ScalingStacks

0NPY

Proposition 9.31. Let π’ž\mathcal{C} be a presentable ∞\infty-category with a zero object, and let π’žΟ‰β€‹[Ξ£βˆ’1]\mathcal{C}^{\omega}[\Sigma^{-1}] denote the colimit

π’žΟ‰[Ξ£βˆ’1]≃colim{π’žΟ‰βŸΆΞ£π’žΟ‰βŸΆΞ£β‹―}\mathcal{C}^{\omega}[\Sigma^{-1}]\simeq\colim\{\mathcal{C}^{\omega}\overset{\Sigma}{\longrightarrow}\mathcal{C}^{\omega}\overset{\Sigma}{\longrightarrow}\cdots\}

in Cat∞Rex\Cat_{\infty}^{\mathrm{Rex}}. Then π’žΟ‰\mathcal{C}^{\omega} is stable, and the induced functor

π’žΟ‰β€‹[Ξ£βˆ’1]⟢Stab⁑(π’ž)\mathcal{C}^{\omega}[\Sigma^{-1}]\longrightarrow\Stab(\mathcal{C})

identifies the idempotent-completion of π’žΟ‰β€‹[Ξ£βˆ’1]\mathcal{C}^{\omega}[\Sigma^{-1}] with Stab⁑(π’ž)Ο‰\Stab(\mathcal{C})^{\omega}.

0NPZ

Proof. Let π’Ÿ{\mathcal{D}} be an idempotent-complete stable ∞\infty-category. Then

Funex​(π’žΟ‰β€‹[Ξ£βˆ’1],π’Ÿ)\displaystyle\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\omega}[\Sigma^{-1}],{\mathcal{D}}) ≃limFunex​(π’žΟ‰,π’Ÿ)≃limFunΟ‰L​(π’ž,Ind⁑(π’Ÿ))\displaystyle\simeq\lim\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(\mathcal{C}^{\omega},{\mathcal{D}})\simeq\lim\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\omega}(\mathcal{C},\Ind({\mathcal{D}}))
≃FunΟ‰L​(Stab⁑(π’ž),Ind⁑(π’Ÿ))≃Funex​(Stab⁑(π’ž)Ο‰,π’Ÿ).\displaystyle\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}_{\omega}(\Stab(\mathcal{C}),\Ind({\mathcal{D}}))\simeq\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{\ex}}(\Stab(\mathcal{C})^{\omega},{\mathcal{D}}).

Since Stab⁑(π’ž)Ο‰\Stab(\mathcal{C})^{\omega} is necessarily idempotent-complete, we conclude that it is equivalent to the idempotent-completion of π’žΟ‰β€‹[Ξ£βˆ’1]\mathcal{C}^{\omega}[\Sigma^{-1}]. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4