Proposition 13.2. If is a Segal space and is a complete Segal space, then a pair of maps are categorically homotopic if and only if they are homotopic in the usual sense; i.e., if there exists a map which restricts to and on the endpoints of .
13. Categorical equivalences[0MTV]
In this section we provide a generalization to Segal spaces of the category theoretic concepts of “natural isomorphism of functors” and “equivalence of categories”, and show that for the complete Segal spaces, these concepts correspond precisely to those of “homotopy between maps” and “(weak) homotopy equivalence”.
Note that, by the results of §9 through §12, statements (7.1) through (7.6) of §7 are now available to us.
13.1. Categorical homotopies[0MTW]
Let denote, as in §6, the discrete nerve of . We define a categorical homotopy between maps of Segal spaces to be any one of the following equivalent data: a map , a map , or a map , making the appropriate diagram commute:
If and are discrete nerves of categories and , then the categorical homotopies of maps between and correspond exactly to natural isomorphisms of functors between and .
Proof. The maps are Reedy trivial fibrations if is a complete Segal space. This is because of parts (2) and (3) of (6.4), together with the observation that
since is a complete Segal space by (7.3). Thus, categorically homotopic maps coincide in the Reedy homotopy category, and hence are simplicially homotopic since is Reedy fibrant. ∎
13.3. Categorical equivalences[0MTX]
We say that a map of Segal spaces is a categorical equivalence if there exist maps and categorical homotopies and . Note that if and are discrete nerves of categories, then the categorical equivalences correspond exactly to equivalences of categories.
Proposition 13.4. A map between complete Segal spaces is a categorical equivalence if and only if it is a simplicial homotopy equivalence, if and only if it is a Reedy weak equivalence.
Proof. The first “if and only if” is immediate from (13.2), while the second follows from the fact that complete Segal spaces are cofibrant and fibrant in the Reedy simplicial model category. ∎
Proposition 13.5. Let , , and be Segal spaces. If are categorically homotopic maps, then the induced maps are categorically homotopic. If is a categorical equivalence, then the induced map is a categorical equivalence.
Proof. If a categorical homotopy between and is given by , then is a categorical homotopy of and . The statement about categorical equivalences follows. ∎
Proposition 13.6. If is a categorical equivalence between Segal spaces, then it is a weak equivalence in the complete Segal space model category structure.
Proof. Recall from (7.2) that is a weak equivalence in the complete Segal space model category if and only if is a weak equivalence of spaces for each complete Segal space . This is equivalent to supposing that is a Reedy weak equivalence for each complete Segal space , since and since is a complete Segal space by (7.3). The result now follows by noting that is a categorical equivalence between complete Segal spaces by (13.5) and (7.3), and thus is a Reedy weak equivalence by (13.4). ∎
13.7. Categorical equivalences are Dwyer-Kan equivalences[0MTY]
In the remainder of this section, we prove the following result.
Proposition 13.8. If is a categorical equivalence of Segal spaces, then it is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence.
Proof. We first note that since , we see that categorically homotopic maps of Segal spaces induce naturally isomorphic functors between their homotopy categories, and thus a categorical equivalence induces an equivalence between homotopy categories.
Lemma 13.9. If is a Segal space, the map and both maps are Dwyer-Kan equivalences.
Proof. By (7.5) it suffices to show that the map induced by is a Dwyer-Kan equivalence. We have already noted in the first part of the proof of (13.8) that categorically equivalent Segal spaces have equivalent homotopy categories, whence is an equivalence of categories. Thus it suffices to show that the induced map is a weak equivalence for each .
We consider the diagram
where the horizontal arrows are induced by maps ; note that . We will show that the two horizontal maps marked are homotopy monomorphisms (12.2), and that the large rectangle is a homotopy pullback; this will imply that for each pair the maps of fibers
are such that is a weak equivalence and is a homotopy monomorphism, whence is a weak equivalence, as desired.
That the map is a homotopy monomorphism of spaces in each simplicial degree (and thus also the ’s) follows since , , and since is a Segal space, using (6.2).
The large rectangle is isomorphic to the square
(where denotes the limit of the diagram ) which is shown to be a homotopy pull-back by a straightforward computation using (12.4). ∎
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source · math/9811037v3