ScalingStacks

2. Simplicial spaces[0MST]

In this section we establish notation for spaces and simplicial spaces, and describe the Reedy model category structure for simplicial spaces.

2.1. Spaces[0MSU]

By space we always mean โ€œsimplicial setโ€ unless otherwise indicated; the category of spaces is denoted by ๐’ฎ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}. Particular examples of spaces which we shall need are ฮ”โก[n]\Delta[n], the standard nn-simplex, ฮ”ห™โ€‹[n]\dot{\Delta}[n], the boundary of the standard nn-simplex, and ฮ›kโ€‹[n]\Lambda^{k}[n], the boundary of the standard nn-simplex with the kk-th face removed. If XX and YY are spaces we write Map๐’ฎโก(X,Y)\Map_{{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y) for the space of maps from XX to YY; the nn-simplices of Map๐’ฎโก(X,Y)\Map_{{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y) correspond to maps Xร—ฮ”โก[n]โ†’YX\times\Delta[n]\rightarrow Y.

We will sometimes speak of a โ€œpointโ€ in a space, by which is meant a 00-simplex, or of a โ€œpathโ€ in a space, by which is meant a 11-simplex.

2.2. The simplicial indexing category[0MSV]

For nโ‰ฅ0n\geq 0 let [n][n] denote the category consisting of n+1n+1 objects and a sequence of nn composable arrows: {0โ†’1โ†’โ€ฆโ†’n}\{0\rightarrow 1\rightarrow\dots\rightarrow n\}. Let ๐šซ\boldsymbol{\Delta} denote the full subcategory of the category of categories consisting of the objects [n][n]. We write ฮน:[n]โ†’[n]\iota\colon[n]\rightarrow[n] for the identity map in this category.

As is customary, we let di:[n]โ†’[n+1]d^{i}\colon[n]\rightarrow[n+1] for i=0,โ€ฆ,ni=0,\dots,n denote the injective functor which omits the iith object, and we let si:[n]โ†’[nโˆ’1]s^{i}\colon[n]\rightarrow[n-1] for i=0,โ€ฆ,nโˆ’1i=0,\dots,n-1 denote the surjective functor which maps the iith and (i+1)(i+1)st objects to the same object. Additionally, we introduce the following notation: let ฮฑi:[m]โ†’[n]\alpha^{i}\colon[m]\rightarrow[n] for i=0,โ€ฆ,nโˆ’mi=0,\dots,n-m denote the functor defined on on objects by ฮฑiโ€‹(k)=k+i\alpha^{i}(k)=k+i.

2.3. Simplicial spaces[0MSW]

Let sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} denote the category of simplicial spaces. An object in this category is a functor X:๐šซopโ†’๐’ฎX\colon\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}\rightarrow{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}, sending [n]โ†ฆXn[n]\mapsto X_{n}. We write di:Xnโ†’Xnโˆ’1d_{i}\colon X_{n}\rightarrow X_{n-1}, si:Xnโ†’Xn+1s_{i}\colon X_{n}\rightarrow X_{n+1} and ฮฑi:Xnโ†’Xm\alpha_{i}\colon X_{n}\rightarrow X_{m} for the maps corresponding respectively to the morphisms di:[n+1]โ†’[n]d^{i}\colon[n+1]\rightarrow[n], si:[nโˆ’1]โ†’[n]s^{i}\colon[n-1]\rightarrow[n], and ฮฑi:[m]โ†’[n]\alpha^{i}\colon[m]\rightarrow[n] in ๐šซ\boldsymbol{\Delta}.

The category sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} is enriched over spaces. We denote the mapping space by Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(X,Y)โˆˆ๐’ฎ\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y)\in{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}. It is convenient to identify ๐’ฎ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} with the full subcategory of sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} consisting of constant simplicial objects (i.e., those Kโˆˆsโ€‹๐’ฎK\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} such that Kn=K0K_{n}=K_{0} for all nn), whence for a space KK and simplicial spaces XX and YY,

Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Xร—K,Y)โ‰ˆMap๐’ฎโก(K,Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(X,Y)).\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X\times K,Y)\approx\Map_{{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(K,\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y)).

