ScalingStacks

[05VI]

Proof. In this proof, weak equivalence will mean weak equivalence in the Segal space model category structure. The composite map j​iji is a weak equivalence by construction, so it suffices to show that ii is also a weak equivalence. Given any αi1​F​(k1),αi2​F​(k2)⊂F⁡(n)\alpha^{i_{1}}F(k_{1}),\alpha^{i_{2}}F(k_{2})\subset F(n), we see that the intersection αi1​F​(k1)∩αi2​F​(k2)\alpha^{i_{1}}F(k_{1})\cap\alpha^{i_{2}}F(k_{2}) is either empty, or is equal to αi3​F​(k3)\alpha^{i_{3}}F(k_{3}) for some i3i_{3} and k3k_{3}. Thus GG can be written as a colimit over a partially ordered set of subcomplexes of the form αi​F​(k)\alpha^{i}F(k). Since G⁡(n)∩αi​F​(k)=αi​G​(k)G(n)\cap\alpha^{i}F(k)=\alpha^{i}G(k), we see that G⁡(n)G(n) is obtained as a colimit over the same indexing category of subobjects of the form αi​G​(k)\alpha^{i}G(k). Since by hypothesis the map Maps​𝒮⁡(αi​F​(k),W)→Maps​𝒮⁡(αi​G​(k),W)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\alpha^{i}F(k),W)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(\alpha^{i}G(k),W) is a weak equivalence for any Segal space WW, we conclude that Maps​𝒮⁡(G,W)→Maps​𝒮⁡(G⁡(n),W)\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(G,W)\rightarrow\Map_{s{\operatorname{\mathcal{S}}}}(G(n),W) is also a weak equivalence for any Segal space WW, and hence ii is a weak equivalence in the Segal space model category, as desired. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Charles Rezk

Original source: arXiv:math/9811037v3

    Original source page 23

    Original source · math/9811037v3