Proposition 9.2. Suppose that for each -local object , the simplicial space is also -local. Then the -local model category structure on is compatible with the cartesian closure.
Proof. The proof proceeds in several stages. Suppose that is an -local object. Then it follows by hypothesis that is -local for all , where denotes the -fold product. Next one observes by elementary computation that is a retract of ; thus it follows that is a retract of and hence is also -local.
Since the -local model category is a simplicial model category, we see that for any we have that is -local (recall that we regard as a constant simplicial space). Since any simplicial space is a homotopy colimit (in the Reedy model category structure) of a diagram of simplicial spaces of the form where is a space, it follows that is a homotopy limit (again in the Reedy model category structure, assuming is Reedy fibrant) of a diagram of simplicial spaces of the form . Since a homotopy limit of -local objects is -local, we see that is -local for arbitrary .
Now, to show that the -local model category is compatible with the enrichment, it suffices to show that for a cofibration and an -local trivial cofibration , the induced map
is an -local equivalence. Equivalently, we must show that for every -local object the square
is a homotopy pull-back of spaces. But this diagram is isomorphic to
and since and are -local, the columns are weak equivalences, whence the square is in fact a homotopy pull-back. ∎
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source · math/9811037v3