ScalingStacks

8. Complete Segal spaces from model categories[0MTH]

In this section we show that complete Segal spaces arise naturally from closed model categories.

Recall from Sectionย 3 that given a category CC and a subcategory WW we can construct a simplicial space Nโก(C,W)N(C,W). If the category C=๐ŒC={\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} is a closed model category with weak equivalences ๐–{\operatorname{\mathbf{W}}}, we will usually write Nโก(๐Œ)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}) for Nโก(๐Œ,๐–)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}},{\operatorname{\mathbf{W}}}), assuming that ๐–{\operatorname{\mathbf{W}}} is clear from the context. (This notation potentially conflicts with that of (3.5), but note (8.5) below.) Let Nfโ€‹(๐Œ)N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}) denote a functorial Reedy fibrant replacement of Nโก(๐Œ)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}).

Given such a pair (C,W)(C,W) we can always construct a complete Segal space by taking the fibrant replacement of Nโก(C,W)N(C,W) in the complete Segal space model category structure. Because this fibrant replacement is a localization functor, it seems to be difficult to compute anything about it. Our purpose in this section is to show that if we start with an appropriate closed model category ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, then we obtain a complete Segal space by taking a Reedy fibrant replacement of Nโก(๐Œ)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}), which is easy to understand since Reedy fibrant replacement does not change the homotopy type of the spaces which make up Nโก(๐Œ)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}).

8.1. Universes[0MTI]

Because the usual examples of closed model categories are not small categories, their classification diagrams are not bisimplicial sets. We may elude this difficulty by positing, after Grothendieck, the existence of a universe UU (a model for set theory) in which ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} is defined. Then Nโก(๐Œ,๐–)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}},{\operatorname{\mathbf{W}}}) is an honest simplicial space (though not modeled in the universe UU, but rather in some higher universe Uโ€ฒU^{\prime}).

Alternately, we note that there is no difficulty if the model category ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} is a small category, and that such exist in practise. As an example, choose an uncountable cardinal ฮณ\gamma, and let ๐’ฎฮณ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}_{\gamma} denote a skeleton of the category of all simplicial sets which have fewer than ฮณ\gamma simplices. Then ๐’ฎฮณ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}_{\gamma} is a small category, and is in fact a simplicial closed model category. (Of course, the category ๐’ฎฮณ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}_{\gamma} is not suitable for all purposes; for example, it is not cartesian closed.)

8.2. The classification space of a closed model category[0MTJ]

If ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} is a simplicial model category, and XX and YY objects in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, we write map๐Œโก(X,Y)\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X,Y) for the function complex from XX to YY.

[05UZ]

Theorem 8.3. Let ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} be simplicial closed model category, and let ๐–โŠ‚๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{W}}}\subset{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} denote the subcategory of weak equivalences. Then V=Nfโ€‹(๐Œ,๐–)V=N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}},{\operatorname{\mathbf{W}}}) is a complete Segal space. Furthermore, there is an equivalence of categories HoโกVโ‰ˆHoโก๐Œ\ho V\approx\ho{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} and there are weak equivalences of spaces mapVโก(X,Y)โ‰ˆmap๐Œโก(X,Y)\map_{V}(X,Y)\approx\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X,Y).

We prove (8.3) below.

[05V0]

Remark 8.4. This result (8.3) presumably generalizes to an arbitrary closed model category, not necessarily simplicial; the function complex mapVโก(X,Y)\map_{V}(X,Y) would be taken to be one of those described by Dwyer and Kan in [DK80].

[05V1]

Remark 8.5. Note that any category CC having finite limits and colimits can be made into a closed model category in which the weak equivalences are precisely the isomorphisms (and all maps are fibrations and cofibrations). In this case Nโก(C)=Nโก(C,isoโกC)N(C)=N(C,\iso C) coincides with the classifying diagram construction described in (3.5), and we have noted (6.1) that this is already a complete Segal space.

8.6. Results about classification spaces[0MTK]

Recall that the classification space classโก๐Œ\class{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} of a model category is defined to be nerveโกweโก(๐Œ)\nerve\we({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}). Given a closed model category ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} and an object Xโˆˆ๐ŒX\in{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, write scโกX\sclass X for the component of classโก(๐Œ)\class({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}) containing XX.

