ScalingStacks

0NLP

Proof. Let π’ž{\mathcal{C}} be a presentable stable ∞\infty-category, and note that a colimit-preserving functor β„¬β†’π’ž{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}} sends the arrows in SS to equivalences in π’ž{\mathcal{C}} if and only if its restriction to π’œ{\mathcal{A}} is trivial. We therefore may identify

FunL​(ℬ/π’œ,π’ž)βŠ†FunL​(ℬ,π’ž),\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}({\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{C}})\subseteq\mathrm{Fun}^{\mathrm{L}}({\mathcal{B}},{\mathcal{C}}),

with the full subcategory spanned by those colimit-preserving functors β„¬β†’π’ž{\mathcal{B}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{C}} which send the arrows in SS to equivalences in π’ž{\mathcal{C}}. It follows from lemmaΒ 5.5 that ℬ/π’œβ‰ƒTβˆ’1​ℬ{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}\simeq T^{-1}{\mathcal{B}}, where TT is the strongly saturated class of arrows of ℬ{\mathcal{B}} which become equivalences in ℬ/π’œ{\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}.

We now show that SS is strongly saturated, so that S=TS=T. First, suppose given a cofiber sequence Xβ†’Yβ†’ZX\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Y\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Z in ℬ{\mathcal{B}} such that ZZ lies in the essential image of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}, and let Xβ†’Xβ€²X\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}X^{\prime} be any map. Then the cofiber of Xβ€²β†’Xβ€²β€‹βˆXYX^{\prime}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}X^{\prime}\coprod_{X}Y is equivalence to ZZ, so is also in the essential image of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. Second, given a diagram fΞ±:XΞ±β†’YΞ±f_{\alpha}\colon X_{\alpha}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Y_{\alpha} in Fun⁑(Ξ”1,ℬ)\mathrm{Fun}(\Delta^{1},{\mathcal{B}}) with colimit f:Xβ†’Yf\colon X\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Y, and suppose that the cofibers ZΞ±Z_{\alpha} of each fΞ±f_{\alpha} lies in the essential image of π’œ{\mathcal{A}}. Commuting colimits implies that the cofiber ZZ of ff is computed as the colimit of the ZΞ±Z_{\alpha}, and this lies in the essential image of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} since π’œ{\mathcal{A}} is closed under colimits and the functor π’œβ†’β„¬{\mathcal{A}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}} preserves colimits. Lastly, suppose h=g∘fh=g\circ f is a composite of f:Xβ†’Yf\colon X\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Y followed by g:Yβ†’Zg\colon Y\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Z, and write Y/XY/X, Z/YZ/Y, and Z/XZ/X for the cofibers of ff, gg, and hh, respectively. Then we have a cofiber sequence Y/Xβ†’Z/Xβ†’Z/YY/X\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Z/X\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}Z/Y, so if any two lie in the essential image of π’œ{\mathcal{A}} then so does the third. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4