- (1)
Given and , and the result of a composition, then and .
- (2)
Given then .
11.2. Morphisms induced by compositions[0MTQ]
Let be a Segal space. Given , consider the zig-zag
this induces a morphism in the homotopy category of spaces. Likewise, given , consider the zig-zag
this induces a morphism in the homotopy category of spaces. Note that if and , then (using the notation of §5). We have the following.
Proof. To prove (1), let be a composition of and which results in a composite . To show that , it suffices to show that both sides of the equation are equal (in the homotopy category of spaces) to the zig-zag
The proof that is similar.
The proof of (2) is straightforward. ∎
Proposition 11.4. Let . Then if and only if the maps are homotopic for all , if and only if the maps are homotopic for all .
Proof. The only if direction is straightforward. To prove the if direction, suppose that and are homotopic for all . Then in particular they are homotopic for . The following commutative diagram demonstrates that .
Similarly , whence using (11.3), as desired. ∎
Corollary 11.5. If is a homotopy equivalence (in the sense of (5.5)) then and are weak equivalences of spaces.
It is convenient to write to denote the component of containing . More generally, we write for the component of corresponding to the component of in . The following lemma will be used in the proof of (11.1).
Lemma 11.6. Given a Segal space and and such that is a homotopy equivalence, the induced map
is a weak equivalence.
Proof. This follows from the diagram
Here the vertical column is a weak equivalence since is a homotopy equivalence (restricting to the fiber over of the projections to gives exactly the zig-zag which defines ). Since is a weak equivalence, the lemma follows. ∎
Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3
Original source · math/9811037v3