ScalingStacks

0NLR

Proof. Without loss of generality we may identify 𝒜{\mathcal{A}} with its essential image in ℬ{\mathcal{B}}, so that an arrow f:X→Yf\colon X\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Y is in TT if and only if any cofiber ZZ of ff lies in 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. By [52, 5.5.4.15] it suffices to show that T⊆S¯T\subseteq\overline{S}, the strongly saturated class of arrows of ℬ{\mathcal{B}} generated by SS (see [52, 5.5.4.5]). To see this, let X​→𝑓​Y​→𝑔​ZX\overset{f}{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}Y\overset{g}{\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}Z be a cofiber sequence in ℬ{\mathcal{B}} such that ZZ is in 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. Then Z=colimα⁡ZαZ=\colim_{\alpha}Z_{\alpha} is a κ\kappa-filtered colimit of objects Zα∈𝒜κ⊂ℬκZ_{\alpha}\in{\mathcal{A}}^{\kappa}\subset{\mathcal{B}}^{\kappa} and Y=colimα⁡YαY=\colim_{\alpha}Y_{\alpha} is a κ\kappa-filtered colimit of objects Yα=Y×ZZαY_{\alpha}=Y\times_{Z}Z_{\alpha}. Now YαY_{\alpha} may not be κ\kappa-compact, so write Yα=colimβ⁡Yα​βY_{\alpha}=\colim_{\beta}Y_{\alpha\beta} for some Yα​β∈ℬκY_{\alpha\beta}\in{\mathcal{B}}^{\kappa} and consider the resulting diagram of cofiber sequences

Xα​β\textstyle{X_{\alpha\beta}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}fα​β\scriptstyle{f_{\alpha\beta}}Yα​β\textstyle{Y_{\alpha\beta}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}gα​β\scriptstyle{g_{\alpha\beta}}Zα​β\textstyle{Z_{\alpha\beta}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Xα\textstyle{X_{\alpha}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}fα\scriptstyle{f_{\alpha}}Yα\textstyle{Y_{\alpha}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}gα\scriptstyle{g_{\alpha}}Zα\textstyle{Z_{\alpha}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}X\textstyle{X\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}Y\textstyle{Y\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}g\scriptstyle{g}Z\textstyle{Z}

in which the lower right and upper left squares are cartesian, which implies that these two squares are also cocartesian and that the maps Xα→XX_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}X and Zα​β→ZαZ_{\alpha\beta}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Z_{\alpha} are equivalences. Hence Zα​β∈𝒜κ⊆ℬκZ_{\alpha\beta}\in{\mathcal{A}}^{\kappa}\subseteq{\mathcal{B}}^{\kappa} and we conclude that gα​βg_{\alpha\beta} and therefore fα​βf_{\alpha\beta} as well are maps in ℬκ{\mathcal{B}}^{\kappa}; in particular, fα​βf_{\alpha\beta} is an arrow in SS. It follows from [52, 5.5.4.5] that the pushout fαf_{\alpha} of fα​βf_{\alpha\beta} along Xα​β→Xα≃XX_{\alpha\beta}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}X_{\alpha}\simeq X is in S¯\overline{S}, and we see from [52, 5.5.4.12] that f≃colimα⁡fα:X≃colimα⁡Xα→colim⁡Yα≃Yf\simeq\colim_{\alpha}f_{\alpha}:X\simeq\colim_{\alpha}X_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\colim Y_{\alpha}\simeq Y is then also in S¯\overline{S}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4