Remark 5.2. As an example, if is a category and either or , then and .
5. Homotopy theory in a Segal space[0MT9]
In this section we describe how to obtain certain invariants of a Segal space, including its set of objects, the mapping spaces between such objects, homotopy equivalences between such objects, and the homotopy category of the Segal space.
5.1. “Objects” and “mapping spaces”[0MTA]
Fix a Segal space . We define the set of objects of a Segal space to be the set of -simplices of , and we denote the set of objects by .
Given two objects we define the mapping space between them to be the fiber of the morphism over the point . Note that since is Reedy fibrant the map is a fibration, and thus the homotopy type of depends only on the equivalence classes of and in . We will sometimes write when is clear from the context.
Given a vertex we have that . Thus for each object the point defines a point in , called the identity map of , and denoted .
Given objects in we write for the fiber of the map over . The commutative triangle
induces trivial fibrations
between the fibers of the slanted maps over .
5.3. “Homotopies” and “compositions” of “maps”[0MTB]
Let be a Segal space, and suppose . Given points , we say that and are homotopic if they lie in the same component of . We write if and are homotopic.
A Segal space is not a category, so we cannot compose maps in the usual way. Nonetheless, given and , we define a composition to be a lift of along to a point . The result of the composition is the point . Since is a trivial fibration the results of any two compositions of and are homotopic. Sometimes we write to represent the result of some composition of and .
Proposition 5.4. Given points , , and , we have that and that .
Proof. We prove the proposition by producing particular choices of compositions which give equal (not just homotopic) results.
To construct consider the diagram
Note that the composite of the vertical maps in the left-hand column is . Any choice of such that determines compositions and with results and respectively. By considering an analogous diagram we see that such a also determines compositions and with results and respectively, and that for this choice of compositions there is an equality of results, as desired.
To show that for , let . Then and , showing that . The proof that is similar. ∎
5.5. Homotopy category and homotopy equivalences[0MTC]
In view of (5.4) we define the homotopy category of a Segal space , denoted by , to be the category having as objects , and having as maps . For any we can write for its associated equivalence class.
Remark 5.6. Recall (3.5) in which we defined an embedding via the classifying diagram construction (which by (4.4) in fact lands in the subcategory of Segal spaces). By (5.2) we see that . It is possible to show that the functor admits a left adjoint , and that whenever is a Segal space.
A homotopy equivalence is a point for which admits an inverse on each side in . That is, there exist points such that and . Note that this implies by (5.4) that . Furthermore, for each the map is a homotopy equivalence by (5.4).
We give another characterization of homotopy equivalences in a Segal space. Let be the discrete nerve of a “zig-zag” category; it follows that there is a fibration , and an isomorphism
(We can thus write simplices of as certain ordered triples of simplices of .) Then a point is a homotopy equivalence if and only if the element admits a lift to an element ; note that if then and .
5.7. The space of homotopy equivalences[0MTD]
Clearly, any point in which is homotopic to a homotopy equivalence is itself a homotopy equivalence. More generally, we have the following.
Lemma 5.8. If is a vertex which can be connected by a path in to a homotopy equivalence , then is itself a homotopy equivalence.
Proof. Let denote the path connecting and . Then it suffices to note that a dotted arrow exists in
where is a lift of to , since the right-hand vertical map is a fibration. ∎
Thus, we define the space of homotopy equivalences of to be the subspace consisting of exactly those components whose points are homotopy equivalences. Note that the map necessarily factors through , since is a homotopy equivalence for any vertex .
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source · math/9811037v3