ScalingStacks

10.3. T​CTC and the cyclotomic trace map

Much of the interest in the topological Dennis trace comes from the fact that the T​H​HTHH spectrum comes with an additional equivariant structure (generalizing the classical connection between the cyclic bar construction of a space and the free loop space) which allows a refinement into a theory called T​CTC, the topological cyclic homology. The topological Dennis trace lifts to a map

K⟶T​CK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC

called the cyclotomic trace map [17].

We will once again apply co-representability and point-set models to characterize the cyclotomic trace. However, when attempting to apply our co-representability results to T​CTC, we run into certain obstacles. Although T​CTC is Morita invariant and satisfies localization [10], it does not preserve filtered colimits and is therefore not a localizing (or additive) invariant. Nonetheless, we can adapt our results to characterize the cyclotomic trace in this setting.

We begin by recalling the definition of T​CTC in the context of spectral categories. Our review is brief; once again, we refer the interested reader to [11, §5] and [10, §4] for authoritative treatment. Fix a prime pp. For a spectral category 𝒞{\mathcal{C}}, we can realize T​H​H​(𝒞)THH({\mathcal{C}}) as a cyclotomic S1S^{1}-spectrum. It is convenient to use the Bokstedt model of T​H​HTHH, which is revised in detail in [10, §4]. Since the Bokstedt model is naturally weakly equivalent to Ncyc​Q​𝒞N^{\cyc}Q{\mathcal{C}} for any spectral category 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} [10, 3.1], we can leverage the work above. A cyclotomic structure is additional structure on an equivariant spectrum arising from the self-equivalence S1/H≅S1S^{1}/H\cong S^{1} (for finite H⊂S1H\subset S^{1}) that models the structure of the free loop space.

Roughly speaking, what we have is a set of compatible maps

ϕH​T⟶T\phi^{H}T\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}T

for finite H⊂S1H\subset S^{1}. The equivariant structure allows us to consider the associated non-equivariant spectra

T​Rn​(𝒞)=T​H​H​(𝒞)Cpn−1,TR^{n}({\mathcal{C}})=THH({\mathcal{C}})^{C_{p^{n-1}}},

the fixed points with respect to the induced Cpn−1C_{p^{n-1}} action. The inclusion of fixed points and the cyclotomic structure give rise to maps FF and RR respectively

F,R:T​Rn⟶T​Rn−1.F,R\colon TR^{n}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TR^{n-1}.

We define T​Cn​(𝒞)TC^{n}({\mathcal{C}}) to be the homotopy equalizer

holimF,R⁡T​Rn​(𝒞)⟶T​Rn−1​(𝒞).\holim_{F,R}TR^{n}({\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TR^{n-1}({\mathcal{C}}).

We then have that

T​C​(𝒞)=holimn⁡T​Cn​(𝒞),TC({\mathcal{C}})=\holim_{n}TC^{n}({\mathcal{C}}),

where we form the homotopy limit over the maps induced by the restriction RR; this definition is equivalent to the one originally given in [17].

The work of [10, §5] produces a description of T​H​H​(𝒞)THH({\mathcal{C}}) for a spectral category 𝒞{\mathcal{C}} as a cyclotomic spectrum, and hence constructions of T​RnTR^{n}, T​CnTC^{n}, and T​CTC. Moreover, a cyclotomic trace map K→T​CK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC is constructed which arises from compatible maps K→T​CnK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC^{n}. As above, we import these constructions into the setting of ∞\infty-categories. First, we have the following lemma:

0NR5

Lemma 10.7. The functors

T​Rn,T​Cn,T​C:Cat𝒮⟶𝒮TR^{n},TC^{n},TC\colon\Cat_{\mathcal{S}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathcal{S}

induces functors of ∞\infty-categories

T​Rn,T​Cn,T​C:Cat∞ex≃N⁡((Cat𝒮)c)​[W−1]⟶N⁡((𝒮)c)​[W−1]≃𝒮∞.TR^{n},TC^{n},TC\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\simeq\mathrm{N}((\Cat_{\mathcal{S}})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}]\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}((\mathcal{S})^{\mathrm{c}})[W^{-1}]\simeq{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}.
0NR6

Proof. By [10, 3.9], maps which induce equivalences on T​H​HTHH induce equivalences on T​RnTR^{n}, T​CnTC^{n}, and T​CTC. As a consequence, the result follows from lemma 10.1. ∎

Next, we observe that each of the objects T​CnTC^{n} provides a localizing invariant.

0NR7

Proposition 10.8. The functor T​CnTC^{n} is a localizing invariant of stable ∞\infty-categories with values in the stable ∞\infty-category of spectra.