In particular, the nn-simplices of Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(X,Y)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y) correspond precisely to the set of maps Xร—ฮ”โก[n]โ†’YX\times\Delta[n]\rightarrow Y of simplicial spaces.

Let Fโก(k)โˆˆsโ€‹๐’ฎF(k)\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} denote the simplicial space defined by

[n]โ†ฆ๐šซโก([n],[k]),[n]\mapsto\boldsymbol{\Delta}([n],[k]),

where the set ๐šซโก([n],[k])\boldsymbol{\Delta}([n],[k]) is regarded as a discrete space. The Fโก(k)F(k)โ€™s represent the kk-th space functor, i.e.,

Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Fโก(k),X)โ‰ˆXk.\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(k),X)\approx X_{k}.

We write di:Fโก(n)โ†’Fโก(n+1)d^{i}\colon F(n)\rightarrow F(n+1), si:Fโก(n)โ†’Fโก(nโˆ’1)s^{i}\colon F(n)\rightarrow F(n-1), and ฮฑi:Fโก(m)โ†’Fโก(n)\alpha^{i}\colon F(m)\rightarrow F(n) for the maps of simplicial spaces corresponding to the maps did^{i}, sis^{i}, and ฮฑi\alpha^{i} in ๐šซ\boldsymbol{\Delta}.

The category of simplicial spaces is cartesian closed; for X,Yโˆˆsโ€‹๐’ฎX,Y\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} there is an internal hom-object YXโˆˆsโ€‹๐’ฎY^{X}\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} characterized by the natural isomorphism

sโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Xร—Y,Z)โ‰ˆsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(X,ZY).s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}(X\times Y,Z)\approx s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}(X,Z^{Y}).

In particular, (YX)0โ‰ˆMapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(X,Y)(Y^{X})_{0}\approx\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y), and

(YX)kโ‰ˆMapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Xร—Fโก(k),Y).(Y^{X})_{k}\approx\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X\times F(k),Y).

Furthermore, if Kโˆˆ๐’ฎK\in{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} is regarded as a constant simplicial space, then (XK)nโ‰ˆMapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(K,Xn)(X^{K})_{n}\approx\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(K,X_{n}).

Finally, we note the existence of a diagonal functor diag:sโ€‹๐’ฎโ†’๐’ฎ\diag\colon s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}\rightarrow{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}, defined so that the nn-simplices of diagโกX\diag X are the nn-simplices of XnX_{n}.

2.4. Reedy model category[0MSX]

In this paper we will consider several distinct closed model category structures on sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}. If the model category structure is not named in a discussion, assume that the Reedy model category structure is intended.

The Reedy model category structure [Ree], [DKS93, 2.4โ€“6] on sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} has as its weak equivalences maps which are degree-wise weak equivalences. A fibration (resp. trivial fibration) in sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} is a map Xโ†’YX\rightarrow Y such that each kโ‰ฅ0k\geq 0 the induced map

Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Fโก(k),Y)โ†’Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Fโก(k),X)ร—Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Fห™โ€‹(k),X)Mapโก(Fห™โ€‹(k),Y)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(k),Y)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(k),X)\times_{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\dot{F}(k),X)}\Map(\dot{F}(k),Y)

is a fibration (resp. trivial fibration) of simplicial sets, where Fห™โ€‹(k)\dot{F}(k) denotes the largest subobject of Fโก(k)F(k) which does not contain ฮน:[k]โ†’[k]โˆˆ๐šซโก([k],[k])\iota\colon[k]\rightarrow[k]\in\boldsymbol{\Delta}([k],[k]). It follows that the cofibrations are exactly the inclusions.

