[05VL]
Proof. Let denote the map defined by
|
|
|
Likewise, let denote the map
defined by
|
|
|
Then one can write as a colimit of the diagram
|
|
|
(10.4) |
of subobjects. (This is analogous to the decomposition of the
simplicial set into a union of
copies of , attached along faces.)
A straightforward computation shows that the maps
and
are covers, and
hence by (10.1) are weak equivalences.
Thus the result follows by comparing diagram (10.4)
with the diagram obtained by intersecting each object of
(10.4) with .
∎