0NR8

Proof. The localization theorem of [10, 7.1] implies {T​Cn​(𝒞)}\{TC^{n}({\mathcal{C}})\} takes strict-exact sequences of spectral categories to strict exact sequences of small stable ∞\infty-categories. Thus, we need to show that T​Rn​(𝒞)TR^{n}({\mathcal{C}}) preserve filtered colimits. We know this for T​H​HTHH, and the result now follows inductively from consideration of the fundamental cofibration sequence (e.g., [39, 2.1.4])

T​H​H​(𝒞)Cpn−1⟶T​Rn​(𝒞)⟶T​Rn−1​(𝒞)THH({\mathcal{C}})_{C_{p^{n-1}}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TR^{n}({\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TR^{n-1}({\mathcal{C}})

(where the left-hand term denotes the homotopy orbit space) and the fact that homotopy orbits commute with filtered colimits. ∎

The topological Dennis trace lifts through the constructions of T​CnTC^{n}, essentially by construction. Roughly speaking (see [11, 5.12] for a detailed construction), the trace is induced by an “inclusion of objects” map S∙​𝒞→T​H​H​(S∙​𝒞)S_{\bullet}{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}THH(S_{\bullet}{\mathcal{C}}), given by taking an object to its identity map in the 0-skeleton. Since the trace lands in the fixed set with respect to the spacewise S1S^{1}-action on the cyclotomic T​H​HTHH spectrum, it is compatible with the maps RR and FF (see e.g., [40, 1.2] for a more detailed discussion of this). Moreover, we can check that the trace descends to a natural transformation of localizing invariant using lemma 10.5.

0NR9

Lemma 10.9. The topological Dennis trace above induces a natural transformation of localizing invariants

K⟶T​Cn.K\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC^{n}.

Furthermore, the cyclotomic trace K→T​CK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC provides a natural transformation in this setting which is assembled from natural transformations of localizing invariants.

0NRA

Lemma 10.10. The natural transformations of localizing invariants

K⟶T​CnK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC^{n}

induce a natural transformation of spectrum-valued functors

K⟶T​Cn.K\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC^{n}.

Although T​C=holim⁡T​CnTC=\holim TC^{n} is not itself a localizing invariant (it does not preserve filtered colimits in general), any natural transformation of functors K→T​CK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC is equivalent to the data of compatible maps to each T​CnTC^{n}. Therefore, if we consider the spectrum of natural transformations of functors to spectra from K→T​CK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC which restrict to localizing invariants on each component, the spectrum is given by the limit (in the ∞\infty-category of spectra)

limnNat⁡(K⁡(−),T​Cn​(−)).\lim_{n}\Nat(K(-),TC^{n}(-)).

Finally, this yields the following characterization of the cyclotomic trace.

0NRB

Theorem 10.11. After pp-completion, the set of homotopy classes of compatible localizing invariants {K→TCn}\{K\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC^{n}\} is isomorphic to ℤp\mathbb{Z}_{p}. The cyclotomic trace is represented by 1∈ℤp1\in\mathbb{Z}_{p}.

0NRC

Proof. Using theorem 10.3 as in the proof of corollary 10.4, we see that the spectrum of natural transformations K→T​CK\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC which restrict to localizing invariants on each component can be computed as the limits (in the ∞\infty-category of spectra)

limnNat⁡(K⁡(−),T​Cn​(−))≃limnT​Cn​(𝕊)=T​C​(𝕊).\lim_{n}\Nat(K(-),TC^{n}(-))\simeq\lim_{n}TC^{n}(\mathbb{S})=TC(\mathbb{S}).

Completing at the prime pp, recall that T​C​(𝕊)≃𝕊∨Σ​C​P−1∞TC(\mathbb{S})\simeq\mathbb{S}\vee\Sigma CP^{\infty}_{-1} [68, §1]. Since π0​(Σ​C​P−1∞)=0\pi_{0}(\Sigma CP^{\infty}_{-1})=0, we deduce that the set of homotopy classes of compatible invariants is ℤp\mathbb{Z}_{p}. Furthermore, using the argument for theorem 10.6 and passing to the limit, we can identify the class of the cyclotomic trace by understanding the homotopy class of the composite

𝕊⟶K⁡(𝕊)⟶T​C​(𝕊)⟶T​H​H​(𝕊)≃𝕊\mathbb{S}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}K(\mathbb{S})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}TC(\mathbb{S})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}THH(\mathbb{S})\simeq\mathbb{S}

(after pp-completion). An elaboration of Waldhausen’s results [86, §5] (see [17, §5] or [68, §1]) implies that this homotopy class is the identity (i.e., the unit splits the trace T​C​(𝕊)→T​H​H​(𝕊)≃𝕊TC(\mathbb{S})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}THH(\mathbb{S})\simeq\mathbb{S}, which gives the identification of T​C​(𝕊)TC(\mathbb{S}) above), and so using the work of theorem 10.6 we again deduce that the cyclotomic trace is represented by the unit. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4