ScalingStacks

5. Homotopy theory in a Segal space[0MT9]

In this section we describe how to obtain certain invariants of a Segal space, including its set of objects, the mapping spaces between such objects, homotopy equivalences between such objects, and the homotopy category of the Segal space.

5.1. “Objects” and “mapping spaces”[0MTA]

Fix a Segal space WW. We define the set of objects of a Segal space WW to be the set of 00-simplices of W0W_{0}, and we denote the set of objects by ob⁡W{\operatorname{ob}}W.

Given two objects x,y∈ob⁡Wx,y\in{\operatorname{ob}}W we define the mapping space mapW⁡(x,y)\map_{W}(x,y) between them to be the fiber of the morphism (d1,d0):W1→W0×W0(d_{1},d_{0})\colon W_{1}\rightarrow W_{0}\times W_{0} over the point (x,y)∈W0×W0(x,y)\in W_{0}\times W_{0}. Note that since WW is Reedy fibrant the map (d1,d0)(d_{1},d_{0}) is a fibration, and thus the homotopy type of mapW⁡(x,y)\map_{W}(x,y) depends only on the equivalence classes of xx and yy in π0​W0\pi_{0}W_{0}. We will sometimes write map⁡(x,y)\map(x,y) when WW is clear from the context.

Given a vertex x∈W0x\in W_{0} we have that d0​s0​x=d1​s0​x=xd_{0}s_{0}x=d_{1}s_{0}x=x. Thus for each object x∈ob⁡Wx\in{\operatorname{ob}}W the point s0​x∈W1s_{0}x\in W_{1} defines a point in mapW⁡(x,x)\map_{W}(x,x), called the identity map of xx, and denoted idx\id_{x}.

Given (n+1)(n+1) objects x0,…,xnx_{0},\dots,x_{n} in ob⁡W{\operatorname{ob}}W we write mapW⁡(x0,x1,…,xn)\map_{W}(x_{0},x_{1},\dots,x_{n}) for the fiber of the map (α0,…,αn):Wn→W0n+1(\alpha_{0},\dots,\alpha_{n})\colon W_{n}\rightarrow{W_{0}}^{n+1} over (x0,…,xn)∈W0n+1(x_{0},\dots,x_{n})\in{W_{0}}^{n+1}. The commutative triangle

Maps​𝒮⁡(F⁡(n),W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(n),W)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}φk\scriptstyle{\varphi_{k}}Maps​𝒮⁡(G⁡(n),W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(G(n),W)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}W0n+1\displaystyle{{{W_{0}}^{n+1}}}

induces trivial fibrations

φk:map⁡(x0,x1,…,xn)→∼map⁡(xn−1,xn)×⋯×map⁡(x0,x1)\varphi_{k}\colon\map(x_{0},x_{1},\dots,x_{n})\xrightarrow{\sim}\map(x_{n-1},x_{n})\times\dots\times\map(x_{0},x_{1})

between the fibers of the slanted maps over (x0,…,xn)(x_{0},\dots,x_{n}).

[05U8]

Remark 5.2. As an example, if CC is a category and either W=discnerve⁡CW=\discnerve C or W=N​CW=NC, then ob⁡W≈ob⁡C{\operatorname{ob}}W\approx{\operatorname{ob}}C and mapW⁡(x,y)≈homC⁡(x,y)\map_{W}(x,y)\approx\hom_{C}(x,y).

5.3. “Homotopies” and “compositions” of “maps”[0MTB]

Let WW be a Segal space, and suppose x,y∈ob⁡Wx,y\in{\operatorname{ob}}W. Given points f,g∈map⁡(x,y)f,g\in\map(x,y), we say that ff and gg are homotopic if they lie in the same component of map⁡(x,y)\map(x,y). We write f∼gf\sim g if ff and gg are homotopic.

A Segal space is not a category, so we cannot compose maps in the usual way. Nonetheless, given f∈map⁡(x,y)f\in\map(x,y) and g∈map⁡(y,z)g\in\map(y,z), we define a composition to be a lift of (g,f)∈map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(x,y)(g,f)\in\map(y,z)\times\map(x,y) along φ2\varphi_{2} to a point k∈map⁡(x,y,z)k\in\map(x,y,z). The result of the composition kk is the point d1​(k)∈map⁡(x,z)d_{1}(k)\in\map(x,z). Since φ2\varphi_{2} is a trivial fibration the results of any two compositions of ff and gg are homotopic. Sometimes we write g∘f∈map⁡(x,z)g\circ f\in\map(x,z) to represent the result of some composition of ff and gg.

