Theorem 8.11. The map of (8.10) is a Reedy weak equivalence when , where denotes the category of simplicial sets and is a small indexing category.
8.9. Categories of diagrams[0MTL]
Let be a closed model category, and let denote a small indexing category; recall that the weak equivalences in the category of functors are the object-wise weak equivalences. Consider
| (8.10) |
where the isomorphism on the left-hand side is that described in (3.11), and the map on the right-hand side is that induced by the Reedy fibrant replacement of . If can be shown to be a weak equivalence, then this means we can compute the homotopy type of the classification diagram associated to -diagrams in knowing only the homotopy type of the classification diagram of itself. In particular, knowing determines the homotopy category of the category of -diagrams in for every small category .
A result of Dwyer and Kan shows that this holds at least for certain cases of .
Taken together with (3.11) we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 8.12. There is a natural weak equivalence of complete Segal spaces if and and are small categories.
We prove (8.11) below.
Remark 8.13. It seems that the theorem of Dwyer and Kan, and hence the statements of (8.11) and (8.12) should hold for any โreasonableโ model category , where the class of โreasonableโ closed model categories includes at least the โcofibrantly generatedโ simplicial closed model categories. We hope that future work will provide a generalization of these theorems to arbitrary closed model categories.
Let denote the category of simplices of . This is a category in which the objects are functors , and the morphisms consist of functors making . The actual theorem of Dwyer and Kan [DK84a], [DK84b] is the following:
Theorem 8.14 (Dwyer-Kan). Let be a small category. The natural map
is a weak equivalence, where denotes the fibrant replacement of a space , and is the homotopy inverse limit construction of [BK72].
Lemma 8.15. Let be a small category and let be a Reedy fibrant simplicial space. Then the natural map
is a weak equivalence.
Proof. Let be an object in (i.e., a simplicial object in ) defined by
There is an augmentation map , and the induced map is a Reedy weak equivalence in , where denotes the prolongation of the diagonal functor, in this case defined by . The result follows from isomorphisms
and the fact that is a weak equivalence since is Reedy fibrant. โ
Proof of (8.11). Using (8.15) we can reinterpret (8.14) as stating that there is a weak equivalence
Substituting for in the above for all leads to a Reedy weak equivalence
which is the special case of (8.10) with . To obtain the case of , note that by what we have just shown the maps in
must be Reedy weak equivalences. โ
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source ยท math/9811037v3