ScalingStacks

0NP5

Lemma 9.4. Let π’œ{\mathcal{A}} be a small stable ∞\infty-category. Then K⁑(β„±ΞΊβ€‹π’œ)K({\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}) is trivial.

0NP6

Proof. Since ΞΊ\kappa is uncountable, β„±ΞΊβ€‹π’œ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} has countable coproducts, and so the usual Eilenberg swindle argument implies that the identity map is null-homotopic on KK-theory and so its KK-theory vanishes. Specifically, the functor F:β„±ΞΊβ€‹π’œβ†’β„±ΞΊβ€‹π’œF\colon{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} defined by Xβ†¦βˆβ„•XX\mapsto\coprod_{{\mathbb{N}}}X is exact. Moreover, there is a natural equivalence of exact functors id∐F≃F\id\coprod F\simeq F induced by the equivalence Xβ€‹βˆ(βˆβ„•X)β‰ƒβˆβ„•XX\coprod(\coprod_{{\mathbb{N}}}X)\simeq\coprod_{{\mathbb{N}}}X. Applying KK-theory, we can split off the FF component of the resulting equivalence of spectra and deduce that the identity of β„±ΞΊβ€‹π’œ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}{\mathcal{A}} is null-homotopic. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4