Lemma 4.1. Let and be small spectral categories, and let be a DK-equivalence. Then the induced maps and are categorical equivalences of simplicial sets.
4.1. Stable envelopes of spectral categories
Given any spectral category , we can produce an -category by passing to the associated simplicial category, fibrantly replacing, and applying the simplicial nerve to obtain . This process yields a functor
from the category of small spectral categories to the category of simplicial sets. Precomposing with the functors and , we obtain functors
and a natural transformation . First, we observe that these functors are compatible with the weak equivalences of Theoremย 2.2.
Proof. If is a DK-equivalence, then one can check that gives a Quillen equivalence between the spectral model categories of -modules and the spectral model category of -modules. Passing to underlying simplicial categories of cofibrant and fibrant objects, we see that and are DK-equivalent simplicial categories. Finally, applying the simplicial nerve yields categorically equivalent simplicial sets. Restricting to various full subcategories yields the result for and . โ
Therefore, we have induced functors and connecting and , equipped with a natural transformation connecting them:
In fact, by construction these functors preserve triangulated and Morita equivalences respectively. Furthermore, lands in small stable -categories and lands in idempotent-complete stable -categories.
Lemma 4.2. factors through the subcategory , and factors through the subcategory .
Proof. As noted in remarkย 2.13, since is the underlying simplicial category associated to a pretriangulated spectral category, is characterized as the idempotent-completion of given by propositionย 3.2 coupled with corollaryย 3.3. Finally, note that maps of spectral categories induce, by left Kan extension, finite colimit-preserving on the level of stable -categories. โ
Consequently, we may regard as a functor and as a functor .
Remark 4.3. Using the machinery of combinatorial simplicial model categories, we can also localize the combinatorial model structure of corollaryย 2.4 on at the triangulated or Morita equivalences directly to obtain โtriangulatedโ or โMoritaโ simplicial model categories on small spectral categories and then pass to simplicial nerves; this is equivalent to localizing the -category .
The content of theoremย 1.10 is that these functors are equivalences. We prove this theorem by producing an โinverseโ to and such that the composite is a localization functor on . We begin with the following definition:
Definition 4.4. A simplicial category is stable if the simplicial nerve of a fibrant replacement of is a stable -category. A spectral category is stable if its underlying simplicial category is stable.
We have the following characterization of equivalences between stable spectral categories (see also [11, 5.7]).
Proposition 4.5. Let and be stable spectral categories. Then a spectral functor is a DK-equivalence if and only if
is an equivalence.
Proof. Certainly essential surjectivity is determined on the level of the homotopy category, so it suffices to show that, for all pairs of objects and of , for all integers whenever this is the case for . Since and are stable,
so this is immediate. โ
We write for the simplicial category of small stable simplicial categories. We can model this as the subcategory of the simplicial category of small simplicial categories where the objects are the stable simplicial categories and the mapping spaces are computed by restriction of vertices to those simplicial functors which represent exact functors upon passage to the simplicial nerve.
Proposition 4.6. The -category obtained by applying the simplicial nerve to (a fibrant replacement of) is equivalent to the -category . That is, the equivalence (induced by the simplicial nerve [52, 2.2.0.1])
restricts to an equivalence
Proof. It suffices to show that the mapping spaces in have the correct homotopy type, and this follows from the comparison between the mapping spaces of and [52, 2.2.0.1] and the fact that on both sides we define the mapping spaces by the same restriction of vertices. โ
Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4