ScalingStacks

12.3. Proof of (12.1)[0MTU]

The map s0:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1s_{0}\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} is obtained by taking limits of the rows in the diagram:

W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}1\scriptstyle{1}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s1\scriptstyle{s_{1}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}

By hypothesis, s0:W0→W1s_{0}\colon W_{0}\rightarrow W_{1} is a homotopy monomorphism. Thus the maps s0,s1:W1→W2s_{0},s_{1}\colon W_{1}\rightarrow W_{2} are homotopy monomorphisms, since they are weakly equivalent to W1×W0s0:W1×W0W0→W1×W0W1W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}s_{0}\colon W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{0}\rightarrow W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1} and s0×W0W1:W0×W0W1→W1×W0W1s_{0}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}\colon W_{0}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}\rightarrow W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}. It follows that s0:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1s_{0}\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} is a homotopy monomorphism.

Thus both s0:(WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1s_{0}\colon(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} and (WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}→(WF⁡(1))1(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} are homotopy monomorphisms. So to prove the proposition it suffices to show that both these maps hit the same components. As we already know that (WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1))1(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{1} factors through a map (WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv}, it suffices to show that this last map is surjective on π0\pi_{0}.

Using the part of the proof already completed and (12.4), one observes that a point x∈(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}x\in(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv} lies in a component hit by (WF⁡(1))0→(WF⁡(1)){hoequiv}(W^{F(1)})_{0}\rightarrow(W^{F(1)})_{\hoequiv} if and only if the images f​x,g​x∈(WF⁡(0))1≈W1fx,gx\in(W^{F(0)})_{1}\approx W_{1} are homotopy equivalences in WW, where f,g:WF⁡(1)→WF⁡(0)f,g\colon W^{F(1)}\rightarrow W^{F(0)} are the maps induced by the two inclusions d0,d1:F⁡(0)→F⁡(1)d^{0},d^{1}\colon F(0)\rightarrow F(1). But if x∈(WF⁡(1))1x\in(W^{F(1)})_{1} is a homotopy equivalence of WF⁡(1)W^{F(1)} then certainly its images under ff and gg are homotopy equivalences. Thus the result is proved.

[05W2]

Lemma 12.4. Let WW be a Segal space. Then the squares

W0\displaystyle{{W_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s1\scriptstyle{s_{1}}d0\scriptstyle{d_{0}}W0\displaystyle{{W_{0}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}s0\scriptstyle{s_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d2\scriptstyle{d_{2}}W2\displaystyle{{W_{2}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}d0\scriptstyle{d_{0}}W1\displaystyle{{W_{1}}}

are homotopy pullback squares.

[05W3]

Proof. Recall that for a Segal space (d0,d2):W2→∼W1×W0W1(d_{0},d_{2})\colon W_{2}\xrightarrow{\sim}W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1}, so that W2×W1W0→∼(W1×W0W1)×W1W0≈W1W_{2}\times_{W_{1}}W_{0}\xrightarrow{\sim}(W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1})\times_{W_{1}}W_{0}\approx W_{1} and W0×W1W2→∼W0×W1(W1×W0W1)≈W1W_{0}\times_{W_{1}}W_{2}\xrightarrow{\sim}W_{0}\times_{W_{1}}(W_{1}\times_{W_{0}}W_{1})\approx W_{1}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source · math/9811037v3