ScalingStacks

0NNQ

Proof. We begin by handling the unstable case. Theorem 4.23 implies that we can model 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} by a small spectral category (which we still denote by 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}). Following [56, 3.3], we consider the following sequence of simplicial spectral categories

𝒜∙⟶IP​S∙​𝒜⟶QS∙​𝒜,{\mathcal{A}}_{\bullet}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle I}}{{\longrightarrow}}PS_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle Q}}{{\longrightarrow}}S_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}}\,,

where 𝒜∙{\mathcal{A}}_{\bullet} is a constant simplicial object and P​S∙​𝒜PS_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}} is the simplicial path object of S∙​𝒜S_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}}. By applying the functor 𝒰addun{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} to this sequence, we obtain an induced morphism

Θ:𝒰addun​(P​S∙∞​𝒜)/𝒰addun​(𝒜∙)⟶𝒰addun​(S∙∞​𝒜)\Theta\colon{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(PS^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})/{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}}_{\bullet})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})

of simplicial objects in ℳaddun{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}. We now show that each component Θn\Theta_{n} of Θ\Theta is an equivalence. For each n≥0n\geq 0, we have a split-exact sequence

𝒜\textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}In\scriptstyle{I_{n}}P​Sn​𝒜=Sn+1​𝒜\textstyle{PS_{n}{\mathcal{A}}=S_{n+1}{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Rn\scriptstyle{R_{n}}Qn\scriptstyle{Q_{n}}Sn​𝒜,\textstyle{S_{n}{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\,,}Sn\scriptstyle{S_{n}}

in which

In\displaystyle I_{n} (A)=(∗⟶A⟶IdA⟶Id⋯⟶IdA),\displaystyle(A)=(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{Id}}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}A\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{Id}}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}\cdots\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{Id}}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}A),
Qn\displaystyle Q_{n} (∗⟶A0⟶A1⟶⋯⟶An)=(A1/A0⟶⋯⟶An/A0),\displaystyle(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{1}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n})=(A_{1}/A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n}/A_{0}),
Sn\displaystyle S_{n} (∗⟶A0⟶A1⟶⋯⟶An−1)=(∗⟶∗⟶A0⟶⋯⟶An−1),\displaystyle(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{1}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n-1})=(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n-1}),
Rn\displaystyle R_{n} (∗⟶A0⟶A1⟶⋯⟶An−1)=A0.\displaystyle(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{1}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\longrightarrow A_{n-1})=A_{0}.

By the construction of ℳaddun{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} (and of 𝒰addun{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}), we conclude that the induced morphisms

Θn:𝒰addun​(P​Sn∞​𝒜)/𝒰addun​(𝒜)⟶𝒰addun​(Sn∞​𝒜)n≥0,\Theta_{n}\colon{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(PS^{\infty}_{n}{\mathcal{A}})/{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{n}{\mathcal{A}})\qquad n\geq 0\,,

are equivalences in ℳaddun{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}. This allow us to obtain the following cocartesian square

𝒰addun​(𝒜)≃|𝒰addun​(𝒜)|\textstyle{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}})\simeq|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}})|\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}|𝒰addun(PS∙∞𝒜)|≃∗\textstyle{|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(PS^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})|\simeq\ast\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∗\textstyle{\ast\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}|𝒰addun​(S∙∞​𝒜)|\textstyle{|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})|}

and so a natural equivalence

Σ⁡(𝒰addun​(𝒜))⟶∼|𝒰addun​(S∙∞​𝒜)|\Sigma({\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}}))\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})|

in ℳaddun{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}. By combining this equivalence with the equivalences

(7.18) 𝒰addun​(S∙∞​𝒜)\displaystyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}}) =\displaystyle= |(Funex​(−,Idem⁡(S∙∞​𝒜)))i​s​o|\displaystyle|(\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(-,\Idem(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})))_{iso}|
≃\displaystyle\simeq |(S∙∞​Funex​(−,Idem⁡(𝒜)))i​s​o|\displaystyle|(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(-,\Idem({\mathcal{A}})))_{iso}|
=\displaystyle= Kw​(𝒜),\displaystyle K^{w}({\mathcal{A}})\,,

where (7.18) follows from lemma 7.16, we conclude that Σ⁡(𝒰addun​(𝒜))≃K𝒜w\Sigma({\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}}))\simeq K^{w}_{\mathcal{A}} in ℳaddun{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}. The identification in the stable setting follows from the unstable considerations and the usual passage from results on the KK-theory space to the KK-theory spectrum. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4