ScalingStacks

[05VG]

Proof. The proof proceeds in several stages. Suppose that WW is an ff-local object. Then it follows by hypothesis that W(F⁡(1))kW^{(F(1))^{k}} is ff-local for all kk, where (F⁡(1))k(F(1))^{k} denotes the kk-fold product. Next one observes by elementary computation that F⁡(k)F(k) is a retract of (F⁡(1))k(F(1))^{k}; thus it follows that WF⁡(k)W^{F(k)} is a retract of W(F⁡(1))kW^{(F(1))^{k}} and hence is also ff-local.

Since the ff-local model category is a simplicial model category, we see that for any K∈𝒮K\in{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} we have that (WF⁡(n))K=WF⁡(n)×K(W^{F(n)})^{K}=W^{F(n)\times K} is ff-local (recall that we regard KK as a constant simplicial space). Since any simplicial space XX is a homotopy colimit (in the Reedy model category structure) of a diagram of simplicial spaces of the form F⁡(k)×KF(k)\times K where KK is a space, it follows that WXW^{X} is a homotopy limit (again in the Reedy model category structure, assuming WW is Reedy fibrant) of a diagram of simplicial spaces of the form WF⁡(k)×KW^{F(k)\times K}. Since a homotopy limit of ff-local objects is ff-local, we see that WXW^{X} is ff-local for arbitrary XX.

Now, to show that the ff-local model category is compatible with the enrichment, it suffices to show that for a cofibration i:X→Yi\colon X\rightarrow Y and an ff-local trivial cofibration j:U→Vj\colon U\rightarrow V, the induced map

U×Y∐U×XV×X→V×YU\times Y\coprod_{U\times X}V\times X\rightarrow V\times Y

is an ff-local equivalence. Equivalently, we must show that for every ff-local object WW the square

Maps​𝒮⁡(V×Y,W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(V\times Y,W)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Maps​𝒮⁡(V×X,W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(V\times X,W)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Maps​𝒮⁡(U×Y,W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(U\times Y,W)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Maps​𝒮⁡(U×X,W)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(U\times X,W)}}

is a homotopy pull-back of spaces. But this diagram is isomorphic to

Maps​𝒮⁡(V,WY)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(V,W^{Y})}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Maps​𝒮⁡(V,WX)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(V,W^{X})}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Maps​𝒮⁡(U,WY)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(U,W^{Y})}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Maps​𝒮⁡(U,WX)\displaystyle{{\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(U,W^{X})}}

and since WXW^{X} and WYW^{Y} are ff-local, the columns are weak equivalences, whence the square is in fact a homotopy pull-back. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

    Original source page 22

    Original source · math/9811037v3