ScalingStacks

[05UA]

Proof. We prove the proposition by producing particular choices of compositions which give equal (not just homotopic) results.

To construct h∘(g∘f)h\circ(g\circ f) consider the diagram

map⁡(w,x,y,z)\displaystyle{{\map(w,x,y,z)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}d0​d0×d3\scriptstyle{d_{0}d_{0}\times d_{3}}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}map⁡(w,y,z)\displaystyle{{\map(w,y,z)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}φ2\scriptstyle{\varphi_{2}}d1\scriptstyle{d_{1}}map⁡(w,z)\displaystyle{{\map(w,z)}}map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(w,x,y)\displaystyle{{\map(y,z)\times\map(w,x,y)}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}1×φ2\scriptstyle{1\times\varphi_{2}}1×d1\scriptstyle{1\times d_{1}}map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(w,y)\displaystyle{{\map(y,z)\times\map(w,y)}}map⁡(y,z)×map⁡(x,y)×map⁡(w,x)\displaystyle{{\map(y,z)\times\map(x,y)\times\map(w,x)}}

Note that the composite of the vertical maps in the left-hand column is φ3\varphi_{3}. Any choice of k∈map⁡(w,x,y,z)k\in\map(w,x,y,z) such that φ3​(k)=(h,g,f)\varphi_{3}(k)=(h,g,f) determines compositions d3​k∈map⁡(w,x,y)d_{3}k\in\map(w,x,y) and d1​k∈map⁡(w,y,z)d_{1}k\in\map(w,y,z) with results g∘fg\circ f and h∘(g∘f)h\circ(g\circ f) respectively. By considering an analogous diagram we see that such a kk also determines compositions d0​k∈map⁡(x,y,z)d_{0}k\in\map(x,y,z) and d2​k∈map⁡(w,x,z)d_{2}k\in\map(w,x,z) with results h∘gh\circ g and (h∘g)∘f(h\circ g)\circ f respectively, and that for this choice of compositions there is an equality h∘(g∘f)=(h∘g)∘fh\circ(g\circ f)=(h\circ g)\circ f of results, as desired.

To show that f∘idw∼ff\circ\id_{w}\sim f for f∈map⁡(w,x)f\in\map(w,x), let k=s0​(f)∈map⁡(w,w,x)k=s_{0}(f)\in\map(w,w,x). Then φ2​(k)=(f,idw)\varphi_{2}(k)=(f,\id_{w}) and d1​(k)=fd_{1}(k)=f, showing that f∘idw=ff\circ\id_{w}=f. The proof that idz∘f∼f\id_{z}\circ f\sim f is similar. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

    Original source page 12

    Original source · math/9811037v3