ScalingStacks

0NQ3

Theorem 9.34. Let π’œβ†’β„¬β†’π’ž{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}} be a sequence of DHKS-saturated Waldhausen categories with factorization such that

Ho⁑(N⁑(π’œ)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])⟢Ho⁑(N⁑(ℬ)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])⟢Ho⁑(N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])\Ho(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{A}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])\longrightarrow\Ho(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{B}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])\longrightarrow\Ho(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])

is a localization sequence of triangulated categories. Then the induced map

I​K​(π’œ)⟢I​K​(ℬ)⟢I​K​(π’ž)I\mspace{-6.mu}K({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow I\mspace{-6.mu}K({\mathcal{B}})\longrightarrow I\mspace{-6.mu}K({\mathcal{C}})

is a cofiber sequence of spectra.

0NQ4

Proof. This follows from the natural equivalence I​K​(βˆ’)≃I​K​(N⁑(βˆ’)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])I\mspace{-6.mu}K(-)\simeq I\mspace{-6.mu}K(\mathrm{N}(-)[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}]) and the fact that cofiber sequence

I​K​(N⁑(π’œ)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])⟢I​K​(N⁑(ℬ)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])⟢I​K​(N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])I\mspace{-6.mu}K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{A}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])\longrightarrow I\mspace{-6.mu}K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{B}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])\longrightarrow I\mspace{-6.mu}K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])

is a cofiber sequence because I​K​(βˆ’)I\mspace{-6.mu}K(-) is a localizing invariant. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4