ScalingStacks

0NP8

Proof. It suffices to show the result for ℱκ{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}, as the statement for Σκ\Sigma_{\kappa} follows because colimits commute. Thus, we need to verify that

(Indω⁡(𝒜))κ⟶(Indω⁡(ℬ))κ⟶(Indω⁡(𝒞))κ(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{A}}))^{\kappa}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{B}}))^{\kappa}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind_{\omega}({\mathcal{C}}))^{\kappa}

is exact. The sequence

Indω⁡𝒜⟶Indω⁡ℬ⟶Indω⁡𝒞\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Ind_{\omega}{\mathcal{C}}

is exact by Definition 5.12 and Proposition 5.15. Now the result follows from Proposition 5.17. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4