ScalingStacks

[05VD]

Proposition 9.1. Given a inclusion f:A→B∈s​𝒮f\colon A\rightarrow B\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}, there exists a cofibrantly generated, simplicial model category structure on s​𝒮s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} with the following properties:

  1. (1)

    the cofibrations are exactly the inclusions,

  2. (2)

    the fibrant objects (called ff-local objects) are exactly the Reedy fibrant W∈s​𝒮W\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} such that

    Maps​𝒮⁡(B,W)→Maps​𝒮⁡(A,W)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(B,W)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(A,W)

    is a weak equivalence of spaces,

  3. (3)

    the weak equivalences (called ff-local weak equivalences) are exactly the maps g:X→Yg\colon X\rightarrow Y such that for every ff-local object WW, the induced map

    Maps​𝒮⁡(Y,W)→Maps​𝒮⁡(X,W)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(Y,W)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,W)

    is a weak equivalence, and

  4. (4)

    a Reedy weak equivalence between two objects is an ff-local weak equivalence, and if both objects are ff-local then the converse holds.

[05VE]

Proof. The proposition is just a statement of the theory of localization with respect to a given map ff, applied to the category of simplicial spaces. Although localization is now considered a standard technique, it seems that no treatment at the level of generality which we require has yet appeared in print. Goerss and Jardine [GJ, Ch. 9, Thm. 2.3] give a complete proof for localization of simplicial sets with respect to a map; the generalization to simplicial spaces is relatively straightforward. A complete proof is given by Hirschhorn [Hir].

We give a brief sketch of the proof here. Since the desired classes of cofibrations and ff-local weak equivalences have been characterized, the class of ff-local fibrations must be determined by these choices. To construct the localization model category structure, we must find a cofibration j:A→Bj\colon A\rightarrow B which is also an ff-local weak equivalence with the property that a map is an ff-local fibration if and only if it has the right lifting property with respect to jj. The proof of the model category structure follows using the “small object argument” to prove the factorization axiom. (That such a small object argument works here makes use of the fact that simplicial spaces is a left proper model category.)

It is still necessary to choose a jj. Given an uncountable cardinal γ\gamma, take j=∐αiαj=\coprod_{\alpha}i_{\alpha}, where iα:Aα→Bαi_{\alpha}\colon A_{\alpha}\rightarrow B_{\alpha} ranges over isomorphism classes of maps which are cofibrations, ff-local weak equivalences, and such that BαB_{\alpha} has fewer than γ\gamma simplices in each degree. That a sufficiently large γ\gamma produces a map jj with the desired properties follows from the “Bousfield-Smith cardinality argument”. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source page 21

Original source · math/9811037v3