[05V2]

Proposition 8.7 (Dwyer-Kan [DK84a, 2.3, 2.4]). Given a simplicial closed model category ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, and an object Xโˆˆ๐ŒX\in{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} which is both fibrant and cofibrant, let hautโกXโŠ‚map๐Œโก(X,X)\haut X\subset\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X,X) be its simplicial monoid of weak equivalences. Then the classifying complex Wยฏโ€‹hautโกX\bar{W}\haut X is weakly equivalent to scโกX\sclass X; in fact, Wยฏโ€‹hautโกX\bar{W}\haut X and scโกX\sclass X can be connected by a finite string of weak equivalences which is natural with respect to simplicial functors f:๐Œโ†’๐f\colon{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}\rightarrow{\operatorname{\mathbf{N}}} between closed model categories which preserve weak equivalences and are such that fโ€‹Xโˆˆ๐fX\in{\operatorname{\mathbf{N}}} is both fibrant and cofibrant.

[05V3]

Remark 8.8. We can interpret (8.7) as saying that for any two fibrant-and-cofibrant objects X,Yโˆˆ๐ŒX,Y\in{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, the space of paths from XX to YY in classโก(๐Œ)\class({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}) is naturally weakly equivalent to the space {hoequiv}๐Œโก(X,Y)โŠ‚map๐Œโก(X,Y)\hoequiv_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X,Y)\subset\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X,Y) of homotopy equivalences from XX to YY. (The notation classโก(๐Œ)\class({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}) was defined in (1.2).) Compare with (6.4, 4).

Let ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} be a simplicial closed model category. Then ๐Œ[n]{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]} also admits a simplicial closed model category structure, in which a map f:Xโ†’Yf\colon X\rightarrow Y in ๐Œ[n]{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]} is

  1. (1)

    a weak equivalence if fโ€‹i:Xโ€‹iโ†’Yโ€‹ifi\colon Xi\rightarrow Yi is a weak equivalence in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} for each 0โ‰คiโ‰คn0\leq i\leq n,

  2. (2)

    a fibration if fโ€‹i:Xโ€‹iโ†’Yโ€‹ifi\colon Xi\rightarrow Yi is a fibration in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} for each 0โ‰คiโ‰คn0\leq i\leq n, and

  3. (3)

    a cofibration if the induced maps Xโ€‹iโˆXโก(iโˆ’1)Yโก(iโˆ’1)โ†’Yโ€‹iXi\amalg_{X(i-1)}Y(i-1)\rightarrow Yi are cofibrations in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} for each 0โ‰คiโ‰คn0\leq i\leq n, and we let Xโก(โˆ’1)=Yโก(โˆ’1)X(-1)=Y(-1) denote the initial object in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}.

Furthermore, a map ฮด:[m]โ†’[n]\delta\colon[m]\rightarrow[n] induces a functor ฮดโˆ—:๐Œ[n]โ†’๐Œ[m]\delta^{*}\colon{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]}\rightarrow{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[m]} which is simplicial and which preserves fibrations, cofibrations, and weak equivalences.

If YY is a fibrant-and-cofibrant object in ๐Œ[n]{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]}, with restriction Yโ€ฒโˆˆ๐Œ[nโˆ’1]Y^{\prime}\in{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n-1]} formed from the first nn objects and (nโˆ’1)(n-1) maps in [n][n], then the homotopy fiber of the map

Wยฏโ€‹haut๐Œ[n]โ€‹Yโ†’Wยฏโ€‹haut๐Œ[nโˆ’1]โ€‹Yโ€ฒร—Wยฏโ€‹haut๐ŒโกYโก(n)\bar{W}\haut_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]}}Y\rightarrow\bar{W}\haut_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n-1]}}Y^{\prime}\times\bar{W}\haut_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}Y(n)

is weakly equivalent the union of those components of map๐Œโก(Yโก(nโˆ’1),Yโก(n))\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(Y(n-1),Y(n)) containing conjugates of the given map Ynโˆ’1:Yโก(nโˆ’1)โ†’Yโก(n)Y_{n-1}\colon Y(n-1)\rightarrow Y(n); by conjugate we mean maps of the form jโˆ˜Ynโˆ’1โˆ˜ij\circ Y_{n-1}\circ i where ii and jj are self-homotopy equivalences of Yโก(nโˆ’1)Y(n-1) and Yโก(n)Y(n) respectively. Here Wยฏ\bar{W} denotes the classifying complex as in [May67, p. 87]. Applying this fibration iteratively shows that the homotopy fiber of the map

