ScalingStacks

0NPS

Proposition 9.25. The two functors

Loc,γ∗:ℳlocκ⟶ℳwlocκ¯\mathrm{Loc},\gamma^{\ast}\colon{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}\longrightarrow\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}

are canonically equivalent, where γ∗\gamma^{\ast} is the right adjoint of the localization functor.

0NPT

Proof. Let us denote by 𝐋{\bf L} the endofunctor Loc∘γ\mathrm{Loc}\circ\gamma of ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}. Note that we have a natural transformation Id⇒𝐋\Id\Rightarrow{\bf L}. Making use of the definition of V⁡(−)V(-) and of the fact that colimits in ∞\infty-categories commute, we observe that 𝐋{\bf L} is a localization functor on ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} [52, 5.2.7.4]. Therefore, it suffices to show that a map in ℳwlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}} becomes an equivalence in ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa} if and only if it becomes an equivalence after application of 𝐋{\bf L}. This follows from the fact that for every small stable ∞\infty-category 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}, we have an equivalence γ⁡(V⁡(𝒜))≃𝒰locκ​(𝒜)\gamma(V({\mathcal{A}}))\simeq{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{A}}): note that we have cofiber sequences in ℳlocκ{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}

𝒰locκ​(Σκ(n)​(𝒜))⟶𝒰locκ​(ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜))⟶𝒰locκ​(Σκ(n+1)​(𝒜)).{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}(\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}))\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}({\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}))\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\kappa}(\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n+1)}({\mathcal{A}}))\,.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4