ScalingStacks

0NNS

Proof. The argument is exactly the same in both cases. Therefore, we discuss only the stable Kπ’œK_{{\mathcal{A}}}. Since ℬ{\mathcal{B}}, π’ž{\mathcal{C}} and π’Ÿ{\mathcal{D}} belong to (Cat∞perf)Ο‰(\Cat_{\infty}^{\perf})^{\omega}, the spectral Yoneda lemma shows us that we need to prove that the induced sequence of spectra

K⁑(Funex​(π’Ÿ,Idem⁑(π’œ)))\textstyle{K(\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{D}},\Idem({\mathcal{A}})))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}K⁑(Funex​(π’ž,Idem⁑(π’œ)))\textstyle{K(\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{C}},\Idem({\mathcal{A}})))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}K⁑(Funex​(ℬ,Idem⁑(π’œ)))\textstyle{K(\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}({\mathcal{B}},\Idem({\mathcal{A}})))}

is a cofiber sequence. Using corollaryΒ 4.27 it suffices to consider the split-exact sequence of small spectral categories

rep⁑(π’Ÿ,π’œ)\textstyle{\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{D}},{\mathcal{A}})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}rep⁑(π’ž,π’œ)\textstyle{\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}rep⁑(ℬ,π’œ).\textstyle{\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{B}},{\mathcal{A}})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\,.}

Note that, again by corollaryΒ 4.27, all of these spectral categories carry a natural Waldhausen structure inherited from the usual model structure on spectral modules. We will apply Waldhausen’s fibration theorem [84, 1.6.4]. We have the Waldhausen category v​rep​(π’ž,π’œ)v\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}}), whose weak equivalences are the morphisms ff such that Cone⁑(f)\Cone(f) is contractible, as well as the Waldhausen category w​rep​(π’ž,π’œ)w\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}}), with the same cofibrations as v​rep​(π’ž,π’œ)v\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}}) but whose weak equivalences are those ff such that Cone⁑(f)\Cone(f) belongs to rep⁑(π’Ÿ,π’œ)\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{D}},{\mathcal{A}}). Moreover, we have a natural inclusion v​rep​(π’ž,π’œ)βŠ‚w​rep​(π’ž,π’œ)v\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}})\subset w\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}}) and an equivalence rep​(π’ž,π’œ)w≃rep⁑(π’ž,π’œ)\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}})^{w}\simeq\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}}); seeΒ [84, § 1.6]. The conditions ofΒ [84, 1.6.4] are satisfied, so we obtain a cofiber sequence of spectra

K⁑(rep⁑(π’Ÿ,π’œ))⟢K⁑(rep⁑(π’ž,π’œ))⟢K⁑(rep⁑(ℬ,π’œ)).K(\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{D}},{\mathcal{A}}))\longrightarrow K(\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{A}}))\longrightarrow K(\mathrm{rep}({\mathcal{B}},{\mathcal{A}})).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4