Proof.The proof proceeds in several stages. Suppose that is an
-local object. Then it follows by hypothesis that
is -local for all
, where denotes the -fold product. Next one observes
by elementary computation that is a
retract of ; thus it follows that is a retract
of and hence is also -local.
Since the -local model category is a simplicial model category, we
see that for any we have that
is -local (recall that we regard
as a constant simplicial space). Since any simplicial space is
a homotopy colimit (in the Reedy model category structure)
of a diagram of simplicial spaces of the form where
is a space, it
follows that is a homotopy limit (again in the Reedy model
category structure, assuming is Reedy fibrant) of a diagram of
simplicial
spaces of the form . Since a
homotopy limit of -local
objects is -local, we see that is -local for arbitrary .
Now, to show that the -local model category is compatible with the
enrichment, it suffices to show that for a cofibration and
an -local trivial cofibration , the induced map
is an -local equivalence. Equivalently, we must show that for
every -local object the square
is a homotopy pull-back of spaces. But this diagram is isomorphic to
and since and are -local, the columns are weak
equivalences, whence the square is in fact a homotopy pull-back.
∎