ScalingStacks

0NQ0

Proposition 9.32. Let π’ž{\mathcal{C}} be a DHKS-saturated Waldhausen category with factorization. Then the natural map N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]β†’N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1]\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}]\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\\ N({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}] induces a natural equivalence

K⁑(π’ž)⟢K⁑(N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1]).K({\mathcal{C}})\longrightarrow K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}]).
0NQ1

Proof. The additivity theorem implies that, for Waldhausen categories with factorization, the suspension endomorphism Ξ£:π’žβ†’π’ž\Sigma:{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}} induces βˆ’id:K(π’ž)β†’K(π’ž)-\id:K({\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}K({\mathcal{C}}). By naturality, we conclude that OPENΞ£:N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1])β†’N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]\Sigma:\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}])\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}] acts invertibly on KK-theory. Finally, since KK-theory (viewed as a functor of small ∞\infty-categories with finite colimits and a zero object and right-exact functors) preserves filtered colimits, we see that

K⁑(N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1]​[Ξ£βˆ’1])≃colim⁑K⁑(N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1])≃K⁑(N⁑(π’ž)​[Wβˆ’1])≃K⁑(π’ž),K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}][\Sigma^{-1}])\simeq\colim K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}])\simeq K(\mathrm{N}({\mathcal{C}})[W^{-1}])\simeq K({\mathcal{C}}),

where the last equivalence follows from Corollary 7.12. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4