ScalingStacks

13.7. Categorical equivalences are Dwyer-Kan equivalences[0MTY]

In the remainder of this section, we prove the following result.

[05WC]

Proposition 13.8. If g:U→Vg\colon U\rightarrow V is a categorical equivalence of Segal spaces, then it is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence.

[05WD]

Proof. We first note that since Ho⁡(U×E)=Ho⁡U×Ho⁡E=Ho⁡U×I⁡[1]\ho(U\times E)=\ho U\times\ho E=\ho U\times I[1], we see that categorically homotopic maps of Segal spaces induce naturally isomorphic functors between their homotopy categories, and thus a categorical equivalence induces an equivalence between homotopy categories.

If f,h:V→Uf,h\colon V\rightarrow U are maps together with categorical homotopies H:g​f∼1VH\colon gf\sim 1_{V} and K:h​g∼1UK\colon hg\sim 1_{U}, then (13.9) applied to the diagrams

U\displaystyle{{U}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}g\scriptstyle{g}1\scriptstyle{1}K\scriptstyle{K}V\displaystyle{{V}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}h\scriptstyle{h}U\displaystyle{{U}}U\displaystyle{{U}}UE\displaystyle{{U^{E}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Vi0\scriptstyle{V^{i_{0}}}Vi1\scriptstyle{V^{i_{1}}}  and  V\displaystyle{{V}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}1\scriptstyle{1}H\scriptstyle{H}U\displaystyle{{U}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}g\scriptstyle{g}V\displaystyle{{V}}V\displaystyle{{V}}VE\displaystyle{{V^{E}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Vi0\scriptstyle{V^{i_{0}}}Vi1\scriptstyle{V^{i_{1}}}

will show that g​fgf and h​ghg are Dwyer-Kan equivalences, and hence gg is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence using (7.5). ∎

[05WE]

Lemma 13.9. If WW is a Segal space, the map W→WEW\rightarrow W^{E} and both maps WE→WW^{E}\rightarrow W are Dwyer-Kan equivalences.

[05WF]

Proof. By (7.5) it suffices to show that the map j:W→WEj\colon W\rightarrow W^{E} induced by E→F⁡(0)E\rightarrow F(0) is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence. We have already noted in the first part of the proof of (13.8) that categorically equivalent Segal spaces have equivalent homotopy categories, whence Ho⁡(WE)→Ho⁡W\ho(W^{E})\rightarrow\ho W is an equivalence of categories. Thus it suffices to show that the induced map mapW⁡(x,y)→mapWE⁡(j⁡(x),j⁡(y))\map_{W}(x,y)\rightarrow\map_{W^{E}}(j(x),j(y)) is a weak equivalence for each x,y∈ob⁡Wx,y\in{\operatorname{ob}}W.

We consider the diagram

W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}j∗\scriptstyle{j^{*}}(d1,d0)\scriptstyle{(d_{1},d_{0})}(WE)1\displaystyle{{(W^{E})_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(d1,d0)\scriptstyle{(d_{1},d_{0})}i∗\scriptstyle{i^{*}}(WF⁡(1))1\displaystyle{{(W^{F(1)})_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(d1,d0)\scriptstyle{(d_{1},d_{0})}W0×W0\displaystyle{{W_{0}\times W_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}j∗\scriptstyle{j^{*}}(WE)0×(WE)0\displaystyle{{(W^{E})_{0}\times(W^{E})_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}i∗\scriptstyle{i^{*}}(WF⁡(1))0×(WF⁡(1))0\displaystyle{{(W^{F(1)})_{0}\times(W^{F(1)})_{0}}}

where the horizontal arrows are induced by maps F⁡(1)→𝑖E→𝑗F⁡(0)F(1)\xrightarrow{i}E\xrightarrow{j}F(0); note that j​i=s0ji=s_{0}. We will show that the two horizontal maps marked i∗i^{*} are homotopy monomorphisms (12.2), and that the large rectangle is a homotopy pullback; this will imply that for each pair x,y∈ob⁡Wx,y\in{\operatorname{ob}}W the maps of fibers

mapW⁡(x,y)→j∗mapWE⁡(j​x,j​y)→i∗mapWF⁡(1)⁡(s0​x,s0​y)\map_{W}(x,y)\xrightarrow{j^{*}}\map_{W^{E}}(jx,jy)\xrightarrow{i^{*}}\map_{W^{F(1)}}(s_{0}x,s_{0}y)

are such that i∗​j∗i^{*}j^{*} is a weak equivalence and i∗i^{*} is a homotopy monomorphism, whence j∗j^{*} is a weak equivalence, as desired.

That the map Wi:WE→WF⁡(1)W^{i}\colon W^{E}\rightarrow W^{F(1)} is a homotopy monomorphism of spaces in each simplicial degree (and thus also the i∗i^{*}’s) follows since (WE)n=Maps​𝒮⁡(E,WF⁡(n))(W^{E})_{n}=\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(E,W^{F(n)}), (WF⁡(1))n=Maps​𝒮⁡(F⁡(1),WF⁡(n))=(WF⁡(n))1(W^{F(1)})_{n}=\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(1),W^{F(n)})=(W^{F(n)})_{1}, and since WF⁡(n)W^{F(n)} is a Segal space, using (6.2).

The large rectangle is isomorphic to the square

W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(s0,s1)\scriptstyle{(s_{0},s_{1})}(d1,d0)\scriptstyle{(d_{1},d_{0})}W2×W1W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}\times_{W_{1}}W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(d2​π1,d0​π2)\scriptstyle{(d_{2}\pi_{1},d_{0}\pi_{2})}W0×W0\displaystyle{{W_{0}\times W_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0×s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}\times s_{0}}W1×W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}\times W_{1}}}

(where W2×W1W2W_{2}\times_{W_{1}}W_{2} denotes the limit of the diagram W2→d1W1←d1W2W_{2}\xrightarrow{d_{1}}W_{1}\xleftarrow{d_{1}}W_{2}) which is shown to be a homotopy pull-back by a straightforward computation using (12.4). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source · math/9811037v3