐ ) ) \mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})) is equivalent to ๐ \mathcal{C} . Indeed, the
simplicial category of presheaves of spectra
Fun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) \mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})
on the associated (cofibrant) simplicial category โญ โก [ ๐ ] \mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]
is simultaneously a simplicial model category as well as a spectral
category, where the spectral enrichment is inherited from the
spectral structure on ๐ฎ {\mathcal{S}} itself.
Moreover, we have an equivalence
N โก ( Fun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) cf ) โ [ W โ 1 ] โ Fun โก ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) , \mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf})[W^{-1}]\simeq\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}),
so it makes sense to ask whether or not a given presheaf of spectra is
stably representable (in the underlying โ \infty -category
Fun โก ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) \mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) ).
0NKG
Definition 4.7 . Let
ฮฅ โก ( ๐ ) โ Fun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) \Upsilon(\mathcal{C})\subset\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})
denote the full spectral subcategory spanned by those (projectively)
cofibrant and fibrant functors which are stably representable.
0NKH
Proposition 4.8 . For a small stable โ \infty -category ๐ \mathcal{C} , there is a natural equivalence
of โ \infty -categories ๐ โ N โก ( ฮฉ โ โ ฮฅ โ ( ๐ ) ) \mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})) .
0NKI
Proof. The spectral Yoneda embedding
๐ โถ Fun โก ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) โ N โก ( Fun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) cf ) \mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\simeq\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf})
is adjoint to a simplicial functor
OPEN โญ โก [ ๐ ] โถ Fun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) cf ) \mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf})
which evidently factors through the full simplicial subcategory
ฮฉ โ โ ฮฅ โ ( ๐ ) \Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) spanned by the stably representable functors.
The map ๐ โ N โก ( ฮฉ โ โ ฮฅ โ ( ๐ ) ) \mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C})) is the adjoint of the resulting
map โญ โก [ ๐ ] โ ฮฉ โ โ ฮฅ โ ( ๐ ) \mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) .
To see that this map is an equivalence, we observe first that it is
essentially surjective: indeed, a stably representable cofibrant and
fibrant functor X : โญ โ [ ๐ ] op โ ๐ฎ X\colon\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}} is necessarily of the form
X โ Map โก ( โ , A ) X\simeq\mathrm{Map}(-,A) for some spectrum object A = { a i } A=\{a_{i}\} of
๐ โ N โก ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] fib ) \mathcal{C}\simeq\mathrm{N}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\mathrm{fib}}) . Since ๐ \mathcal{C} is stable,
a i โ ฮฃ i โ a a_{i}\simeq\Sigma^{i}a for some object a a of ๐ \mathcal{C} , so X X is in the
image of ๐ \mathcal{C} (which sends a a to the presheaf represented by
ฮฃ โ โ a \Sigma^{\infty}a ). This map is also fully faithful, because if a a
and b b are any pair of objects of ๐ \mathcal{C} , then
map โก ( ฮฃ โ โ b , ฮฃ โ โ a ) โ map โก ( b , ฮฉ โ โ ฮฃ โ โ a ) โ map โก ( b , a ) \map(\Sigma^{\infty}b,\Sigma^{\infty}a)\simeq\map(b,\Omega^{\infty}\Sigma^{\infty}a)\simeq\map(b,a)
since a โ ฮฉ โ โ ฮฃ โ โ a a\simeq\Omega^{\infty}\Sigma^{\infty}a .
โ
We have the following description of ฮฅ \Upsilon in terms of the stable
Yoneda embedding.
0NKJ
Proposition 4.9 . Let ๐ \mathcal{C} be a small stable โ \infty -category.
The fully-faithful inclusion
ฮฅ โก ( ๐ ) โถ Fun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) \Upsilon(\mathcal{C})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})
factors, on the level of underlying โ \infty -categories, as the composite
N โก ( ฮฉ โ โ ฮฅ โ ( ๐ ) ) โ ๐ โ Fun ex โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) \displaystyle\mathrm{N}(\Omega^{\infty}\Upsilon(\mathcal{C}))\simeq\mathcal{C}\rightarrow\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})
ฯ
โ Fun โก ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) \displaystyle\subseteq\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})
โ NFun ฮ โ ( โญ โ [ ๐ ] op , ๐ฎ ) cf โ [ W โ 1 ] . \displaystyle\simeq\mathrm{N}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathfrak{C}[\mathcal{C}]^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\cf}[W^{-1}].
0NKK
Proof. Any stably representable functor ๐ op โ ๐ฎ โ \mathcal{C}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} is exact, giving
the factorization
๐ โถ Fun ex โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) โ Fun โก ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) . \mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\subseteq\mathrm{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).
By proposition 3.2 , we may rewrite this as
๐ โ Ind โก ( ๐ ) โ Fun ex โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) \mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind(\mathcal{C})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) to see that, as an
exact functor ๐ op โ ๐ฎ โ \mathcal{C}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} , any stably representable functor is
also compact.
