ScalingStacks

5.5. Strict-exact sequences

0NMN

Definition 5.28. An exact sequence of small stable ∞\infty-categories of the form

(5.29) π’œβŸΆβ„¬βŸΆβ„¬/π’œ{\mathcal{A}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}

is called strict-exact if π’œβ†’β„¬{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}} is the inclusion of a full subcategory and any object of ℬ{\mathcal{B}} which is a summand of an object of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} is also in π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. In particular, every split-exact sequence (see definitionΒ 5.18) is equivalent to a strict-exact exact sequence.

We denote by β„°wLΞΊΒ―\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{wL}}^{\kappa}} a set of representatives of strict-exact sequences π’œβ†’β„¬β†’β„¬/π’œ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} with ℬ{\mathcal{B}} in (Cat∞ex)ΞΊ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa}.

0NMP

Proposition 5.30. Any strict-exact sequence π’œβ†’β„¬β†’β„¬/π’œ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} is a ΞΊ\kappa-filtered colimit of strict-exact sequences π’œΞ±β†’β„¬Ξ±β†’β„¬Ξ±/π’œΞ±{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}/{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha} in β„°wLΞΊΒ―\underline{{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{wL}}^{\kappa}}.

0NMQ

Proof. Write ℬ≃colimα⁑ℬα{\mathcal{B}}\simeq\colim_{\alpha}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha} as a ΞΊ\kappa-filtered colimit of ΞΊ\kappa-compact stable ∞\infty-categories ℬα{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}, and define π’œΞ±=π’œΓ—β„¬β„¬Ξ±{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}={\mathcal{A}}\times_{\mathcal{B}}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha} to be the full subcategory of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} consisting of those objects of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} which lie in the image of ℬα{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}. Evidently, π’œβ†’β„¬β†’β„¬/π’œ{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}} is the ΞΊ\kappa-filtered colimit of the exact sequences π’œΞ±β†’β„¬Ξ±β†’β„¬Ξ±/π’œΞ±{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}/{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}, and π’œΞ±β†’β„¬Ξ±β†’β„¬Ξ±/π’œΞ±{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha}/{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha} is strict-exact because if Yβˆˆβ„¬Ξ±Y\in{\mathcal{B}}_{\alpha} is a summand of Xβˆˆπ’œΞ±X\in{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha} then Yβˆˆπ’œΞ±Y\in{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha} because the image of YY in ℬ{\mathcal{B}} lies in π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. ∎

We denote by β„°LΞΊ{\mathcal{E}}^{\kappa}_{\mathrm{L}} a set of representatives of maps of the form π’œβ†’Idem⁑(π’œ){\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Idem({\mathcal{A}}) with π’œ{\mathcal{A}} in (Cat∞ex)ΞΊ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa}.

0NMR

Proposition 5.31. Any map of the form π’œβ†’Idem⁑(π’œ){\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Idem({\mathcal{A}}) is a ΞΊ\kappa-filtered colimit of elements of β„°LΞΊ{\mathcal{E}}^{\kappa}_{\mathrm{L}}.

0NMS

Proof. Write π’œβ‰ƒcolimΞ±β‘π’œΞ±{\mathcal{A}}\simeq\colim_{\alpha}{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha} as a ΞΊ\kappa-filtered colimit of ΞΊ\kappa-compact small stable ∞\infty-categories π’œΞ±{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}. Then Idem⁑(π’œ)≃colimα⁑Idem⁑(π’œΞ±)\Idem({\mathcal{A}})\simeq\colim_{\alpha}\Idem({\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}), since Idem\Idem (viewed as an endofunctor of Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}) commutes with ΞΊ\kappa-filtered colimits β€” this follows from the characterization of Idem\Idem in terms of a subcategory of the Ind\Ind category [52, 5.4.2.4] and the fact that filtered colimits in Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex} can be computed in Cat∞\Cat_{\infty} [53, 1.1.4.6]. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4