ScalingStacks

14. A completion functor[0MTZ]

In this section we prove (7.7). We do this by constructing functorially for each Segal space WW a map iW:W→W^i_{W}\colon W\rightarrow\widehat{W} called the completion map, such that

  1. (1)

    the completion W^\widehat{W} is a complete Segal space,

  2. (2)

    the completion map iWi_{W} is a weak equivalence in the complete Segal space model category, and

  3. (3)

    the completion map iWi_{W} is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence.

Statement (2) implies that a map f:U→Vf\colon U\rightarrow V between Segal spaces is a weak equivalence in the complete Segal space model category structure if and only if f^\widehat{f} is. Likewise, statement (3) together with (7.5) imply that ff is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence if and only if f^\widehat{f} is. Thus (7.7) will follow from statement (1) together with (7.6), which shows that the Dwyer-Kan equivalences between complete Segal spaces are precisely the Reedy weak equivalences between such, which are precisely the weak equivalences between fibrant objects in the complete Segal space model category structure.

We should note that it is easy to demonstrate statements (1) and (2) alone. In fact, (7.2) implies that there exists for each simplicial space WW a fibrant replacement map i:W→Wfi\colon W\rightarrow W^{f}, in which ii is a weak equivalence in the complete Segal space model category structure, and WfW^{f} is a complete Segal space. However, we need a different construction to prove all three statements.

Suppose WW is a Segal space. Let E⁡(m)=discnerve⁡I⁡[m]E(m)=\discnerve I[m]. For each n≥0n\geq 0 we can define a simplicial space by [m]↦Maps​𝒮⁡(E⁡(m),WF⁡(n))[m]\mapsto\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(E(m),W^{F(n)}). Let

W~n=diag⁡([m]↦Maps​𝒮⁡(E⁡(m),WF⁡(n)))=diag⁡([m]↦(WE⁡(m))n).\widetilde{W}_{n}=\diag\left([m]\mapsto\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(E(m),W^{F(n)})\right)=\diag\left([m]\mapsto(W^{E(m)})_{n}\right).

Then the spaces W~n\widetilde{W}_{n} taken together form a simplicial space W~\widetilde{W}, and there is a natural map W→W~W\rightarrow\widetilde{W}. Since Maps​𝒮⁡(E⁡(m),WF⁡(n))=(WE⁡(m))n\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(E(m),W^{F(n)})=(W^{E(m)})_{n}, we can write W~=diag′⁡([m]↦WE⁡(m))\widetilde{W}=\diag^{\prime}([m]\mapsto W^{E(m)}), where diag′:s⁡(s​𝒮)→s​𝒮\diag^{\prime}\colon s(s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}})\rightarrow s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} denotes the prolongation of the diag\diag functor to simplicial objects in s​𝒮s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}.

Let W~→W^\widetilde{W}\rightarrow\widehat{W} denote the functorial Reedy fibrant replacement of W~\widetilde{W}. The composite map iW:W→W^i_{W}\colon W\rightarrow\widehat{W} is called the completion map of WW, and the functor which sends WW to W^\widehat{W} is called the completion functor.

[05WG]

Remark 14.1. This completion is a generalization of the classifying space construction. In fact, suppose WW is a Segal space such that Ho⁡W\ho W is a groupoid; equivalently, that W1=W{hoequiv}W_{1}=W_{\hoequiv}. Then the arguments below show that W^\widehat{W} is weakly equivalent to a constant simplicial space, which in each degree is the realization diag⁡W\diag W. For instance, if WW is a “Δ\Delta-space” (i.e., W0=∗W_{0}=*) and thus a model for a loop space with underlying space equivalent to W1W_{1}, then W^\widehat{W} is equivalent to the constant object which is B​W1BW_{1}, the classifying space of the “loop space” W1W_{1}, in each degree.

[05WH]

Lemma 14.2. If CC is a category, then discnerve⁡C~\widetilde{\discnerve C} is isomorphic to N​CNC. In particular, N​E≈E~NE\approx\widetilde{E} and E^\widehat{E} are weakly equivalent to the terminal object in s​𝒮s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}.

[05WI]

Proof. The first statement is straightforward from the definitions. Since EE is equivalent to the terminal object in 𝒞​at{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}at}}, and NN takes equivalences to weak equivalences by (3.7), the second statement follows. ∎

[05WJ]

Lemma 14.3. If U→VU\rightarrow V is a categorical equivalence between Segal spaces, then U^→V^\widehat{U}\rightarrow\widehat{V} is a Reedy weak equivalence.

[05WK]

Proof. It is clear from the definition that U×E~≈U~×E~\widetilde{U\times E}\approx\widetilde{U}\times\widetilde{E}, and E~\widetilde{E} is contractible by (14.2). Thus categorically homotopic maps are taken to homotopic maps by the completion operator, and hence completion takes categorical equivalences to homotopy equivalences. ∎

[05WL]

Proof of statement (2). By (13.5) the natural maps W→WE⁡(m)W\rightarrow W^{E(m)} are categorical equivalences, and hence weak equivalences in the complete Segal space model category structure by (13.6). Thus the induced map on homotopy colimits

W=diag′⁡([m]↦W)→diag′⁡([m]↦WE⁡(m))=W~W=\diag^{\prime}([m]\mapsto W)\rightarrow\diag^{\prime}([m]\mapsto W^{E(m)})=\widetilde{W}

is a weak equivalence in the complete Segal space model category structure. ∎

[05WM]

