ScalingStacks

0NJI

Proposition 2.10. Let π’ž{\mathcal{C}} be a small category with a subcategory wβ€‹π’žw{\mathcal{C}} of weak equivalences which satisfies a homotopy calculus of two-sided fractions (in the sense of Dwyer and Kan [29, 6.1]). Then there is a weak equivalence of simplicial sets

N⁑(wβ€‹π’ž)≃(N⁑((LHβ€‹π’ž)fib))iso,\mathrm{N}(w{\mathcal{C}})\simeq(\mathrm{N}((L^{H}{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}}))_{\mathrm{iso}},

where here LHβ€‹π’žL^{H}{\mathcal{C}} denotes the hammock version of the simplicial localization [29] and (LHβ€‹π’ž)fib(L^{H}{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}} is a fibrant replacement of LHβ€‹π’žL^{H}{\mathcal{C}} as a simplicial category.

0NJJ

Proof. There is an β€œinclusion” functor π’žβ†’LHβ€‹π’ž{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}L^{H}{\mathcal{C}}. Restricting to the weak equivalences and passing to nerves via N\mathrm{N}, we obtain a map of simplicial sets

(2.11) N⁑(wβ€‹π’ž)⟢N⁑(LH​wβ€‹π’ž)⟢N⁑((LH​wβ€‹π’ž)fib);\mathrm{N}(w{\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}(L^{H}w{\mathcal{C}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{N}((L^{H}w{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}});

note that the nerve of wβ€‹π’žw{\mathcal{C}} is the same whether we regard it as a category or as a category (trivially) enriched in simplicial sets [52, 1.1.5.8]. Since (N⁑((LH​wβ€‹π’ž)fib))iso(\mathrm{N}((L^{H}w{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}}))_{\mathrm{iso}} is isomorphic to N⁑((LH​wβ€‹π’ž)fib)\mathrm{N}((L^{H}w{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}}), the inclusion LH​wβ€‹π’žβ†’LHβ€‹π’žL^{H}w{\mathcal{C}}\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}L^{H}{\mathcal{C}} induces a natural map N⁑((LH​wβ€‹π’ž)fib)β†’(N⁑((LHβ€‹π’ž)fib))iso\mathrm{N}((L^{H}w{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}})\mathchoice{\longrightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}(\mathrm{N}((L^{H}{\mathcal{C}})^{\mathrm{fib}}))_{\mathrm{iso}}; under the hypothesis that π’ž{\mathcal{C}} satisfies a homotopy calculus of fractions, this map is a weak equivalence [29, 6.4]. Therefore, it suffices to show that the map of equationΒ 2.11 is a weak equivalence. We consider the map on components; for each homotopy equivalence class [x][x], both sides are equivalent to B​haut⁑(x)B\haut(x) and it is straightforward to see that the map induces the equivalence. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew J. Blumberg, David Gepner, Goncalo Tabuada

Original source: arXiv:1001.2282v4