Wยฏโ€‹haut๐Œ[n]โ€‹Yโ†’Wยฏโ€‹haut๐ŒโกYโก(0)ร—โ‹ฏร—Wยฏโ€‹haut๐ŒโกYโก(n)\bar{W}\haut_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]}}Y\rightarrow\bar{W}\haut_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}Y(0)\times\dots\times\bar{W}\haut_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}Y(n)

is naturally weakly equivalent to the union of those components of

map๐Œโก(Yโก(0),Yโก(1))ร—โ‹ฏร—map๐Œโก(Yโก(nโˆ’1),Yโก(n))\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(Y(0),Y(1))\times\dots\times\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(Y(n-1),Y(n))

containing โ€œconjugatesโ€ of the given sequence of maps Yi:Yโก(i)โ†’Yโก(i+1)Y_{i}\colon Y(i)\rightarrow Y(i+1).

[05V4]

Proof of (8.3). Let U=Nโก(๐Œ)U=N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}), so that Un=nerveโกweโก(๐Œ[n])U_{n}=\nerve\we({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[n]}) and Unโ†’VnU_{n}\rightarrow V_{n} is a weak equivalence of spaces. For each nโ‰ฅ0n\geq 0 there is a map ฯ€n:Unโ†’U0n+1\pi_{n}\colon U_{n}\rightarrow U_{0}^{n+1} which โ€œremembersโ€ only objects. The remarks above together with (8.7) show that for each (n+1)(n+1)-tuple of objects (X0,โ€ฆ,Xn)(X_{0},\dots,X_{n}) in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} the homotopy fiber of ฯ€n\pi_{n} over the point corresponding to (X0,โ€ฆ,Xn)(X_{0},\dots,X_{n}) is in a natural way weakly equivalent to a product

map๐Œโก(Xnโˆ’1โ€ฒ,Xnโ€ฒ)ร—โ‹ฏร—map๐Œโก(X0โ€ฒ,X1โ€ฒ),\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X_{n-1}^{\prime},X_{n}^{\prime})\times\dots\times\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X_{0}^{\prime},X_{1}^{\prime}),

where Xiโ€ฒX_{i}^{\prime} is a fibrant-and-cofibrant object of ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} which is weakly equivalent to XiX_{i}.

Note that it is an immediate consequence of the above that VV is a Segal space. Since ฯ€0โ€‹U0\pi_{0}U_{0} is just the set of weak homotopy types in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, and since Hoโก๐Œโก(X,Y)โ‰ˆฯ€0โ€‹map๐Œโก(Xโ€ฒ,Yโ€ฒ)\ho{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}(X,Y)\approx\pi_{0}\map_{{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}}(X^{\prime},Y^{\prime}) where Xโ€ฒX^{\prime} and Yโ€ฒY^{\prime} are fibrant-and-cofibrant replacements of XX and YY respectively, we see that Hoโก๐Œโ‰ˆHoโกV\ho{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}\approx\ho V.

Let U{hoequiv}โŠ‚U1U_{\hoequiv}\subset U_{1} denote the subspace of U1U_{1} which corresponds to the subspace V{hoequiv}โŠ‚V1V_{\hoequiv}\subset V_{1}. By the equivalence of homotopy categories above, we see that U{hoequiv}U_{\hoequiv} consists of precisely the components of U1U_{1} whose points go to isomorphisms in Hoโก๐Œ\ho{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}. Since ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} is a closed model category, this means that the 00-simplices of U{hoequiv}U_{\hoequiv} are precisely the objects of ๐Œ[1]{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[1]} which are weak equivalences, so U{hoequiv}=nerveโกweโก((weโก๐Œ)[1])U_{\hoequiv}=\nerve\we((\we{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}})^{[1]}). There is an adjoint functor pair F:๐Œ[1]โ‡†๐Œ:GF\colon{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{[1]}\leftrightarrows{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}\;{:}\,G in which the right adjoint takes Gโก(X)=idXG(X)=\id_{X}, and the left adjoint takes Fโก(Xโ†’Y)=XF(X\rightarrow Y)=X; this pair restricts to an adjoint pair weโก((weโก๐Œ)[1])โ‡†weโก๐Œ\we((\we{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}})^{[1]})\leftrightarrows\we{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} and thus induces a weak equivalence U{hoequiv}โ‰ˆU0U_{\hoequiv}\approx U_{0} of the nerves. Thus VV is a complete Segal space. โˆŽ

