ScalingStacks

2.5. Compatibility with cartesian closure[0MSY]

Given a model category structure on s​𝒮s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}, we say that it is compatible with the cartesian closure if for any cofibrations i:A→Bi\colon A\rightarrow B and j:C→Dj\colon C\rightarrow D and any fibration k:X→Yk\colon X\rightarrow Y, either (and hence both) of the following two equivalent assertions hold:

  1. (1)

    The induced map A×D∐A×CB×C→B×DA\times D\amalg_{A\times C}B\times C\rightarrow B\times D is a cofibration, and additionally is a weak equivalence if either ii or jj is.

  2. (2)

    The induced map YB→YA×XAXBY^{B}\rightarrow Y^{A}\times_{X^{A}}X^{B} is a fibration, and additionally is a weak equivalence if either ii or kk is.

(A closed symmetric monoidal category together with a Quillen closed model category structure which satisfies the above properties is sometimes also called a “Quillen ring”.) Assuming (as will always be the case for us) that a weak equivalence or a fibration X→YX\rightarrow Y in our model category structure induces a weak equivalence or a fibration X0→Y0X_{0}\rightarrow Y_{0} on the degree 00 spaces, then it follows that such a model category structure makes s​𝒮s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} into a simplicial model category in the sense of [Qui67], since Maps​𝒮⁡(X,Y)≈(YX)0\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(X,Y)\approx(Y^{X})_{0} for any simplicial spaces XX and YY.

The Reedy model category structure on s​𝒮s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}} is compatible with the cartesian closure; to prove (1) in this case, it suffices to recall that cofibrations are exactly inclusions, and that weak equivalences are degree-wise.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

Original source · math/9811037v3