Proof. For any infinite cardinal κ > ω \kappa>\omega , there is a natural
inclusion map
Ψ perf ( F R ∞ ) ⟶ ( Ind ( Ψ perf ( R ) ) ) κ \Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}
induced by the fact that any countable wedge of copies of R R is in
( Ind ( Ψ ( R ) perf ) ) κ (\Ind(\Psi(R)_{\perf}))^{\kappa} , and the latter is closed under
retracts and stable under finite colimits. Since the inclusion
Ψ perf ( F R ) → Ψ perf ( F R ∞ ) \Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty}) is compatible
with the (Yoneda) inclusion
Ψ perf ( R ) → ( Ind ( Ψ perf ( R ) ) ) κ \Psi_{\perf}(R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa} , we
have a commutative diagram
Ψ perf ( F R ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ≃ \scriptstyle{\simeq} Ψ perf ( F R ∞ ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} Ψ perf ( R ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ( Ind ( Ψ perf ( R ) ) ) κ . \textstyle{(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}.}
Combining this with Ψ perf ( F ~ R ) → Ψ perf ( F ~ R ∞ ) \Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}^{\infty}_{R}) we obtain the commutative diagram
(9.52)
Ψ perf ( F ~ R ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ≃ \scriptstyle{\simeq} Ψ perf ( F ~ R ∞ ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} Ψ perf ( F R ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ≃ \scriptstyle{\simeq} Ψ perf ( F R ∞ ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} Ψ perf ( R ) \textstyle{\Psi_{\perf}(R)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ( Ind ( Ψ perf ( R ) ) ) κ . \textstyle{(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}.}
and hence an induced composite map of quotients
α : Ψ perf ( F ~ R ∞ ) / Ψ perf ( F R ) ⟶ Ψ perf ( F R ∞ ) / Ψ perf ( F R ) \displaystyle\alpha\colon\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})/\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R}^{\infty})/\Psi_{\perf}(F_{R})
⟶ ( Ind ( Ψ perf ( R ) ) ) κ / Ψ perf ( R ) . \displaystyle\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}/\Psi_{\perf}(R).
By the work above, α \alpha can be described as a map
Ψ tri ( μ ^ R ) ⟶ ( Ind ( Ψ perf ( R ) ) ) κ / Ψ perf ( R ) . \Psi_{\tri}(\hat{\mu}R)\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\Ind(\Psi_{\perf}(R)))^{\kappa}/\Psi_{\perf}(R).
Finally, since F R ∞ F_{R}^{\infty} has countable coproducts, the usual
Eilenberg swindle implies that K ( F R ∞ ) K(F_{R}^{\infty}) is contractible.
We also know that K ( Ψ perf ( F ~ R ∞ ) CLOSE K(\Psi_{\perf}(\tilde{F}_{R}^{\infty})
is contractible [33 , 6.1,6.3] . Therefore, applying
Map ( 𝒰 wloc κ ¯ ( 𝒮 ∞ ω ) , 𝒰 wloc κ ¯ ( − ) ) \mathrm{Map}(\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega}),\,\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}(-)) to the
commutative diagram, the fact that all of the horizontal sequences are
strict-exact allows us to apply
theorem 9.10 to conclude that α \alpha induces an
equivalence on K K -theory spectra.
∎