โ
Our model of Cat ๐ฏ ex \Cat^{\ex}_{\mathcal{T}} allows us to check that the construction
of ฮฅ \Upsilon induces a simplicial functor:
0NKL
Proposition 4.10 . The assignment which associates to the stable simplicial category ๐ \mathcal{C}
the spectral category ฮฅ โก ( ๐ ) \Upsilon(\mathcal{C}) defines a simplicial functor
ฮฅ : Cat ๐ฏ ex โถ L H โ ( Cat ๐ฎ ) \Upsilon\colon\Cat^{\ex}_{\mathcal{T}}\longrightarrow L^{H}(\Cat_{\mathcal{S}})
and hence a functor of โ \infty -categories
N โก ( ฮฅ ) : Cat โ ex โถ N โก ( ( L H โ ( Cat ๐ฎ ) ) fib ) . \mathrm{N}(\Upsilon)\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\longrightarrow\mathrm{N}((L^{H}(\Cat_{\mathcal{S}}))^{\mathrm{fib}}).
0NKM
Proof. We first check that the construction of ฮฅ \Upsilon induces a
functor Cat ๐ฏ ex โ Cat ๐ฎ \Cat^{\ex}_{\mathcal{T}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Cat_{\mathcal{S}} . Let f : ๐ โ ๐ f\colon{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{D}} be a map of
stable simplicial categories and write
f ! cf : Fun ฮ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ ) cf โถ Fun ฮ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ ) cf f_{!}^{\mathrm{cf}}\colon\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}(\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{cf}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Fun}_{\Delta}({\mathcal{D}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{cf}}
for
the induced spectral functor. Suppose that X : ๐ op โ ๐ฎ X\colon\mathcal{C}^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}} is
projectively cofibrant and fibrant and that N โก ( X ) : N โ ( ๐ ) op โ ๐ฎ โ \mathrm{N}(X)\colon\mathrm{N}(\mathcal{C})^{\op}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty} is
stably representable via the spectrum object A = { a i } A=\{a_{i}\} in N โ ๐ \mathrm{N}\mathcal{C} .
Since the diagram
N โ ๐ \textstyle{\mathrm{N}\mathcal{C}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} N โ ๐ \textstyle{\mathrm{N}{\mathcal{D}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} Fun โก ( N โ ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) \textstyle{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathrm{N}\mathcal{C}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} Fun โก ( N โ ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) \textstyle{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathrm{N}{\mathcal{D}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})}
commutes (where the vertical maps are the stable Yoneda
embeddings), we see that f ! f_{!} restricts to a spectral functor
ฮฅ โก ( ๐ ) โ ฮฅ โก ( ๐ ) \Upsilon({\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Upsilon({\mathcal{D}}) .
To verify that ฮฅ \Upsilon induces a simplicial functor, we must check
that it preserves equivalences of stable simplicial categories. So
suppose that f : ๐ โ ๐ f\colon\mathcal{C}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{D}} is an equivalence of stable simplicial
categories. Then it follows that f ! cf f_{!}^{\mathrm{cf}} is a
DK-equivalence of spectral categories, as is its restriction to the
stably representable objects.
โ
0NKN
Proposition 4.11 . Let ๐ {\mathcal{A}} be a spectral category.
Then there are natural equivalences of compactly-generated stable โ \infty -categories
N โก ( Fun ๐ฎ โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ ) c ) โ [ W โ 1 ] โ Ind โก ( ฮจ tri โ ๐ ) โ Fun ex โ ( ฮจ tri โ ๐ op , ๐ฎ โ ) . \mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}]\simeq\Ind(\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}).
0NKP
Proof. The first equivalence follows from the definition of ฮจ tri โ ๐ \Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}} as the smallest stable subcategory of the stable โ \infty -category N โก ( Fun ๐ฎ โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ ) c ) โ [ W โ 1 ] \mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}] containing the representables, together with the observations that N โก ( Fun ๐ฎ โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ ) c ) โ [ W โ 1 ] \mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}] is compactly generated with compact objects
ฮจ perf โ ๐ โ N โก ( Fun ๐ฎ โ ( ๐ op , ๐ฎ ) c ) โ [ W โ 1 ] ฯ \Psi_{\perf}{\mathcal{A}}\simeq\mathrm{N}(\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathcal{S}}({\mathcal{A}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}]^{\omega}
and Ind โก ( ฮจ tri โ ๐ ) โ Ind โก ( ฮจ perf โ ๐ ) \Ind(\Psi_{\tri}{\mathcal{A}})\simeq\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}{\mathcal{A}}) (as Ind \Ind -categories are automatically idempotent-complete).
The second equivalence follows immediately from proposition 3.2 .
โ