[05U9]

Proposition 5.4. Given points f∈map⁡(w,x)f\in\map(w,x), g∈map⁡(x,y)g\in\map(x,y), and h∈map⁡(y,x)h\in\map(y,x), we have that (h∘g)∘f∼h∘(g∘f)(h\circ g)\circ f\sim h\circ(g\circ f) and that f∘idw∼f∼idx∘ff\circ\id_{w}\sim f\sim\id_{x}\circ f.

[05UA]

Proof. We prove the proposition by producing particular choices of compositions which give equal (not just homotopic) results.

To construct h∘(g∘f)h\circ(g\circ f) consider the diagram

map⁡(w,x,y,z)\displaystyle{{\map(w,x,y,z)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}d0​d0×d3\scriptstyle{d_{0}d_{0}\times d_{3}}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}map⁡(w,y,z)\displaystyle{{\map(w,y,z)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}φ2\scriptstyle{\varphi_{2}}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}map⁡(w,z)\displaystyle{{\map(w,z)}}map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(w,x,y)\displaystyle{{\map(y,z)\times\map(w,x,y)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}1×φ2\scriptstyle{1\times\varphi_{2}}1×d1\scriptstyle{1\times d_{1}}map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(w,y)\displaystyle{{\map(y,z)\times\map(w,y)}}map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(x,y)×map⁡(w,x)\displaystyle{{\map(y,z)\times\map(x,y)\times\map(w,x)}}

Note that the composite of the vertical maps in the left-hand column is φ3\varphi_{3}. Any choice of k∈map⁡(w,x,y,z)k\in\map(w,x,y,z) such that φ3​(k)=(h,g,f)\varphi_{3}(k)=(h,g,f) determines compositions d3​k∈map⁡(w,x,y)d_{3}k\in\map(w,x,y) and d1​k∈map⁡(w,y,z)d_{1}k\in\map(w,y,z) with results g∘fg\circ f and h∘(g∘f)h\circ(g\circ f) respectively. By considering an analogous diagram we see that such a kk also determines compositions d0​k∈map⁡(x,y,z)d_{0}k\in\map(x,y,z) and d2​k∈map⁡(w,x,z)d_{2}k\in\map(w,x,z) with results h∘gh\circ g and (h∘g)∘f(h\circ g)\circ f respectively, and that for this choice of compositions there is an equality h∘(g∘f)=(h∘g)∘fh\circ(g\circ f)=(h\circ g)\circ f of results, as desired.

To show that f∘idw∼ff\circ\id_{w}\sim f for f∈map⁡(w,x)f\in\map(w,x), let k=s0​(f)∈map⁡(w,w,x)k=s_{0}(f)\in\map(w,w,x). Then φ2​(k)=(f,idw)\varphi_{2}(k)=(f,\id_{w}) and d1​(k)=fd_{1}(k)=f, showing that f∘idw=ff\circ\id_{w}=f. The proof that idz∘f∼f\id_{z}\circ f\sim f is similar. ∎

5.5. Homotopy category and homotopy equivalences[0MTC]

In view of (5.4) we define the homotopy category of a Segal space WW, denoted by Ho⁡W\ho W, to be the category having as objects ob⁡W{\operatorname{ob}}W, and having as maps homHo⁡W⁡(x,y)=π0​mapW⁡(x,y)\hom_{\ho W}(x,y)=\pi_{0}\map_{W}(x,y). For any f∈mapW⁡(x,y)f\in\map_{W}(x,y) we can write [f]∈homHo⁡W⁡(x,y)[f]\in\hom_{\ho W}(x,y) for its associated equivalence class.

[05UB]

Remark 5.6. Recall (3.5) in which we defined an embedding N:𝒞​at→s​𝒮N\colon{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}at}}\rightarrow s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} via the classifying diagram construction (which by (4.4) in fact lands in the subcategory of Segal spaces). By (5.2) we see that Ho⁡N​C≈C\ho NC\approx C. It is possible to show that the functor NN admits a left adjoint L:s​𝒮→𝒞​atL\colon s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}\rightarrow{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}at}}, and that L⁡(W)≈Ho⁡WL(W)\approx\ho W whenever WW is a Segal space.

