ScalingStacks

0NMV

Lemma 6.4. Let π’Ÿ{\mathcal{D}} be a pointed presentable ∞\infty-category. Then, we have an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories

FunL​(Pre​((Cat∞perf)Ο‰)βˆ—,π’Ÿ)≃Funflt​(Cat∞perf,π’Ÿ),\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega})_{*},{\mathcal{D}})\simeq\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathrm{flt}}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the right-hand side denotes the ∞\infty-category of morphisms of ∞\infty-categories which preserve filtered colimits.

0NMW

Proof. The proof is a consequence of the equivalences

FunL​(Pre​((Cat∞perf)Ο‰)βˆ—,π’Ÿ)\displaystyle\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}(\mathrm{Pre}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega})_{*},{\mathcal{D}}) ≃Fun⁑((Cat∞perf)Ο‰,π’Ÿ)\displaystyle\simeq\mathrm{Fun}((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega},{\mathcal{D}})
≃Funflt​(Ind⁑((Cat∞perf)Ο‰),π’Ÿ)\displaystyle\simeq\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathrm{flt}}(\Ind((\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega}),{\mathcal{D}})
≃Funflt​(Cat∞perf,π’Ÿ),\displaystyle\simeq\mathrm{Fun}_{\mathrm{flt}}(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf},{\mathcal{D}})\,,

where the first follows from [52, 5.1.5.6] and the fact that π’Ÿ{\mathcal{D}} is pointed, and the last follows from corollaryΒ 4.25. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4