8.9. Categories of diagrams[0MTL]

Let ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} be a closed model category, and let II denote a small indexing category; recall that the weak equivalences in the category ๐ŒI{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{I} of functors are the object-wise weak equivalences. Consider

f:Nโก(๐ŒI)โ‰ˆNโ€‹(๐Œ)discnerveโกIโ†’Nfโ€‹(๐Œ)discnerveโกI,f\colon N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{I})\approx N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}})^{\discnerve I}\rightarrow N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}})^{\discnerve I}, (8.10)

where the isomorphism on the left-hand side is that described in (3.11), and the map on the right-hand side is that induced by the Reedy fibrant replacement of Nโก(๐Œ)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}). If ff can be shown to be a weak equivalence, then this means we can compute the homotopy type of the classification diagram associated to I{I}-diagrams in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} knowing only the homotopy type of the classification diagram of ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} itself. In particular, knowing Nโก(๐Œ)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}) determines the homotopy category Hoโก(๐ŒI)\ho({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{I}) of the category of II-diagrams in ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}} for every small category II.

A result of Dwyer and Kan shows that this holds at least for certain cases of ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}.

[05V5]

Theorem 8.11. The map ff of (8.10) is a Reedy weak equivalence when ๐Œ=๐’ฎ๐‰{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}={\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{{\operatorname{\mathbf{J}}}}, where ๐’ฎ{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} denotes the category of simplicial sets and ๐‰{\operatorname{\mathbf{J}}} is a small indexing category.

Taken together with (3.11) we obtain the following corollary.

[05V6]

Corollary 8.12. There is a natural weak equivalence Nโก(๐ŒI)โ†’โˆผNfโ€‹(๐Œ)Nโก(I)N({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}^{I})\xrightarrow{\sim}N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}})^{N(I)} of complete Segal spaces if ๐Œ=๐’ฎJ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}={\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{J} and II and JJ are small categories.

We prove (8.11) below.

[05V7]

Remark 8.13. It seems that the theorem of Dwyer and Kan, and hence the statements of (8.11) and (8.12) should hold for any โ€œreasonableโ€ model category ๐Œ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}, where the class of โ€œreasonableโ€ closed model categories includes at least the โ€œcofibrantly generatedโ€ simplicial closed model categories. We hope that future work will provide a generalization of these theorems to arbitrary closed model categories.

Let ๐šซopโ€‹I\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}I denote the category of simplices of II. This is a category in which the objects are functors f:[m]โ†’If\colon[m]\rightarrow I, and the morphisms (f:[m]โ†’I)โ†’(g:[n]โ†’I)(f\colon[m]\rightarrow I)\rightarrow(g\colon[n]\rightarrow I) consist of functors ฮด:[n]โ†’[m]\delta\colon[n]\rightarrow[m] making fโˆ˜ฮด=gf\circ\delta=g. The actual theorem of Dwyer and Kan [DK84a], [DK84b] is the following:

[05V8]

Theorem 8.14 (Dwyer-Kan). Let II be a small category. The natural map

class(๐’ฎI)โ‰ˆlimclass([k]โ†’I)โˆˆ๐šซopโ€‹I(๐’ฎ[k])โ†’holim([k]โ†’I)โˆˆ๐šซopโ€‹Iclass(๐’ฎ[k])f\class({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{I})\approx\lim{}_{([k]\rightarrow I)\in\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}I}\class({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{[k]})\rightarrow\holim_{([k]\rightarrow I)\in\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}I}\class({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{[k]})^{f}

is a weak equivalence, where XfX^{f} denotes the fibrant replacement of a space XX, and holim\holim is the homotopy inverse limit construction of [BK72].

