ScalingStacks

0NK0

Proof. Since the Yoneda embedding is fully faithful, it suffices to look at the essential image of the composite. The image of Funexโ€‹(๐’œ,โ„ฌ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) in Funexโ€‹(๐’œโ€‹โŠ—^โ€‹โ„ฌop,๐’ฎโˆž)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}}\widehat{\otimes}{\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) under ฮฝa\nu_{a} is identified with the image of Funexโ€‹(๐’œ,โ„ฌ)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}) in Funexโ€‹(๐’œ,Funexโ€‹(โ„ฌop,๐’ฎโˆž))\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{A}},\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty})) under the corresponding map ๐’ฎโˆžฯ‰โ†’๐’œ{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}^{\omega}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{A}}. Since this lies inside the image of BB inside Funexโ€‹(โ„ฌop,๐’ฎโˆž)\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}}^{\op},{\mathcal{S}}_{\infty}) under the Yoneda embedding, the result follows. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4