ScalingStacks

0NP2

Proof. Let us denote by ℳaddκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} the small stable ∞\infty-category constructed as in section 6 but where we use (Cat∞perf)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa} instead of (Cat∞perf)ω(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega}. Similarly to 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} we have a well-defined functor 𝒰addκ:Cat∞ex→ℳaddκ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} and so by performing a localization analogous to the one of subsection 8.3 (with ℰA{\mathcal{E}}_{A} instead of ℰL{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{L}}) we obtain a small stable ∞\infty-category which we denote by ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} and a composed functor

𝒰addω:Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addκℳaddκ⟶γℳaddω.{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}\colon\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}\,.

Let us start by showing that ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with ℳadd{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}} and that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}. For this (and because of the universal property of 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} and 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}) it suffices to show that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} preserves filtered colimits. Consider the composite

(Cat∞perf)ω↪(Cat∞perf)κ⊂Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addκℳaddκ.(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega}\hookrightarrow(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\kappa}\subset\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\,.

It inverts Morita equivalences and sends split-exact sequences to split cofiber sequences. By the construction of ℳadd{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}} we obtain then an additive invariant Cat∞ex→ℳaddκ\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} and hence by the universal property of 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} a colimit preserving functor Φ:ℳadd→ℳaddκ\Phi\colon{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} and a natural transformation η:Φ∘𝒰add⇒𝒰addκ\eta\colon\Phi\circ{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}\Rightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}. We now observe that the two functors

Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addκℳaddκ⟶γℳaddω\displaystyle\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} Cat∞ex⟶𝒰addℳadd⟶Φℳaddκ⟶γℳaddω\displaystyle\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\Phi}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\gamma}}{{\longrightarrow}}{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}

agree. Since they preserve κ\kappa-filtered colimits and every object in Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex} can be expressed as a κ\kappa-filtered colimit of κ\kappa-small objects, it suffices to show that they agree for every κ\kappa-compact small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. The stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} can be expressed as a filtered colimit colim𝛼​(𝒜α)→𝒜\underset{\alpha}{\mathrm{colim}}({\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}, with 𝒜α∈(Cat∞ex)ω{\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha}\in(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\omega}, and the evaluation of the natural transformation η\eta at 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} identifies with

colim𝛼​𝒰addκ​(𝒜α)⟶𝒰addκ​(𝒜).\underset{\alpha}{\mathrm{colim}}\,\,{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}}_{\alpha})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}})\,.

Since these map belongs to ℰA{\mathcal{E}}_{A}, they become invertible in ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}, and so we conclude that the above two functors agree. Since the one on the right-hand side preserves filtered colimits we conclude that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} also preserves filtered colimits. This shows that 𝒰addω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with 𝒰add{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}} (and hence that ℳaddω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega} agrees with ℳadd{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}). Now, let ℳlocω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} be the category defined as ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} but with κ\kappa replaced by ω\omega. Clearly, the associated functor 𝒰locω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} is the universal localizing invariant and so in order to conclude the proof of Theorem 8.7 it suffices to show that ℳloc{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}} agrees with ℳlocω{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} and that 𝒰loc{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}} agrees with 𝒰locω{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega}. Starting with ℳaddκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa} we can perform the following two localizations

ℳaddκ⟶ℳlocκ⟶ℳlocω\displaystyle{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\omega} ℳaddκ⟶ℳaddω≃ℳadd⟶ℳloc.\displaystyle{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\omega}\simeq{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}\longrightarrow{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}\,.

Since these localizations are independent of the order in which they are performed, our claim follows and so the proof is finished. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4