Theorem 8.3. Let be simplicial closed model category, and let denote the subcategory of weak equivalences. Then is a complete Segal space. Furthermore, there is an equivalence of categories and there are weak equivalences of spaces .
8. Complete Segal spaces from model categories[0MTH]
In this section we show that complete Segal spaces arise naturally from closed model categories.
Recall from Sectionย 3 that given a category and a subcategory we can construct a simplicial space . If the category is a closed model category with weak equivalences , we will usually write for , assuming that is clear from the context. (This notation potentially conflicts with that of (3.5), but note (8.5) below.) Let denote a functorial Reedy fibrant replacement of .
Given such a pair we can always construct a complete Segal space by taking the fibrant replacement of in the complete Segal space model category structure. Because this fibrant replacement is a localization functor, it seems to be difficult to compute anything about it. Our purpose in this section is to show that if we start with an appropriate closed model category , then we obtain a complete Segal space by taking a Reedy fibrant replacement of , which is easy to understand since Reedy fibrant replacement does not change the homotopy type of the spaces which make up .
8.1. Universes[0MTI]
Because the usual examples of closed model categories are not small categories, their classification diagrams are not bisimplicial sets. We may elude this difficulty by positing, after Grothendieck, the existence of a universe (a model for set theory) in which is defined. Then is an honest simplicial space (though not modeled in the universe , but rather in some higher universe ).
Alternately, we note that there is no difficulty if the model category is a small category, and that such exist in practise. As an example, choose an uncountable cardinal , and let denote a skeleton of the category of all simplicial sets which have fewer than simplices. Then is a small category, and is in fact a simplicial closed model category. (Of course, the category is not suitable for all purposes; for example, it is not cartesian closed.)
8.2. The classification space of a closed model category[0MTJ]
If is a simplicial model category, and and objects in , we write for the function complex from to .
We prove (8.3) below.
Remark 8.4. This result (8.3) presumably generalizes to an arbitrary closed model category, not necessarily simplicial; the function complex would be taken to be one of those described by Dwyer and Kan in [DK80].
Remark 8.5. Note that any category having finite limits and colimits can be made into a closed model category in which the weak equivalences are precisely the isomorphisms (and all maps are fibrations and cofibrations). In this case coincides with the classifying diagram construction described in (3.5), and we have noted (6.1) that this is already a complete Segal space.
8.6. Results about classification spaces[0MTK]
Recall that the classification space of a model category is defined to be . Given a closed model category and an object , write for the component of containing .
Proposition 8.7 (Dwyer-Kan [DK84a, 2.3, 2.4]). Given a simplicial closed model category , and an object which is both fibrant and cofibrant, let be its simplicial monoid of weak equivalences. Then the classifying complex is weakly equivalent to ; in fact, and can be connected by a finite string of weak equivalences which is natural with respect to simplicial functors between closed model categories which preserve weak equivalences and are such that is both fibrant and cofibrant.
Remark 8.8. We can interpret (8.7) as saying that for any two fibrant-and-cofibrant objects , the space of paths from to in is naturally weakly equivalent to the space of homotopy equivalences from to . (The notation was defined in (1.2).) Compare with (6.4, 4).
Let be a simplicial closed model category. Then also admits a simplicial closed model category structure, in which a map in is
- (1)
a weak equivalence if is a weak equivalence in for each ,
- (2)
a fibration if is a fibration in for each , and
- (3)
a cofibration if the induced maps are cofibrations in for each , and we let denote the initial object in .
Furthermore, a map induces a functor which is simplicial and which preserves fibrations, cofibrations, and weak equivalences.
If is a fibrant-and-cofibrant object in , with restriction formed from the first objects and maps in , then the homotopy fiber of the map
is weakly equivalent the union of those components of containing conjugates of the given map ; by conjugate we mean maps of the form where and are self-homotopy equivalences of and respectively. Here denotes the classifying complex as in [May67, p. 87]. Applying this fibration iteratively shows that the homotopy fiber of the map
is naturally weakly equivalent to the union of those components of
containing โconjugatesโ of the given sequence of maps .
Proof of (8.3). Let , so that and is a weak equivalence of spaces. For each there is a map which โremembersโ only objects. The remarks above together with (8.7) show that for each -tuple of objects in the homotopy fiber of over the point corresponding to is in a natural way weakly equivalent to a product
where is a fibrant-and-cofibrant object of which is weakly equivalent to .
Note that it is an immediate consequence of the above that is a Segal space. Since is just the set of weak homotopy types in , and since where and are fibrant-and-cofibrant replacements of and respectively, we see that .
Let denote the subspace of which corresponds to the subspace . By the equivalence of homotopy categories above, we see that consists of precisely the components of whose points go to isomorphisms in . Since is a closed model category, this means that the -simplices of are precisely the objects of which are weak equivalences, so . There is an adjoint functor pair in which the right adjoint takes , and the left adjoint takes ; this pair restricts to an adjoint pair and thus induces a weak equivalence of the nerves. Thus is a complete Segal space. โ
8.9. Categories of diagrams[0MTL]
Let be a closed model category, and let denote a small indexing category; recall that the weak equivalences in the category of functors are the object-wise weak equivalences. Consider
| (8.10) |
where the isomorphism on the left-hand side is that described in (3.11), and the map on the right-hand side is that induced by the Reedy fibrant replacement of . If can be shown to be a weak equivalence, then this means we can compute the homotopy type of the classification diagram associated to -diagrams in knowing only the homotopy type of the classification diagram of itself. In particular, knowing determines the homotopy category of the category of -diagrams in for every small category .
A result of Dwyer and Kan shows that this holds at least for certain cases of .
Theorem 8.11. The map of (8.10) is a Reedy weak equivalence when , where denotes the category of simplicial sets and is a small indexing category.
Taken together with (3.11) we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 8.12. There is a natural weak equivalence of complete Segal spaces if and and are small categories.
We prove (8.11) below.
Remark 8.13. It seems that the theorem of Dwyer and Kan, and hence the statements of (8.11) and (8.12) should hold for any โreasonableโ model category , where the class of โreasonableโ closed model categories includes at least the โcofibrantly generatedโ simplicial closed model categories. We hope that future work will provide a generalization of these theorems to arbitrary closed model categories.
Let denote the category of simplices of . This is a category in which the objects are functors , and the morphisms consist of functors making . The actual theorem of Dwyer and Kan [DK84a], [DK84b] is the following:
Theorem 8.14 (Dwyer-Kan). Let be a small category. The natural map
is a weak equivalence, where denotes the fibrant replacement of a space , and is the homotopy inverse limit construction of [BK72].
Lemma 8.15. Let be a small category and let be a Reedy fibrant simplicial space. Then the natural map
is a weak equivalence.
Proof. Let be an object in (i.e., a simplicial object in ) defined by
There is an augmentation map , and the induced map is a Reedy weak equivalence in , where denotes the prolongation of the diagonal functor, in this case defined by . The result follows from isomorphisms
and the fact that is a weak equivalence since is Reedy fibrant. โ
Proof of (8.11). Using (8.15) we can reinterpret (8.14) as stating that there is a weak equivalence
Substituting for in the above for all leads to a Reedy weak equivalence
which is the special case of (8.10) with . To obtain the case of , note that by what we have just shown the maps in
must be Reedy weak equivalences. โ
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source ยท math/9811037v3