ScalingStacks

0NPH

Lemma 9.15. Let 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} be a small stable ∞\infty-category. Then Σκ(n)​(𝒜)/Σκ(n)​(𝒜)\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}})/\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}) and ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜){\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}) become trivial after application of 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}.

0NPI

Proof. The object Σκ(n)​(𝒜)/Σκ(n)​(𝒜)\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}})/\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}) is already trivial in Cat∞ex\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex}. Since Proposition 2.18 implies that ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜){\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}) admits all κ\kappa-small colimits, for any ℬ{\mathcal{B}} in (Cat∞ex)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa} the small stable ∞\infty-category Fun⁡(ℬ,ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜))\mathrm{Fun}({\mathcal{B}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}})) also admits all κ\kappa-small colimits. Thus, the connective KK-theory spectrum K⁡(Fun⁡(ℬ,ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜))CLOSEK(\mathrm{Fun}({\mathcal{B}},{\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}})) is trivial. Finally, theorem 9.9 and the fact that the objects 𝒰addκ¯​(ℬ)\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}({\mathcal{B}}), with ℬ{\mathcal{B}} in (Cat∞ex)κ(\Cat_{\infty}^{\ex})^{\kappa} generate the category ℳaddκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}} [52, 5.5.7.3] allow us to conclude that ℱκ​Σκ(n)​(𝒜){\mathcal{F}}_{\kappa}\Sigma_{\kappa}^{(n)}({\mathcal{A}}) becomes trivial after application of 𝒰addκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\kappa}}, and thus after application of 𝒰wlocκ¯\underline{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{wloc}}^{\kappa}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4