[05VD]
Proposition 9.1. Given a inclusion , there exists a
cofibrantly generated, simplicial model
category structure on with the following properties:
- (1)
the cofibrations are exactly the inclusions,
- (2)
the fibrant objects (called -local objects) are
exactly the Reedy fibrant such that
|
|
|
is a weak equivalence of spaces,
- (3)
the weak equivalences (called -local weak
equivalences) are exactly the maps such that for every -local object , the induced map
|
|
|
is a weak equivalence, and
- (4)
a Reedy weak equivalence between two objects is an
-local weak equivalence, and if both objects are -local then the
converse holds.
[05VE]
Proof. The proposition is just a statement of the theory of localization with
respect to a given map ,
applied to the category of simplicial spaces. Although localization
is now considered a standard technique, it seems that no treatment at
the level of generality which we require has yet appeared in print.
Goerss and Jardine [GJ, Ch. 9,
Thm. 2.3] give a complete proof for
localization of simplicial sets with respect to a map; the
generalization to simplicial spaces is relatively straightforward.
A complete proof is given by Hirschhorn [Hir].
We give a brief sketch of the proof here. Since the desired classes
of cofibrations and -local weak equivalences have been
characterized, the class of -local fibrations must be determined by
these choices. To construct the localization model category
structure, we must find a cofibration which is also
an -local weak equivalence with the property that a map is an
-local fibration if and only if it has the right lifting property
with respect to . The proof of the model category structure
follows using the “small object argument” to prove the factorization
axiom. (That such a small object argument works here makes use of the
fact that simplicial spaces is a left proper model category.)
It is still necessary to choose a . Given an uncountable cardinal
, take , where ranges over
isomorphism classes of maps which are cofibrations, -local weak
equivalences, and such that has fewer than
simplices in each degree. That a sufficiently large produces
a map with
the desired properties follows from the “Bousfield-Smith cardinality
argument”.
∎