A homotopy equivalence g∈map⁡(x,y)g\in\map(x,y) is a point for which [g][g] admits an inverse on each side in Ho⁡W\ho W. That is, there exist points f,h∈map⁡(y,x)f,h\in\map(y,x) such that g∘f∼idyg\circ f\sim\id_{y} and h∘g∼idxh\circ g\sim\id_{x}. Note that this implies by (5.4) that h∼h∘g∘f∼fh\sim h\circ g\circ f\sim f. Furthermore, for each x∈ob⁡Wx\in{\operatorname{ob}}W the map idx∈map⁡(x,x)\id_{x}\in\map(x,x) is a homotopy equivalence by (5.4).

We give another characterization of homotopy equivalences in a Segal space. Let Z⁡(3)=discnerve⁡(0→2←1→3)⊂F⁡(3)Z(3)=\discnerve(0\rightarrow 2\leftarrow 1\rightarrow 3)\subset F(3) be the discrete nerve of a “zig-zag” category; it follows that there is a fibration W3=Maps​𝒮⁡(F⁡(3),W)→Maps​𝒮⁡(Z⁡(3),W)W_{3}=\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(3),W)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(Z(3),W), and an isomorphism

Maps​𝒮⁡(Z⁡(3),W)≈lim(W1→d1W0←d1W1→d0W0←d0W1)≈W1​×W0​W1​×W0​W1.\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(Z(3),W)\approx\lim(W_{1}\xrightarrow{d_{1}}W_{0}\xleftarrow{d_{1}}W_{1}\xrightarrow{d_{0}}W_{0}\xleftarrow{d_{0}}W_{1})\approx W_{1}\underset{W_{0}}{\times}W_{1}\underset{W_{0}}{\times}W_{1}.

(We can thus write simplices of Maps​𝒮⁡(Z⁡(3),W)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(Z(3),W) as certain ordered triples of simplices of W1W_{1}.) Then a point g∈map⁡(x,y)⊂W1g\in\map(x,y)\subset W_{1} is a homotopy equivalence if and only if the element (idx,g,idy)∈Maps​𝒮⁡(Z⁡(3),W)(\id_{x},g,\id_{y})\in\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(Z(3),W) admits a lift to an element H∈W3H\in W_{3}; note that if g∈map⁡(x,y)g\in\map(x,y) then s0​d1​g=idxs_{0}d_{1}g=\id_{x} and s0​d0​g=idys_{0}d_{0}g=\id_{y}.

5.7. The space of homotopy equivalences[0MTD]

Clearly, any point in map⁡(x,y)\map(x,y) which is homotopic to a homotopy equivalence is itself a homotopy equivalence. More generally, we have the following.

[05UC]

Lemma 5.8. If g∈W1g\in W_{1} is a vertex which can be connected by a path in W1W_{1} to a homotopy equivalence g′∈W1g^{\prime}\in W_{1}, then gg is itself a homotopy equivalence.

[05UD]

Proof. Let G:Δ⁡[1]→W1G\colon\Delta[1]\rightarrow W_{1} denote the path connecting gg and g′g^{\prime}. Then it suffices to note that a dotted arrow exists in

Δ⁡[0]\displaystyle{{\Delta[0]}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}H\scriptstyle{H}W3\displaystyle{{W_{3}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Δ⁡[1]\displaystyle{{\Delta[1]}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(s0​d1​G,G,s0​d0​G)\scriptstyle{(s_{0}d_{1}G,G,s_{0}d_{0}G)}Maps​𝒮⁡(Z⁡(3),W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(Z(3),W)}}

where HH is a lift of (s0​d1​g′,g′,s0​d0​g′)=(i​dx′,g′,i​dy′)(s_{0}d_{1}g^{\prime},g^{\prime},s_{0}d_{0}g^{\prime})=(id_{x^{\prime}},g^{\prime},id_{y^{\prime}}) to W3W_{3}, since the right-hand vertical map is a fibration. ∎

Thus, we define the space of homotopy equivalences of WW to be the subspace W{hoequiv}⊆W1W_{\hoequiv}\subseteq W_{1} consisting of exactly those components whose points are homotopy equivalences. Note that the map s0:W0→W1s_{0}\colon W_{0}\rightarrow W_{1} necessarily factors through W{hoequiv}W_{\hoequiv}, since s0​x=idxs_{0}x=\id_{x} is a homotopy equivalence for any vertex x∈W0x\in W_{0}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source · math/9811037v3