ScalingStacks

12. Complete Segal space closed model category structure[0MTS]

In this section we prove (7.2).

The complete Segal space closed model category structure is defined using (9.1) to be the localization of the Reedy model category of simplicial spaces with respect to the map gg obtained as a coproduct of the maps φi\varphi_{i} of Section 4 and the map x:F⁡(0)→Ex\colon F(0)\rightarrow E which corresponds to the object x∈I⁡[1]x\in I[1]. Parts (1)-(4) of (7.2) follow immediately from (9.1). The only thing left to prove is the compatibility of this model category structure with the cartesian closure.

By (9.2) it suffices to show that if WW is a complete Segal space, then so is WF⁡(1)W^{F(1)}. In (7.1) we have already proved that WF⁡(1)W^{F(1)} is a Segal space; thus it suffices to show

[05W1]

Proposition 12.1. If WW is a complete Segal space, then the map g:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}g\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv} is a weak equivalence.

12.2. Homotopy monomorphisms[0MTT]

Say a map f:X→Yf\colon X\rightarrow Y of spaces is a homotopy monomorphism if

  1. (1)

    it is injective on π0\pi_{0}, and

  2. (2)

    it is a weak equivalence of each component of XX to the corresponding component of YY.

Equivalently, ff is a homotopy monomorphism if the square

X\displaystyle{{X}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}1\scriptstyle{1}1\scriptstyle{1}X\displaystyle{{X}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}X\displaystyle{{X}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}Y\displaystyle{{Y}}

is a homotopy pullback square. Since homotopy limits commute, the homotopy limit functor applied to a homotopy monomorphism between two diagrams yields a homotopy monomorphism.

12.3. Proof of (12.1)[0MTU]

The map s0:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1s_{0}\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} is obtained by taking limits of the rows in the diagram:

W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}1\scriptstyle{1}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s1\scriptstyle{s_{1}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}

By hypothesis, s0:W0→W1s_{0}\colon W_{0}\rightarrow W_{1} is a homotopy monomorphism. Thus the maps s0,s1:W1→W2s_{0},s_{1}\colon W_{1}\rightarrow W_{2} are homotopy monomorphisms, since they are weakly equivalent to W1×W0s0:W1×W0W0→W1×W0W1W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}s_{0}\colon W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{0}\rightarrow W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1} and s0×W0W1:W0×W0W1→W1×W0W1s_{0}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}\colon W_{0}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}\rightarrow W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}. It follows that s0:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1s_{0}\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} is a homotopy monomorphism.

Thus both s0:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1s_{0}\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} and (WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}→(WF⁡(1))1(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} are homotopy monomorphisms. So to prove the proposition it suffices to show that both these maps hit the same components. As we already know that (WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} factors through a map (WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv}, it suffices to show that this last map is surjective on π0\pi_{0}.

Using the part of the proof already completed and (12.4), one observes that a point x∈(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}x\in(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv} lies in a component hit by (WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv} if and only if the images f​x,g​x∈(WF⁡(0))1≈W1fx,gx\in(W^{F(0)})_{1}\approx W_{1} are homotopy equivalences in WW, where f,g:WF⁡(1)→WF⁡(0)f,g\colon W^{F(1)}\rightarrow W^{F(0)} are the maps induced by the two inclusions d0,d1:F⁡(0)→F⁡(1)d^{0},d^{1}\colon F(0)\rightarrow F(1). But if x∈(WF⁡(1))1x\in(W^{F(1)})_{1} is a homotopy equivalence of WF⁡(1)W^{F(1)} then certainly its images under ff and gg are homotopy equivalences. Thus the result is proved.

[05W2]

Lemma 12.4. Let WW be a Segal space. Then the squares

W0\displaystyle{{W_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s1\scriptstyle{s_{1}}d0\scriptstyle{d_{0}}W0\displaystyle{{W_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d2\scriptstyle{d_{2}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d0\scriptstyle{d_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}}

are homotopy pullback squares.

[05W3]

Proof. Recall that for a Segal space (d0,d2):W2→∼W1×W0W1(d_{0},d_{2})\colon W_{2}\xrightarrow{\sim}W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}, so that W2×W1W0→∼(W1×W0W1)×W1W0≈W1W_{2}\times_{W_{1}}W_{0}\xrightarrow{\sim}(W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1})\times_{W_{1}}W_{0}\approx W_{1} and W0×W1W2→∼W0×W1(W1×W0W1)≈W1W_{0}\times_{W_{1}}W_{2}\xrightarrow{\sim}W_{0}\times_{W_{1}}(W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1})\approx W_{1}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source · math/9811037v3