2. Simplicial spaces[0MST]
In this section we establish notation for spaces and simplicial spaces, and describe the Reedy model category structure for simplicial spaces.
2.1. Spaces[0MSU]
By space we always mean โsimplicial setโ unless otherwise indicated; the category of spaces is denoted by . Particular examples of spaces which we shall need are , the standard -simplex, , the boundary of the standard -simplex, and , the boundary of the standard -simplex with the -th face removed. If and are spaces we write for the space of maps from to ; the -simplices of correspond to maps .
We will sometimes speak of a โpointโ in a space, by which is meant a -simplex, or of a โpathโ in a space, by which is meant a -simplex.
2.2. The simplicial indexing category[0MSV]
For let denote the category consisting of objects and a sequence of composable arrows: . Let denote the full subcategory of the category of categories consisting of the objects . We write for the identity map in this category.
As is customary, we let for denote the injective functor which omits the th object, and we let for denote the surjective functor which maps the th and st objects to the same object. Additionally, we introduce the following notation: let for denote the functor defined on on objects by .
2.3. Simplicial spaces[0MSW]
Let denote the category of simplicial spaces. An object in this category is a functor , sending . We write , and for the maps corresponding respectively to the morphisms , , and in .
The category is enriched over spaces. We denote the mapping space by . It is convenient to identify with the full subcategory of consisting of constant simplicial objects (i.e., those such that for all ), whence for a space and simplicial spaces and ,
In particular, the -simplices of correspond precisely to the set of maps of simplicial spaces.
Let denote the simplicial space defined by
where the set is regarded as a discrete space. The โs represent the -th space functor, i.e.,
We write , , and for the maps of simplicial spaces corresponding to the maps , , and in .
The category of simplicial spaces is cartesian closed; for there is an internal hom-object characterized by the natural isomorphism
In particular, , and
Furthermore, if is regarded as a constant simplicial space, then .
Finally, we note the existence of a diagonal functor , defined so that the -simplices of are the -simplices of .
2.4. Reedy model category[0MSX]
In this paper we will consider several distinct closed model category structures on . If the model category structure is not named in a discussion, assume that the Reedy model category structure is intended.
The Reedy model category structure [Ree], [DKS93, 2.4โ6] on has as its weak equivalences maps which are degree-wise weak equivalences. A fibration (resp. trivial fibration) in is a map such that each the induced map
is a fibration (resp. trivial fibration) of simplicial sets, where denotes the largest subobject of which does not contain . It follows that the cofibrations are exactly the inclusions.
With the above definitions, all objects are cofibrant, and the fibrant objects are precisely those for which each map is a fibration of spaces. We note here the fact that discrete simplicial spaces (i.e., simplicial spaces such that each is a discrete space) are Reedy fibrant.
This Reedy model category structure is cofibrantly generated [DHK]; i.e., there exist sets of generating cofibrations and generating trivial cofibrations which have small domains, and trivial fibrations (resp. fibrations) are characterized as having the right lifting property with respect to the generating cofibrations (resp. generating trivial cofibrations). The generating cofibrations are the maps
and the generating trivial cofibrations are the maps
2.5. Compatibility with cartesian closure[0MSY]
Given a model category structure on , we say that it is compatible with the cartesian closure if for any cofibrations and and any fibration , either (and hence both) of the following two equivalent assertions hold:
- (1)
The induced map is a cofibration, and additionally is a weak equivalence if either or is.
- (2)
The induced map is a fibration, and additionally is a weak equivalence if either or is.
(A closed symmetric monoidal category together with a Quillen closed model category structure which satisfies the above properties is sometimes also called a โQuillen ringโ.) Assuming (as will always be the case for us) that a weak equivalence or a fibration in our model category structure induces a weak equivalence or a fibration on the degree spaces, then it follows that such a model category structure makes into a simplicial model category in the sense of [Qui67], since for any simplicial spaces and .
The Reedy model category structure on is compatible with the cartesian closure; to prove (1) in this case, it suffices to recall that cofibrations are exactly inclusions, and that weak equivalences are degree-wise.
2.6. Proper model categories[0MSZ]
A closed model category is said to be proper if
- (1)
the pushout of a weak equivalence along a cofibration is a weak equivalence, and
- (2)
the pullback of a weak equivalence along a fibration is a weak equivalence.
The Reedy model category structure is proper, because cofibrations and fibrations are in particular cofibrations and fibrations in each degree, and is proper.
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source ยท math/9811037v3