[05V9]

Proof. That this map is a weak equivalence from each component of classโก(๐’ฎI)\class({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{I}) to the corresponding component of the homotopy limit follows from [DK84a, 3.4(iii)]. That the map is surjective on path components is a consequence of Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 3.7 of [DK84b]. โˆŽ

To derive (8.11) from (8.14) we use the following lemma.

[05VA]

Lemma 8.15. Let II be a small category and let WW be a Reedy fibrant simplicial space. Then the natural map

Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(discnerveโกI,W)โ‰ˆlimWk([k]โ†’I)โˆˆ๐šซopโ€‹Iโ†’holim([k]โ†’I)โˆˆ๐šซopโ€‹IโกWk\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\discnerve I,W)\approx\lim{}_{([k]\rightarrow I)\in\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}I}W_{k}\rightarrow\holim_{([k]\rightarrow I)\in\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}I}W_{k}

is a weak equivalence.

[05VB]

Proof. Let AA be an object in sโก(sโ€‹๐’ฎ)s(s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}) (i.e., a simplicial object in sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}) defined by

Aโก(m)=โˆ[k0]โ†’โ€ฆโ†’[km]โˆˆIFโก(k0)โˆˆsโ€‹๐’ฎ.A(m)=\coprod_{[k_{0}]\rightarrow\dots\rightarrow[k_{m}]\in I}F(k_{0})\in s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}.

There is an augmentation map Aโก(0)โ†’discnerveโกIA(0)\rightarrow\discnerve I, and the induced map diagโ€ฒโกAโ†’discnerveโกI\diag^{\prime}{A}\rightarrow\discnerve I is a Reedy weak equivalence in sโ€‹๐’ฎs{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}, where diagโ€ฒ:sโก(sโ€‹๐’ฎ)โ†’sโ€‹๐’ฎ\diag^{\prime}\colon s(s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}})\rightarrow s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} denotes the prolongation of the diagonal functor, in this case defined by (diagโ€ฒโกA)nโ‰ˆdiagโก([m]โ†’Aโ€‹(m)n)(\diag^{\prime}A)_{n}\approx\diag\left([m]\rightarrow A(m)_{n}\right). The result follows from isomorphisms

Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(diagโ€ฒโกA,W)โ‰ˆTotโก(Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(Aโก(โˆ’),W))โ‰ˆholim[k]โ†’Iโˆˆ๐šซopโ€‹IโกWk,\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\diag^{\prime}{A},W)\approx\Tot(\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(A({-}),W))\approx\holim_{[k]\rightarrow I\in\boldsymbol{\Delta}^{\operatorname{op}}I}W_{k},

and the fact that Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(discnerveโกI,W)โ†’Mapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(diagโ€ฒโกA,W)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\discnerve I,W)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\diag^{\prime}{A},W) is a weak equivalence since WW is Reedy fibrant. โˆŽ

[05VC]

Proof of (8.11). Using (8.15) we can reinterpret (8.14) as stating that there is a weak equivalence

classโก(๐’ฎI)โ†’โˆผMapsโ€‹๐’ฎโก(discnerveโกI,Nfโ€‹(๐’ฎ)).\class({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{I})\xrightarrow{\sim}\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\discnerve I,N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}})).

Substituting [m]ร—I[m]\times I for II in the above for all mโ‰ฅ0m\geq 0 leads to a Reedy weak equivalence

Nโก(๐’ฎI)โ†’โˆผNfโ€‹(๐’ฎ)discnerveโกI,N({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{I})\xrightarrow{\sim}N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}})^{\discnerve I},

which is the special case of (8.10) with ๐Œ=๐’ฎ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}={\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}. To obtain the case of ๐Œ=๐’ฎJ{\operatorname{\mathbf{M}}}={\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{J}, note that by what we have just shown the maps in

Nโก(๐’ฎIร—J)โ†’โˆผNfโ€‹(๐’ฎ)discnerveโก(Iร—J)โ‰ˆNfโ€‹(๐’ฎ)discnerveโกIร—discnerveโกJโ†โˆผNfโ€‹(๐’ฎJ)discnerveโกIN({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{I\times J})\xrightarrow{\sim}N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}})^{\discnerve(I\times J)}\approx N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}})^{\discnerve I\times\discnerve J}\xleftarrow{\sim}N^{f}({\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}^{J})^{\discnerve I}

must be Reedy weak equivalences. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source ยท math/9811037v3