Proof of statements (1) and (3). For each simplicial map δ:[n]→[m]∈𝚫\delta\colon[n]\rightarrow[m]\in\boldsymbol{\Delta} there is a diagram

(WE⁡(m))k\displaystyle{{(W^{E(m)})_{k}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(WE⁡(n))k\displaystyle{{(W^{E(n)})_{k}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(WE⁡(m))0×k\displaystyle{{(W^{E(m)})_{0}^{\times k}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(WE⁡(n))0×k\displaystyle{{(W^{E(n)})_{0}^{\times k}}}

By (13.8) the maps WE⁡(m)→WE⁡(n)W^{E(m)}\rightarrow W^{E(n)} are Dwyer-Kan equivalences, so for each set of objects x0,…,xk∈ob⁡Wx_{0},\dots,x_{k}\in{\operatorname{ob}}W the morphism

mapWE⁡(m)⁡(x0,…,xk)→mapWE⁡(n)⁡(δ​x0,…,δ​xk)\map_{W^{E(m)}}(x_{0},\dots,x_{k})\rightarrow\map_{W^{E(n)}}(\delta x_{0},\dots,\delta x_{k})

between the fibers of the vertical maps in the above diagram is a weak equivalence. Thus, the square is a homotopy pullback, with fibers which are weakly equivalent to the products of mapping spaces.

Thus, the induced map of realizations diag′⁡(WE⁡(−))k→diag′⁡(WE⁡(−))0×k\diag^{\prime}(W^{E(-)})_{k}\rightarrow\diag^{\prime}(W^{E(-)})_{0}^{\times k} has its homotopy fibers weakly equivalent to a kk-fold product of mapping spaces, and thus we have shown that W^\widehat{W} is a Segal space, and that mapW⁡(x,y)→mapW^⁡(i⁡(x),i⁡(y))\map_{W}(x,y)\rightarrow\map_{\widehat{W}}(i(x),i(y)) are weak equivalences for all x,y∈ob⁡Wx,y\in{\operatorname{ob}}W.

By construction the map π0​W0→π0​W^0\pi_{0}W_{0}\rightarrow\pi_{0}\widehat{W}_{0} is surjective; it follows that Ho⁡W→Ho⁡W^\ho W\rightarrow\ho\widehat{W} is surjective on isomorphism classes of objects. Therefore we have shown that W→W^W\rightarrow\widehat{W} is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence, proving statement (3).

It remains to show that W^\widehat{W} is a complete Segal space. Consider the square

(WE⁡(m)){hoequiv}\displaystyle{{(W^{E(m)})_{\hoequiv}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(Wj){hoequiv}\scriptstyle{(W^{j})_{\hoequiv}}(WE⁡(n)){hoequiv}\displaystyle{{(W^{E(n)})_{\hoequiv}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(WE⁡(m))0×(WE⁡(m))0\displaystyle{{(W^{E(m)})_{0}\times(W^{E(m)})_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(Wj)0×(Wj)0\scriptstyle{(W^{j})_{0}\times(W^{j})_{0}}(WE⁡(n))0×(WE⁡(n))0\displaystyle{{(W^{E(n)})_{0}\times(W^{E(n)})_{0}}}

induced by a map j:E⁡(n)→E⁡(m)j\colon E(n)\rightarrow E(m). Since WE⁡(m)→WE⁡(n)W^{E(m)}\rightarrow W^{E(n)} is a categorical equivalence by (13.5) and thus a Dwyer-Kan equivalence by (13.8), we may conclude that the induced map {hoequiv}WE⁡(m)⁡(x,y)→{hoequiv}WE⁡(n)⁡(j⁡(x),j⁡(y))\hoequiv_{W^{E(m)}}(x,y)\rightarrow\hoequiv_{W^{E(n)}}(j(x),j(y)) is a weak equivalence for each pair (x,y)∈(WE⁡(m))0×(WE⁡(m))0(x,y)\in(W^{E(m)})_{0}\times(W^{E(m)})_{0}. Thus the above square is a homotopy pullback, and so the induced map diag′⁡(WE⁡(−)){hoequiv}→diag′⁡(WE⁡(−))0×2\diag^{\prime}(W^{E(-)})_{\hoequiv}\rightarrow\diag^{\prime}(W^{E(-)})_{0}^{\times 2} has its homotopy fibers weakly equivalent to the spaces {hoequiv}W⁡(x,y)\hoequiv_{W}(x,y). That is,

(W^){hoequiv}≈diag⁡([m]↦(WE⁡(m)){hoequiv}).(\widehat{W})_{\hoequiv}\approx\diag([m]\mapsto(W^{E(m)})_{\hoequiv}).

Since (WE⁡(m)){hoequiv}≈(WE⁡(m)×E⁡(1))0(W^{E(m)})_{\hoequiv}\approx(W^{E(m)\times E(1)})_{0} by (6.2), the above really says that there is an equivalence (W^){hoequiv}≈(WE⁡(1)^)0(\widehat{W})_{\hoequiv}\approx(\widehat{W^{E(1)}})_{0}. Now (14.3) shows that since WE⁡(1)W^{E(1)} is categorically equivalent to WW, we have that (W^){hoequiv}≈(WE⁡(1)^)0≈(W^)0(\widehat{W})_{\hoequiv}\approx(\widehat{W^{E(1)}})_{0}\approx(\widehat{W})_{0}; in other words, W^\widehat{W} is a complete Segal space. This proves statement (1), and completes the proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source · math/9811037v3