Proof. We begin by handling the unstable case. Theorem 4.23
implies that we can model 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} by a small spectral category (which we
still denote by 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} ).
Following [56 , 3.3] , we consider the following
sequence of simplicial spectral categories
𝒜 ∙ ⟶ I P S ∙ 𝒜 ⟶ Q S ∙ 𝒜 , {\mathcal{A}}_{\bullet}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle I}}{{\longrightarrow}}PS_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle Q}}{{\longrightarrow}}S_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}}\,,
where 𝒜 ∙ {\mathcal{A}}_{\bullet} is a constant simplicial object and P S ∙ 𝒜 PS_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}} is
the simplicial path object of S ∙ 𝒜 S_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}} . By applying the functor
𝒰 add un {\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} to this sequence, we obtain an induced morphism
Θ : 𝒰 add un ( P S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) / 𝒰 add un ( 𝒜 ∙ ) ⟶ 𝒰 add un ( S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) \Theta\colon{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(PS^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})/{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}}_{\bullet})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})
of simplicial objects in ℳ add un {\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} . We now show that each component Θ n \Theta_{n} of Θ \Theta is an equivalence. For each n ≥ 0 n\geq 0 , we have a split-exact sequence
𝒜 \textstyle{{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} I n \scriptstyle{I_{n}} P S n 𝒜 = S n + 1 𝒜 \textstyle{PS_{n}{\mathcal{A}}=S_{n+1}{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} R n \scriptstyle{R_{n}} Q n \scriptstyle{Q_{n}} S n 𝒜 , \textstyle{S_{n}{\mathcal{A}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\,,} S n \scriptstyle{S_{n}}
in which
I n \displaystyle I_{n}
( A ) = ( ∗ ⟶ A ⟶ Id A ⟶ Id ⋯ ⟶ Id A ) , \displaystyle(A)=(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{Id}}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}A\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{Id}}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}\cdots\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\mathrm{Id}}}{{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}}A),
Q n \displaystyle Q_{n}
( ∗ ⟶ A 0 ⟶ A 1 ⟶ ⋯ ⟶ A n ) = ( A 1 / A 0 ⟶ ⋯ ⟶ A n / A 0 ) , \displaystyle(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{1}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n})=(A_{1}/A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n}/A_{0}),
S n \displaystyle S_{n}
( ∗ ⟶ A 0 ⟶ A 1 ⟶ ⋯ ⟶ A n − 1 ) = ( ∗ ⟶ ∗ ⟶ A 0 ⟶ ⋯ ⟶ A n − 1 ) , \displaystyle(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{1}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n-1})=(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{n-1}),
R n \displaystyle R_{n}
( ∗ ⟶ A 0 ⟶ A 1 ⟶ ⋯ ⟶ A n − 1 ) = A 0 . \displaystyle(\ast\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{0}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}A_{1}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\cdots\longrightarrow A_{n-1})=A_{0}.
By the construction of ℳ add un {\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} (and of 𝒰 add un {\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} ), we conclude
that the induced morphisms
Θ n : 𝒰 add un ( P S n ∞ 𝒜 ) / 𝒰 add un ( 𝒜 ) ⟶ 𝒰 add un ( S n ∞ 𝒜 ) n ≥ 0 , \Theta_{n}\colon{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(PS^{\infty}_{n}{\mathcal{A}})/{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}})\longrightarrow{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{n}{\mathcal{A}})\qquad n\geq 0\,,
are equivalences in ℳ add un {\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} . This allow us to obtain the
following cocartesian square
𝒰 add un ( 𝒜 ) ≃ | 𝒰 add un ( 𝒜 ) | \textstyle{{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}})\simeq|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}})|\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} | 𝒰 add un ( P S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) | ≃ ∗ \textstyle{|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(PS^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})|\simeq\ast\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ∗ \textstyle{\ast\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} | 𝒰 add un ( S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) | \textstyle{|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})|}
and so a natural equivalence
Σ ( 𝒰 add un ( 𝒜 ) ) ⟶ ∼ | 𝒰 add un ( S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) | \Sigma({\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}}))\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}|{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})|
in ℳ add un {\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} . By combining this equivalence with the equivalences
(7.18)
𝒰 add un ( S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) \displaystyle{\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})
= \displaystyle=
| ( Fun ex ( − , Idem ( S ∙ ∞ 𝒜 ) ) ) i s o | \displaystyle|(\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(-,\Idem(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}{\mathcal{A}})))_{iso}|
≃ \displaystyle\simeq
| ( S ∙ ∞ Fun ex ( − , Idem ( 𝒜 ) ) ) i s o | \displaystyle|(S^{\infty}_{\bullet}\mathrm{Fun}^{\ex}(-,\Idem({\mathcal{A}})))_{iso}|
= \displaystyle=
K w ( 𝒜 ) , \displaystyle K^{w}({\mathcal{A}})\,,
where (7.18 ) follows from lemma 7.16 , we conclude
that Σ ( 𝒰 add un ( 𝒜 ) ) ≃ K 𝒜 w \Sigma({\mathcal{U}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}}({\mathcal{A}}))\simeq K^{w}_{\mathcal{A}} in ℳ add un {\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{add}}^{\mathrm{un}} .
The identification in the stable setting follows from the unstable considerations and the usual passage from results on the K K -theory space to the K K -theory spectrum.
∎