With the above definitions, all objects are cofibrant, and the fibrant objects are precisely those XX for which each map โ„“k:Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Fโก(k),X)โ†’Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Fห™โ€‹(k),X)\ell_{k}\colon\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(F(k),X)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\dot{F}(k),X) is a fibration of spaces. We note here the fact that discrete simplicial spaces (i.e., simplicial spaces XX such that each XnX_{n} is a discrete space) are Reedy fibrant.

This Reedy model category structure is cofibrantly generated [DHK]; i.e., there exist sets of generating cofibrations and generating trivial cofibrations which have small domains, and trivial fibrations (resp. fibrations) are characterized as having the right lifting property with respect to the generating cofibrations (resp. generating trivial cofibrations). The generating cofibrations are the maps

Fห™(k)ร—ฮ”[โ„“]โˆFห™โ€‹(k)ร—ฮ”ห™โ€‹[โ„“]F(k)ร—ฮ”ห™[โ„“]โ†’F(k)ร—ฮ”[โ„“],k,โ„“โ‰ฅ0,\dot{F}(k)\times\Delta[\ell]\coprod_{\dot{F}(k)\times\dot{\Delta}[\ell]}F(k)\times\dot{\Delta}[\ell]\rightarrow F(k)\times\Delta[\ell],\quad k,\ell\geq 0,

and the generating trivial cofibrations are the maps

Fห™(k)ร—ฮ”[โ„“]โˆFห™โ€‹(k)ร—ฮ›tโ€‹[โ„“]F(k)ร—ฮ›t[โ„“]โ†’F(k)ร—ฮ”[โ„“],kโ‰ฅ0,โ„“โ‰ฅtโ‰ฅ0.\dot{F}(k)\times\Delta[\ell]\coprod_{\dot{F}(k)\times\Lambda^{t}[\ell]}F(k)\times\Lambda^{t}[\ell]\rightarrow F(k)\times\Delta[\ell],\quad k\geq 0,\ell\geq t\geq 0.

2.5. Compatibility with cartesian closure[0MSY]

Given a model category structure on sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}, we say that it is compatible with the cartesian closure if for any cofibrations i:Aโ†’Bi\colon A\rightarrow B and j:Cโ†’Dj\colon C\rightarrow D and any fibration k:Xโ†’Yk\colon X\rightarrow Y, either (and hence both) of the following two equivalent assertions hold:

  1. (1)

    The induced map Aร—DโˆAร—CBร—Cโ†’Bร—DA\times D\amalg_{A\times C}B\times C\rightarrow B\times D is a cofibration, and additionally is a weak equivalence if either ii or jj is.

  2. (2)

    The induced map YBโ†’YAร—XAXBY^{B}\rightarrow Y^{A}\times_{X^{A}}X^{B} is a fibration, and additionally is a weak equivalence if either ii or kk is.

(A closed symmetric monoidal category together with a Quillen closed model category structure which satisfies the above properties is sometimes also called a โ€œQuillen ringโ€.) Assuming (as will always be the case for us) that a weak equivalence or a fibration Xโ†’YX\rightarrow Y in our model category structure induces a weak equivalence or a fibration X0โ†’Y0X_{0}\rightarrow Y_{0} on the degree 00 spaces, then it follows that such a model category structure makes sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} into a simplicial model category in the sense of [Qui67], since Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(X,Y)โ‰ˆ(YX)0\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y)\approx(Y^{X})_{0} for any simplicial spaces XX and YY.

The Reedy model category structure on sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} is compatible with the cartesian closure; to prove (1) in this case, it suffices to recall that cofibrations are exactly inclusions, and that weak equivalences are degree-wise.

2.6. Proper model categories[0MSZ]

A closed model category is said to be proper if

  1. (1)

    the pushout of a weak equivalence along a cofibration is a weak equivalence, and

  2. (2)

    the pullback of a weak equivalence along a fibration is a weak equivalence.

The Reedy model category structure is proper, because cofibrations and fibrations are in particular cofibrations and fibrations in each degree, and ๐’ฎ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} is proper.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source ยท math/9811037v3